Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Crixcyon's avatar

It should be studied? No, it should be stopped.

Lisa Novakowski's avatar

I am now aware that posting or sharing this type of information is considered to be malinformation or misinformation. Yet, I now considered the source of this censorship. Clearly the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the World Economic Forum have a strong desire to keep information from people. They do not wish debate of their narrative. They also have no desire for people to go to alternate sources that are not approved by them to gain information.

From my knowledge, fibrous tissue mattter are not a usual finding post-mortem. Yet, strangely there seems to be more of it. The explanation should be brought to the surface. The medical examiner might want to learn if this contributed to severe illness or a physical condition that led to the death. How this information is being curtailed is unusually suspect to me.

These novel health therapeutics have had serious regulatory issues, that are now coming into the light. The adverse effects are becoming more known to the public. With this level of secrecy and protectio surrounding the jabs, something is grossly unusual. I find this important information is intentionally withheld from the public.

25 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?