Dr. Yeadon Comments on "The Positive Control" by The Virology Controls Studies Project
"In brief, it invalidates the basic method used in all of virology to “prove” the existence of a virus in a clinical sample."
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
By Dr. Mike Yeadon October 26, 2024
Well worth reading this. Sasha Latypova also recently interviewed Jamie Andrews about this work.
In brief, it invalidates the basic method used in all of virology to “prove” the existence of a virus in a clinical sample. That method is fraudulent because you get exactly the same results if you don’t add a clinical sample.
You see, at the time the purported virus-containing clinical sample is added to cells in culture, changes in the medium in which the cells are being cultured (grown / supported) are also made.
Those changes to the cell culture medium are all that’s needed to initiate the death of those cells.
When the experimentalist claims, upon seeing cell death, “Here is proof that the clinical sample contains a virus”, it’s total rot. Not adding that clinical sample yields exactly the same results.
These proper negative controls are not included in virology papers. If these are even mentioned, the reader is left to imagine that nothing happened. This is intentionally misleading.
These kinds of study provide no evidence whatsoever for the existence of viruses.
Best wishes,
Mike
Related articles:
"Virus" the biggest scam from the medical "profession".. But but.. we get sick and sometimes it's "catching".. Research "excitotoxic amino acids".. On his deathbed, Louis Pasteur said germ theory was "not the answer" and said.. "Terrain" . I wonder what he meant by that?.. "scientists and doctors" are Liars.. and the medical community has been proven to be sick murderers.. so yea.. Oh and cancer is caused by Parasites and is being cured with fenbendazole + ivermectin No wonder they demonized Ivermectin during the plandemic..
God Bless
The Bioweapon went after the mitochondria