Mike Donio, MS: Through the Eyes of a Virologist
'Visualization and isolation are critical to understanding whether there is sufficient evidence for the existence of viruses and if so, whether they’d even be capable of causing disease.'
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
Is there absolute indisputable scientific evidence for the existence of viruses and their ability to cause diseases?
Mike Donio, MS takes us on a journey through unexplainable paradoxes of Virology.
We are still continuing on the path (for now) of viruses. That said, in this video, I’m taking a step back and walking you through just what a virus is supposed to be and why virologists conduct the experiments that they do in an attempt to study viruses:
I’m giving a short primer on viruses and discussing two key areas, visualization and isolation. I think these are critical to understanding whether there is sufficient evidence for the existence of viruses and if so, whether they’d even be capable of causing disease:
Let’s now move on to discuss another topic in the realm of viruses. This time I want to delve into gain of function and the idea of synthetic virus-like particles (VLPs):
Are We in the Midst of the Greatest Psyop of All Time?
…I provided my thoughts on the psyop that is currently playing out around us. We are seeing all at once an affirmation of the “lab leak” theory in almost every major mainstream media outlet simultaneously as well as the Director of the FBI. This screams of coordination and where there’s smoke there is usually fire:
Related articles:
Dr. Michael Yeadon: Why I Don’t Believe There Ever Was a COVID Virus
Denis Rancourt PhD : Data Proves COVID-19 Is Actually An Illusion
ZERO Evidence of Transmission of Respiratory “Viruses” - ScienceDirect
Thank you so much for reposting this. I humbled and honored that you'd value my work enough to share it with your audience. Can't tell you how much I appreciate it. God bless you!
Note: If anyone has any questions or would like me to expand further on anything please let me know here or in the comments of the original post. Thank you!
Having watch a large portion of the first video, I am OK with your approach and what you are saying. My field is computer science, but I have nevertheless have had an interest in viruses for a very long time, and there is a certain overlap when base pairs are viewed as base 4 digits. This relationship has been used to create software that can give a sense of knowing a lot about genetics. How sound that knowledge is is a separate matter. It can be possible to find what you are looking for simply by looking, whether it is there or not.
My basic question about viruses, for longer than I can remember, has been "what are the design purposes of viruses?" What are they for? I haven't always been a believer, but I have always recognized design when I see it. I can't imagine that viruses are designed to make living things sick. That makes no sense. But I haven't come across any significant body of research aiming to understand what they are for, other than for studying them to understand how to make money off of them in one way or another, and especially from treating the symptoms of disease without necessarily ever addressing the causes.
I did come across one book, years ago (I don't have the title at hand) that did explore this question, although not in great depth. And so my question remains.