Taking That Last Step To See Through The Lies….
Investigative report by canucklaw.ca
By Ronnie June 5, 2022
Definitions Matter: What The World Health Organization Calls a "Covid Death"
Plenty of decent people across the world are fully aware that their freedoms have been crushed in a planned and deliberate manner since 2020. They see that these “conspiracy theories” of using a so-called pandemic to implement societal control turned out to be accurate. Kudos to them for that.
But, there’s one step many won’t take: admit there’s no virus.
(Credit for the artwork goes to Bill Huston. Go visit his channel). This confrontation with Andrew Kaufman and Judy Mikovits is very much worth the watch. The full video is available online and mirrored.
Why does this last step matter? Because it’s the pipeline to realizing how deep the pharma rabbit hole goes. If there’s no “Covid-19”, then it means all of the testing equipment is completely faulty and invalid. Moreover, all of the other “viruses” discovered over the years would be immediately suspect. If no viruses have ever been proven to exist, then virology — and germ theory itself — come crashing down. In order to preserve the medical industry, then this lie needs to be protected at all costs.
Why are theories of lab leak and/or bioweapon promoted? Because they attempt to explain the origins of this “virus”, rather than look into whether it’s even real.
How is a “case” defined, according to the World Health Organization? (See archive).
Notwithstanding how vague “suspected” and “probable” cases are, the definitions for so-called confirmed cases are equally dubious.
A person with a positive Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT)
A person with a positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-RDT AND meeting either the probable case definition or suspect criteria A OR B
An asymptomatic person with a positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-RDT who is a contact of a probable or confirmed case.
NAAT testing doesn’t prove anything, which will be addressed later. Also, everyone, including the WHO, admits these tests aren’t reliable.
Not only is there the issue of no isolation, WHO recommends in its March 2020 (see page 3), and September 2020 (see page 8), guidance NOT to isolate for routine testing.
Perhaps WHO just doesn’t want proper testing done normally to save money?! Well, not really, their own paperwork (see archive) indicates that they view testing for just a gene to be sufficient.
If no virus has even been isolated or shown to exist, then what have doctors been prescribing over the years? Are they morons, or just being paid off?
Admittedly, it wasn’t really a topic addressed here for quite a while. However, the time has long come for hitting this home. And what is the definition of a “Covid death”? According to the World Health Organization, it is:
Unfortunately, this isn’t satire. The WHO actually provides this incredibly vague and meaningless definition. Only a complicit and deliberately obtuse media wouldn’t expose this. (See original), which has either been deleted or moved.
The BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC), admitted in April 2020 that these tests can’t actually determine active infection. (See original). Also, the 30% error rate is apparently just a commonly quoted statistic, not the result of real research.
There was an article in June 2020 (now deleted), where BCPHO Bonnie Henry warned against mass testing, as false positives could overburden hospitals. See archives here and here.
To repeat: considering that there is no virus isolation, and these tests aren’t designed for infection anyway, what exactly is being tested for?
Why is this virus pushed, despite lack of proof it exists?
Why have other viruses been pushed, despite lack of proof they exist?
Why does WHO recommend against isolation in regular testing?
Why does WHO see testing for a gene as sufficient?
Why is the definition of “Covid death” so convoluted?
Why does Bonnie Henry admit false positives could flood hospitals?
Why does the BCCDC admit these tests can’t determine infection?
These are just a few of the core problems.
There’s also all kinds of proof that this was planned in advance. And people should wonder about connections like the Rockefeller Foundation to the University of Toronto.
Of course, this isn’t to say that everyone who still believes in germ theory or viruses is a grifter or shill. Plenty of well meaning people are still caught up in that. They RIGHTLY recognize martial law being imposed, but can’t bring themselves to admit that it’s all been a lie.
Many accept that 90-95% of this is a lie, but can’t come to that last part.
That being said, there are still some basic questions that need answering.
Simply saying: “I oppose masks, vaccine passports and lockdowns” is a safe position to take. It doesn’t address the depth of the hoax.
And if you haven’t checked out the work from Fluoride Free Peel, go do that. This deadly “virus” hasn’t been isolated or proven to exist, anywhere in the world. Additionally, it doesn’t appear that any others have been either.
(1) https://www.bitchute.com/video/qm1z7PhGXnGe/
(2) https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Surveillance_Case_Definition-2020.2
(3) WHO-2019-nCoV-Surv_Case_Definition-2020.
(4) https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf
(5) https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf
(6) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHO-Guidelines-Classification-Of-Death.pdf
(7) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHO-COVID-19-laboratory-Testing-March-17-2020.pdf
(8) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/WHO-2019-nCoV-laboratory-September-11-2020-Guidelines.pdf
(9) https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf
(10) Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCoV by real-time RT-PCR
(11) https://www.bitchute.com/video/iKXqxr8RgNQz/
(12) https://odysee.com/@CanuckLaw:8/Definitions-Matter:d
(13) https://canucklaw.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/BC-COVID19_InterpretingTesting_Results_NAT_PCR.pdf
(14) http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Professionals-Site/Documents/COVID19_InterpretingTesting_Results_NAT_PCR.pdf
(15) https://www.glaciermedia.ca/bc-news/bonnie-henry-warns-businesses-against-covid-testing-4682197
(16) https://archive.ph/U2k6g
(17) Wayback Machine
(18) https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
(19) https://www.youtube.com/c/BillHustonPodcast
(20) https://www.chancellorscircle.utoronto.ca/members/the-rockefeller-foundation/
Related articles:
Public Health Agency Of Canada Created As Branch Of WHO; Bill C-12 PHAC Act
Health Canada Initially Created For Population Control Measures
Canadian Immunization Research Network, Which Evaluates Vaccines, Is Funded By Big Pharma
Your support is greatly appreciated!
If you wish to support by contributing a different amount from the substack yearly subscription, you can Donate via Ko-fi, where you can buy as many “coffees” as you like, monthly or one-time donations are accepted.
This whole subject confuses me. Most docs and scientists in the world take for granted there are viruses. Smallpox existed long before modern tech so those who blame EMF and modern poisons, I don't get it. Just saw my holistic doc yesterday, a follower of Christ, changed my life 8 months ago after 15 years of digestive misery - found and cured parasites in my gut (I went on a mission trip to Uganda 16 years ago, probably got them there) - anyway, he said he believes there are viruses or at least diseases we can't isolate, we didn't have the time to discuss why. He is uncertain why the alleged C19 has some unusual symptoms, ways it spreads, etc. 5G/EMF, poisons added to our air, water, energy our bodies emit... there are a lot of things we still don't understand about our own bodies, immune systems. If viruses don't exist, I haven't heard clear explanation for smallpox, common colds, measles, etc. I've listened to those 'there are no viruses' doctors, I cannot understand them.
The 'no-virus' theory: I would love to be convinced! I have NO axe to grind, and I have looked at both sides and am open to any interpretation that for me fits, as an MD, with what I would call a 'CLINICAL EXPLANATORY MINIMUM'. That means not just 'poo-pooing' a theory (germ theory) as false and fraudulent but actually proposing something that actually EXPLAINS WHY people got/get sick and die in the specific context of the Covid Hoax. I know, I know, 'TERRAIN theory' with its chemtrails, fluoridated water, glyphosate, food toxins etc.
Maybe the no-virus people are right, but hey, at least provide a theory of your own about what is going on, and the specific toxins that WERE killing people ACUTELY with respiratory symptoms in early 2020 in Wuhan, Milan and Iran, BEFORE the toxic jabs were promulgated.
The 'no-virus' people make some valid points. That said, ad hominem attacks (which many of the 'no-virus' people love to use), won't get us anywhere. We are all in the same army, fighting the same Hoax. We need to explore ALL models of pathophysiology.
Let's all go on logic, clinical signs and symptoms that need an explanatory minimum, putative pathophysiological mechanisms, pathology reports, and proposed aetiology (cause) and the clinical experience of many critical care doctors who have treated these patients (ie ICU docs, not just psychiatrists).
Marc Mullie MD, Montreal