Dr. Mike Yeadon: Without Question, C19 Injections CAUSE the Majority of the Injuries Experienced and Occasionally Reported

ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports. It’s DEFINITELY causation.

One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/taking-on-the-mhra-part-1

By Dr. Michael Yeadon April 27, 2023

It’s very commonly said by bad actors and by people ignorant about causation analysis that “Correlation does not equal causation”, as if that means “You can disregard MHRA Yellow Card and FDA VAERS reports”.

That’s not at all what the saying means. It means precisely what it says, that you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY assume causation just because there are reports of harms after exposure to these injections. But you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY disregard the possibility of causation, either.

There’s a matching but more or less never used phrase: “Where there is causation, there will be correlation”. So what these enormous numbers of reports of injuries and deaths post c19 injections demand is done, by way of follow up, is to explore how strong is the evidence of causation.

There are widely accepted methods for conducting such an analysis, in the form of the Bradford Hill criteria. These are accepted by WHO as well as by the medicines regulators.

If just five of the ten Bradford Hill criteria are met, causality is accepted. Here’s the kicker. ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports. It’s DEFINITELY causation.

Without question, these injections CAUSE the majority of the injuries experienced and occasionally reported. It’s acknowledged in peer-reviewed journal articles that only a small minority, between 1-10%, of adverse events experienced after taking a prescribed medication are reported. This is for a variety of reasons.

Often the person doesn’t link the events so they never consider reporting it. Other times they do suspect causation but someone else, such as their family doctor, dismisses such a claim and they give up. Many people believe that side effects only occur soon after exposure to a toxic substance occurs.

While it’s true that some kinds of toxicity occur shortly after exposure (such as acute allergic reactions) others, by their nature, can take weeks, months, or even years to manifest themselves (such as heart damage, autoimmunity, cancer, etc).

Please take a look at the article, both to understand how dreadfully badly served we are currently by MHRA and especially to at least scan these causality criteria. They’re well thought through but they’re not high science. Anyone with reasonable linguistic abilities will be able to follow the examples given.

In closing, the author points out that MHRA knows perfectly well that the gene-based injections have caused tremendous harms, and if they claim not to know this, they will have had to not look at their own data. It’s that blatant.

Of course, they’re not telling the public, because they’ve been captured by those I call the perpetrators. They might be complying with strict orders or they might be enthusiastic supporters of what’s going on.

Please onboard enough information to be able to inform others of the risks and to push back on the lazy “Correlation is not causation” trope.

Best wishes and thanks!

Mike

Related articles:

Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on "Moderna contracts" By Sasha Latypova

Dr. Michael Yeadon: Every Single Thing We Were Told Is a LIE

Dr. Michael Yeadon: THIS MUST STOP! Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk

PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER: Alarming Data From Canada and Vaccines Batch Scandal

SHOCKING - Here is What Really is in the Vaccines

SECRET HISTORY: Military Spraying the Flu, RULE 23 and BIO WARFARE on Citizens

How the Medical Establishment Is Working With the Cabal To Facilitate Global Genocide