Private Member’s Bill C-293: Domestic Implementation Of International Pandemic Treaty
Private Member's Bill C-293, would domestically implement portions of the proposed "Global Pandemic Treaty", regardless of whether it was ever enacted.
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
By canucklaw.ca February 6, 2023
Remember the hype in 2022 about a proposed Global Pandemic Treaty? This was supposed to be an agreement that would give the World Health Organization binding legal authority over elected Governments. That seems to have stalled, at least to the casual observer.
Of course, the W.H.O. already has binding legal authority over Member States, which includes Canada. Anyone who’s ever read their Constitution would know that. That said, it doesn’t stop politicians from slipping in their rules in domestic legislation.
Private Member’s Bill C-293 was sponsored by Liberal M.P. Nathaniel Erskine-Smith (Beaches—East York). The content of which is interesting, to say the least.
Most Private Bills don’t become law. However, their content may become embedded into other legislation, and rammed through without proper debate and consideration.
Erskine-Smith isn’t a big player in Canadian politics. So, it’s strange that he would introduce something like this. Have to wonder if he wrote any of it.
There is something of a bait-and-switch here. While the Bill is presented as cooperation between various Governments in Canada, it’s clear that it also involves supra-national control.
Here’s where it hits home. This will not simply be a Canadian system. Instead, it will be done in collaboration with:
Foreign Governments
World Health Organization
United Nations Environment Programme
U.N. Animal Health and the Food and Agriculture Organization
Read the entire Bill to make sure that nothing is being taken out of context. But this looks like a way to slip even more draconian measures onto the public.
And again, there has been — to my knowledge — any debate or reporting on this Bill. Why exactly is that? Isn’t this in the public interest?
1908: International Public Health Office to be created
1926: International Sanitary Convention was ratified in Paris.
1946: WHO’s Constitution was signed, and it’s something we’ll get into in more detail.
1951: International Sanitary Regulations adopted by Member States.
1969: International Health Regulations (1st Edition) replaced ISR. These are legally binding on all Member States.
2005: International Health Regulations 3rd Edition of IHR were ratified.
Without regurgitating the whole thing, the W.H.O. Constitution has been covered before, including the fact that it’s legally binding on Member States.
As has been outlined here before, the 2005 Quarantine Act, Bill C-12, was really just domestic implementation of the 3rd Edition of the International Health Regulations.
We’ve also gone heavily into the creation of PHAC, which is essentially just a branch of the World Health Organization. It was created at WHO’s instigation. It takes over (to a large degree) what Health Canadahad been doing. The timeline is laid out, and worth a read.
Why does an unknown like Nathaniel Erskine-Smith introduce such a Bill? According to his Wikipedia page, he’s actually brought forward several pieces. This included (in the last Parliament) Bill C-235 to delete the drug possession offence from the Criminal Code. He also brought Bill C-236, to expand diversion alternatives for criminal cases involving drugs.
Whether or not this “Pandemic Treaty” ever goes ahead, this legislation seems designed to carry out the goals it was intended for. Perhaps this should be put to a public debate.
Again, why is this being done quietly in a Private Member’s Bill?
(1) https://eppc.org/publication/the-whos-pandemic-treaty/
(2) WHO Constitution, Full Document
(3) https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution
(4) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bills?chamber=1&page=3
(5) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-293
(6) https://www.ourcommons.ca/Members/en/nathaniel-erskine-smith(88687)
(7) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathaniel_Erskine-Smith
(8) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/43-1/c-235
(9) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/43-1/c-236
Related articles:
Public Health Agency Of Canada Created As Branch Of WHO; Bill C-12 PHAC Act
Health Canada Initially Created For Population Control Measures
Canadian Immunization Research Network, Which Evaluates Vaccines, Is Funded By Big Pharma
The Plan of the WHO Revealed by the Insider: 10 Years of Pandemics, From 2020 to 2030
The Corona End Game The Truth Behind The Symbols
The Corona End Game. Addendum The Olympics Rituals of 1992/2012 "Predicted" The Corona Operation
“For the Greater Good”: Shanghai COVID Atrocities Foreshadow Things To Come
How many Conservative MPs are not jabbed? Any? I would be surprized if any are not.
We will get no backing from these fascist pharmaheads. Every Con. Premiere is a total twit. They are all jab pushers to the max. They are bass turds.
You also need to understand what is going on at the WHO
James Roguski has been doing great work on this front. Please take a look at his latest Substack post.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/a-world-wide-call-to-take-immediate?publication_id=746475&post_id=102078066&isFreemail=true
We all have to get involved here folks. The distraction operations at home are meant to blind you to what is happening in other parts of the world.