Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zelkova's avatar

This was known by anyone paying attention when the jabs came out. mRNA technology is different than historical vaccines, which is why the definition of vaccine had been changed. Gene therapy was even mentioned in the SEC documents. What's baffling is the people that saw, and experienced, the goal posts moving but still ran out to get their second dose and boosters. The gene therapy congregation, wishing death on us unjabbed, has destroyed any empathy I would have had for their future health issues due to the jabs. If they all die I won't care.

LOL I posted before watching the videos and those said exactly what I said. Here's the thing, I knew all of this before seeing those videos because I kept researching these jabs before making a decision about getting one. The more I learned, the more I was against them and why I have not gotten any, nor will I ever.

SomeDude's avatar

Pfizer Explains: The Challenges of Gene Therapies and the Exciting New Novel Genetic Therapies in Development

For all of Pharma’s perfidy, they have little if any inhibitions about transparently describing what they’re up to on their own websites. You can often find a degree of nuance about subjects or entities that is far more sophisticated than the nonsensical caricatured and/or blatantly false version contaminating the public discourse. It is also revealing to see what products are being developed, not only for insight into corporate Pharma’s machinations, but also to see what is coming down the pipe that can be ‘re’purposed by malignant actors to further destructive agendas. So I thought it would be instructive to report on some of what Pfizer has cooking on the public-facing portion of their website.

...

Pfizer links to a PDF showing all abovementioned 104 of their products in various stages of development.

(My addendum: Includes covid inoculation)

https://ashmedai.substack.com/p/pfizer-explains-the-challenges-of

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?