Dr. Mike Yeadon: “ I Do Not Believe That Global Pandemics of Acute Respiratory Illnesses Are Immunologically Possible...”
Dr. Yeadon Comments on " The WHO deadline is less than three weeks away" by James Roguski
Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
By Dr. Mike Yeadon January 7, 2024
While I have little to no faith in politics, as I’ve learned how compromised it all is, I do believe that the only way we can signal how downright evil and frightening the developing powers of the WHO are (in relation to their international health regulations and pandemic treaty) is to write to your local elected official and the leadership of your nation.
Do I think if enough people write in, our national leaders will sign on to an exemption from these instruments?
I think that is unlikely.
BUT it’s not a zero chance. And do we have alternative plan to frustrate their efforts? Not really.
So please do one thing and write that you oppose your nation even allowing this treaty and regulations to come into force.
Personally, I believe that our politicians do not have the power to hand off our bodily autonomy to 3rd parties.
If it comes into force, I will regard it as an illegal act and pledge to ignore and oppose them.
A few notes:
1. I do not believe that global pandemics of acute respiratory illnesses are immunologically possible.
2. Even if they were possible, we have not experienced a very serious event, allegedly since 1918 (“Spanish Flu Pandemic”). It turns out even that is either faked or tremendously exaggerated, largely quite recently (the last 20-25 years). So why even the claimed need to transfer sovereignty to a central body?
3. Imagine despite the foregoing there was a “genuine, severe pandemic”. Let us compare outcomes in the current context and under the WHO treaty.
a. This is by definition a novel situation. Nobody knows the best course of action. This means WHO definitely doesn’t know. So why in the world would you want them to be deciding things?
b. When humans have faced novel challenges in the past, we have a brilliant system to determine the best response as well as to learn what’s definitely not a good idea. It’s that groups locally decide what’s best for them and this is communicated dynamically. We’ll benefit from rapid, empirical evidence linking interventions and outcomes. If there’s an obviously best response, everyone will them learn of this, together with all the suboptimal things to avoid.
c. “Those who would exchange liberty for safety will get neither liberty nor safety”. Even if a 3rd party could claim it knew best, I’d still prefer each nation to make its own decisions and face their electorates in the next elections.
4. Now let’s examine what could go wrong. I am if the view that this is solely about control and malign misuse of the power to control an entire planet. If I’m right, soon after these instruments come into force, an event will be said to have occurred which triggers the new powers. WHO, now effectively World King, can order whatever they want. Lockdowns, mandated testing, isolation and even medical treatment (including especially mRNA based injections).
There are no limits to what could be made to happen. Consider the possibility of endless, global scale, medical martial law. You think they won’t do that? Imagine the TV news. Riot police face angry crowds of protesters. There’s an appeal for calm from the prime minister. When that doesn’t happen, the army will be ordered in to patrol the streets, with instructions to apprehend & intern these dangerous people. It wouldn’t take more than a few days for that live exercise to play out. It could then remain like this indefinitely.
Vaccines would rapidly arrive and you’d be required to go & get jabbed or else all manner of restrictions would be imposed upon you who refuses. Proof of vaccination becomes a requirement to enter certain buildings, public transport or to conduct banking. It doesn’t matter if this lurid scenario was to happen or not. The point is, it COULD happen and it would remain like a sword of Damacles indefinitely.
We must not accept it and it’s important that our local politicians know we won’t, because it’s illegal and associated with criminal activity. There’s no possible justification for it and I don’t believe they even have the right to do it.