Dr. Mike Yeadon: Without Question, C19 Injections CAUSE the Majority of the Injuries Experienced and Occasionally Reported
ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports. It’s DEFINITELY causation.
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/taking-on-the-mhra-part-1
By Dr. Michael Yeadon April 27, 2023
It’s very commonly said by bad actors and by people ignorant about causation analysis that “Correlation does not equal causation”, as if that means “You can disregard MHRA Yellow Card and FDA VAERS reports”.
That’s not at all what the saying means. It means precisely what it says, that you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY assume causation just because there are reports of harms after exposure to these injections. But you shouldn’t AUTOMATICALLY disregard the possibility of causation, either.
There’s a matching but more or less never used phrase: “Where there is causation, there will be correlation”. So what these enormous numbers of reports of injuries and deaths post c19 injections demand is done, by way of follow up, is to explore how strong is the evidence of causation.
There are widely accepted methods for conducting such an analysis, in the form of the Bradford Hill criteria. These are accepted by WHO as well as by the medicines regulators.
If just five of the ten Bradford Hill criteria are met, causality is accepted. Here’s the kicker. ALL TEN (10) of the Bradford Hill causality criteria are met for the c19 injections in relation to the adverse effects reports. It’s DEFINITELY causation.
Without question, these injections CAUSE the majority of the injuries experienced and occasionally reported. It’s acknowledged in peer-reviewed journal articles that only a small minority, between 1-10%, of adverse events experienced after taking a prescribed medication are reported. This is for a variety of reasons.
Often the person doesn’t link the events so they never consider reporting it. Other times they do suspect causation but someone else, such as their family doctor, dismisses such a claim and they give up. Many people believe that side effects only occur soon after exposure to a toxic substance occurs.
While it’s true that some kinds of toxicity occur shortly after exposure (such as acute allergic reactions) others, by their nature, can take weeks, months, or even years to manifest themselves (such as heart damage, autoimmunity, cancer, etc).
Please take a look at the article, both to understand how dreadfully badly served we are currently by MHRA and especially to at least scan these causality criteria. They’re well thought through but they’re not high science. Anyone with reasonable linguistic abilities will be able to follow the examples given.
In closing, the author points out that MHRA knows perfectly well that the gene-based injections have caused tremendous harms, and if they claim not to know this, they will have had to not look at their own data. It’s that blatant.
Of course, they’re not telling the public, because they’ve been captured by those I call the perpetrators. They might be complying with strict orders or they might be enthusiastic supporters of what’s going on.
Please onboard enough information to be able to inform others of the risks and to push back on the lazy “Correlation is not causation” trope.
Best wishes and thanks!
Mike
Related articles:
Dr. Mike Yeadon Comments on "Moderna contracts" By Sasha Latypova
Dr. Michael Yeadon: Every Single Thing We Were Told Is a LIE
Dr. Michael Yeadon: THIS MUST STOP! Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk
PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER: Alarming Data From Canada and Vaccines Batch Scandal
SHOCKING - Here is What Really is in the Vaccines
SECRET HISTORY: Military Spraying the Flu, RULE 23 and BIO WARFARE on Citizens
How the Medical Establishment Is Working With the Cabal To Facilitate Global Genocide
Thanks Mike & Lioness.
“Correlation does not equal causation”
That expression is in the same class as "Safe & Effective".
It isn't just lazy. It is a deliberate misdirect into a dead end. Much like 'Conspiracy Theorist'. A thought-terminating expression installed in minds through messaging and repetition over many years.
2 truths that lead to a conclusion: Those BH criteria were met ages ago. And authorities are still pushing the bioweapon.
One needs only ask themselves 'what is the nature of a system that will continue to kill and maim when the evidence of harm is incontrovertible?'
I think we know the answer to that question, uncomfortable as it is.
Question is, what do we do about it? Since the criteria for taking action have also been met.
We are in a war. And we are suffering losses daily. And we are told 'don't fight back'. Another element of the psyops, since every piece of messaging is overriding the instinct to self-preservation. That alone can break minds.
Peace.
Thank you for getting this article out there… The correlation/causation argument and Bradford Hill criteria are very vital! I knew this information was out there but I never had it right in front of me.
🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽