Mar 12·edited Mar 12Liked by Lioness of Judah Ministry
Please all see my substack on the Scottish COVID inquiry which has revealled the truth of the fake pandemic. This is shown nowhere else. I implore people to share these !!
Thanks Joanie. Brand new clips will be added tommorrow. Scottish inquiry was prematurely suspended Dec 2023 till March 2024 because i was exposing it. It restarted today. Please spread the word !
We love and appreciate you dear brother! Please remember that the Bible says that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. Nothing else is needed. I want to be sure that you are on the other side rewarded for all you've done. God bless!
Dr Yeadon I’m sure that you have brought a good deal of valuable knowledge and experience to the table during this battle for medical freedom which I appreciate. I must however disagree with you on the claim that there was NO pandemic. Please get together with some of the high profile physicians who have treated thousands upon thousands of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, and work out this issue of claiming that there was no pandemic. A serious debate with valid references is needed. I suggest starting with the FLCCC Alliance or Dr. Peter McCullough. Perhaps you can go on one of the FLCCC weekly update webinars to discuss your findings. It is difficult as a physician to listen to you and others say that there was NO pandemic of a new pathogen which made many millions of people ill across our planet. A substantial proportion of those patients became seriously ill and some fatally. COVID-19 has unique clinical features which you will need to convincingly explain away. In addition, the infection is clearly communicable. Many practitioners sacrificed their esteemed careers to do the right thing. They successfully treated hundreds of thousands if not millions of patients around the world infected with SARS-CoV-2 using early intervention with repurposed medications. That is real!
But have you considered the 5G rollout at the time was the cause of the sicknesses. And the cover story for the damage that would ensue. As per every 'virus' event in history when the next new EMF was rolled out.
Sure, there were plenty of false positives with the PCR test which caused the number of cases to be overstated and could have led to the potentially false belief of asymptomatic carriers. I don't disagree with that or that some people with cases travelled to foreign lands, but what has that got to do with my statement on 5G?
5G is a beam forming tech. It can target individuals with sufficient power. Just because a state dosn’t have access to the tech does not mean the tech dosn’t have access to the state. The cruise ships, the initial hot spots for convid were the initial 5G rollout areas.
The world' first cruise ship with a 5G connectivity is China-built and will be delivered in 2023-Q4. The announcement was made by Adora Cruises (subsidiary and travel brand of the joint venture company CSSC Carnival Cruise Shipping Ltd) on Thursday, January 12th.
A pandemic is when everyone we know is getting severly sick or dying, left and right. That's how a pandemic must look like. But in early 2020 nobody I knew was dying or even getting sick at all. This is why it's so challenging to believe that there was a pandemic at all. Now this delusional mass injection with mRNA will create a real pandemic, like you have never seen in your life time. And when that happens, you will know what a real pandemic looks like. Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is predicting a " tsunami of severe ilnesses and deaths" in every single highly vaccinated country in the planet. The ones affected by it will be those that took at least two shots and never had covid before taking the shots. Who will be spared? The unvaccinated ones in good health.
My son, an only child, worked in private healthcare at the time. Married with young teenagers and a mortgage he had no choice but to have the jabs. The second jab, for which he travelled sixty miles, made him very ill. Subsequently, he keeps having reoccurring chest infections that do not respond to antibiotics. On the other hand, I am in my 70s and asthmatic. I never obeyed any of the Convid nonsense and in four years not once have I been ill. For those who still believe there was a deadly virus, The Final Pandemic, An Antidote to Medical Tyranny, written by Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. Samantha Bailey is well worth reading.
I'm so sorry for what happened to your family member. I can't help but reflect on how, with "benefit" of experience and so-called" hindsight", the idea of "no choice" regarding the injection must have undergone reconsideration. Again, so sorry for the misfortune.
"A pandemic is when everyone we know is getting severly sick or dying, left and right."
That's not the clinical or dictionary definition of a pandemic. I've looked at a dozen definitions in medical and standard dictionaries and none of them make any reference to severe sickness or death, they simply describe it as an outbreak of communicable disease affecting large numbers over wide areas, typically of international scope.
For the record, I don't think CV19 should have been designated as a pandemic, but I also don't believe there was no CV19, and so far the only person with professional standing I've seen make that claim is Dr. Yeadon. If there are others with similar qualifications supporting that claim I'd like to know because it would buttress Yeadon's position.
ebear: My understanding is that the WHO (or some other such authoritarian organization of criminals) changed the very definition of pandemic. Do you know when they did that or if you're using the new and improved definition designed to make so-called C-19 (patented - not sure how) fall into that category? Also, ARE you a robot/A.I?"
You caught the reference then? It's an old program but I see they've brought it back on MeTV so maybe you're not as old as I am? Anyway, thanks for the interaction. I didn't get much positive response otherwise unfortunately. Seems people here have made up their minds already and don't like having their beliefs challenged.
Only thing I would add is that if there was no pandemic (by whatever definition you care to use) and there was no CV virus, then it kind of lets the DOD and DARPA off the hook, because what that's saying is there was no gain-of-function research being done in Wuhan or at Fort Detrick or at Chapel Hill or at any number of labs in Ukraine and elsewhere, and nobody discovered unusual inserts in the genome because with no virus, how could they? So Pfizer, Moderna and a few health officials like Fauci get thrown under the bus, while the actual perpetrators get away scot-free.
There's a simple way to settle this question. If you have a older than 1999 dictionary at home just look it up. Otherwise go to the library and look at any dictionary that was printed before 1999, then compare it to one printed this year if you can find one - libraries don't update reference books that often. Too expensive.
I don't know but I don't understand why you're arguing this point. There was proof enough at the beginning of the scam that there was no pandemic - we witnessed with our own eyes the deception and the murders.
"I don't know but I don't understand why you're arguing this point."
I'm not. I'm responding to what YOU said about the definition of 'pandemic' being changed. That would require a super-human effort when you consider the number of dictionaries in all the libraries, schools and homes in the world. That's the definition I was using and for some reason people got upset about it. Why? Because WHO made some changes to the definition? If they did that, so what? The dictionary definition is what I go by, not some made up crap from the WHO, who at this point have zero credibility.
I also said:
"For the record, I don't think CV19 should have been designated as a pandemic..."
Look, if there's one thing I'd impart to this group before I leave it's this: Don't believe everything you read on the internet, and by that I mean EVERYTHING. Their side and ours. There's just as many people in the vaccine-skeptic camp spreading disinformation, just as the other side routinely does it. Some of it is plain lack of understanding, some of it is intentional to make us look bad, some of it is just jumping on the latest theory without doing the research to see if it's true or not. You can't be selective about skepticism. You have to apply it to everything, especially the things you *think* are true because if you're wrong, for sure it will be used against you somewhere down the road.
When you send people home and tell them to come back when they are half dead -- and then you don't give them antibiotics etc.... that alone will result in a very bad outcome...
But then you introduce a policy of giving them Midazolam and RemDeathisnear... and holy cow -- it begins to look like a disaster!!!
The flu makes people ill all across the planet every year, and kills many, but we don't obsess over it or count the cases...Furthermore, most people that were treated were also vaccinated and this is mostly not distinguished in any studies. Hence we can't tell the difference between the flu and bioweapon injury. SARS-Co-V2 so-called 'virus' is not in physical existence in any institution in the world according to Freedom of Information requests. How then are they testing for it? An IFR of 0.15% is not high enough to cause a pandemic. Therefore how do these people propose a pandemic happened? See Denis Rancourt for proof as to why there was no 'pandemic', except one of fear and reclassification, and murders by Midazolam, Remdesivir, ventilators. If there is no SARS-Co-V2, and the death rate is the same as the flu, and not high enough to cause a pandemic, and if the deaths can be explained perfectly by things other than a 'pandemic' of 'Covid', then I for one am becoming increasingly interested as to why smart doctors like McCullough keep invoking a virus and a pandemic?
Words have meaning, and commonly accepted definitions.
pandemic /păn-dĕm′ĭk/
adjective
- Widespread; general. Epidemic over a wide geographic area and affecting a large proportion of the population. "pandemic influenza."
- Affecting a whole people or a number of countries; everywhere epidemic.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition
The notion that there was no pandemic is highly questionable. One can (or could) argue about what was causing it, or whether the extent and effect of its spread met the definition, but to categorically state that there was no pandemic, or at least something that gave that appearance, is hard to reconcile with the facts.
People seem to have forgotten the extremely draconian response of the Chinese govt., the severe outbreak in Iran which killed several major political figures, and the initial outbreak in Milan, which was well documented.
Also of note was that a number of athletes attending the military games in Wuhan in Oct. 2019 came down with a mysterious respiratory illness which to this day has not been adequately explained.
Post-modern, ad-hoc definitions do not count. Pandemic was always defined by mortality, namely at least 3 or 4 percent. One death per mille is a very distant cry (me a wolf). Therefore, no pandemic.
Your last paragraph: Wrong. The Chinese health authorities diagnosed malaria. It is old news, and you should know about it.
"The Chinese health authorities diagnosed malaria. It is old news, and you should know about it."
Convince me. Show me where the Chinese govt. said that.
There's a generic problem with all these citizen investigations which is that people come to them with preformed notions of what they think they know. Genuine investigators start with an empty slate and follow the evidence where it leads, which also means questioning the source of the evidence presented. So, source please. For the second claim. Your first is just your own opinion. In the absence of a higher authority, I'm going with the dictionary.
2) Pandemic was always defined by mortality, namely at least 3 or 4 percent.
Show us where it says that. I've looked at a dozen medical dictionaries and none of them say that. All they say is widespread outbreak affecting large numbers over large geographic areas.
Here's the search term I used "medical definition pandemic"
Go ahead. Prove me wrong.
Here's one from Columbia University:
In being declared a pandemic, the virus has nothing to do with virology, population immunity, or disease severity. It means a virus covers a wide area, affecting several countries and populations.
We can argue about what constitutes a pandemic and whether it was justified to declare one in this instance, but what I can't believe is that Yeadon is saying there was no novel pathogen when any number of studies have identified it, as well as noted several anomalies such as unnatural repeating sequences and unusual inserts in the genome which are extremely unlikely to have occurred in nature, thus pointing to a high likelihood of a bio-lab origin. Surely Yeadon is aware of this? He also made a statement to the effect that all the 'vaccines' used LNPs and mRNA which is demonstrably false.
I'd like to hear it from the horse's mouth because I'm starting to wonder if this letter was actually written by him.
He didn't say there weren't pathogens released strategically in multiple locations to mimic "spread of a virus" as part of an obvious world wide criminal plot, for example. Now why would you think that angle of the plot would be neglected by the perpetrators?
I'm not looking at what he didn't say, I'm looking at what he said, which is that there's no novel pathogen, and that ALL the vaccines used LNPs and mRNA. Both demonstrably false statements, and if I had a chance to ask him why he said that I would.
There's a serious problem in the vaccine-skeptic camp (which I belong to) in that people make unsupported claims that can and will be used to discredit us. You only have to make one mistake like that and the MSM and so-called fact checkers are on you like stink on a pig. It makes the job of serious investigators that much harder, which is why I'm literally stunned that Yeadon, who I consider a serious investigator, would make statements like that, if indeed he did.
The assumptions in your apparent thought process are so numerous that your apparent conclusions are coming up seriously short in terms of scientific merit. Perhaps revisit and reflect on this aspect of your comment? Re-acquainting yourself with logical fallacies along with the basic tenants of the "scientific method" might be useful. Don't mean to presume anything about your knowledge base in these areas but your points as I perceive them don't illustrate particular strength. OTOH, do you suppose Dr. Yeadon didn't consider the potential points you attempt here and knock them down long ago? Seriously? Not attempting to make and appeal to ''authority" (one of the logical fallacies you employed in your comment), merely asking if you considered this and weighed it in to your investment in a conflicting point of view. Poorly phrased, but you catch my drift. Certainty can be a trap in not-well-thought-out opinions.
Umm, this is factually incorrect and patently false....there is not one single confirmed case of COVID...ever...in fact, viruses have NEVER EVER been proven to be pathogenic or even exist for that matter (outside of a computer program)...every single aspect of virology is hypothetical....and in fact, the contagion hypothesis has NEVER been proven.....in history.....you're a dupe, and you need to get yourself educated to the facts...
I recall going from the first confusing week wondering if my husband or I might not wake up one morning to fast forwarding a few weeks later as my friends and I enjoy a lunch at lakefront restaurant which was absolutely PACKED with nary a mask in sight except those worn down on the chins of the waitstaff. That’s all it took for me to feel kinda foolish for standing a time or two on those idiotic “footprints” on the grocery store floor while in line. Thankfully, I did my research and insisted that no one in my family partake of the bioweapon jab. We’ve all been entirely well with barely a sniffle over the past 4 years while having jabs friends who’ve had family members die suddenly and a few who have almost died themselves. Thank you from the bottom of my healthy and functioning ❤️ Dr. Yeadon for sounding the alarm on this murderous plot!!!! If the history books reflect this horrible time accurately, you will be one of our HEROES!
Thank you for taking a public stand Dr. Yeadon. When I first considered the seriousness of the crime, I felt proving it would necessarily entail a group of medical professionals testifying against another. People like me can say the same things as you, but it carries much more weight coming from you. I hope others will find courage and honor to join you.
Mar 12·edited Mar 12Liked by Lioness of Judah Ministry
Thank-you for your diligent work to place this information into the Public Forum REPEATEDLY.
Time is one element necessary for discernment of the prevalence of evil in people, society and the world. Sufficient time has passed allowing the evil to be known as a conspiracy to be OPENLY VIEWED with simple observation and a known threat to all human beings.
This PLANDEMIC has been NO ERROR, MISTAKE, MISJUDGMENT and
THE MOTIVATION HAS NOT BEEN TO PRIORITIZE PROFIT OR TO SIMPLY EXPERIMENT UPON THE UNIVERSAL HUMAN POPULATION.
This is all a deliberate plan requiring a century to manipulate, plan and implement. It's motivation is Absolute Power/Control through Mass Murder/Depopulation, Sterilization/Premature Death of Fetus's, Neurological Disability and Slavery of the remaining Population.
Please all see my substack on the Scottish COVID inquiry which has revealled the truth of the fake pandemic. This is shown nowhere else. I implore people to share these !!
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/
Great job documenting all this.
Thanks Joanie. Brand new clips will be added tommorrow. Scottish inquiry was prematurely suspended Dec 2023 till March 2024 because i was exposing it. It restarted today. Please spread the word !
The thing is ... the Vaxxers are not interested. Unless you work for bbccnn?
How right you are. I despair.
“Nothing that we do, is done in vain. I believe, with all my soul, that we shall see triumph.”
― Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities
It's different when the enemy is the DOD and every government on the planet
We love and appreciate you dear brother! Please remember that the Bible says that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. Nothing else is needed. I want to be sure that you are on the other side rewarded for all you've done. God bless!
Eagerly awaiting news of how Ben Bates of UK Metro Police responds.
Who is Ben Bates? He doesn 't appear on the Met website.
https://www.met.police.uk/police-forces/metropolitan-police/areas/about-us/about-the-met/senior-management-team/
Love to hear a response to this
Don't hold your breath
Mike Yeadon is a medical hero and a voice of truth in a world of big pharma and government lies.
👆🏻
Dr Yeadon I’m sure that you have brought a good deal of valuable knowledge and experience to the table during this battle for medical freedom which I appreciate. I must however disagree with you on the claim that there was NO pandemic. Please get together with some of the high profile physicians who have treated thousands upon thousands of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, and work out this issue of claiming that there was no pandemic. A serious debate with valid references is needed. I suggest starting with the FLCCC Alliance or Dr. Peter McCullough. Perhaps you can go on one of the FLCCC weekly update webinars to discuss your findings. It is difficult as a physician to listen to you and others say that there was NO pandemic of a new pathogen which made many millions of people ill across our planet. A substantial proportion of those patients became seriously ill and some fatally. COVID-19 has unique clinical features which you will need to convincingly explain away. In addition, the infection is clearly communicable. Many practitioners sacrificed their esteemed careers to do the right thing. They successfully treated hundreds of thousands if not millions of patients around the world infected with SARS-CoV-2 using early intervention with repurposed medications. That is real!
But have you considered the 5G rollout at the time was the cause of the sicknesses. And the cover story for the damage that would ensue. As per every 'virus' event in history when the next new EMF was rolled out.
The problem with statements like 5G caused the sickness is that you only have to find one exception to disprove that contention, and here it is:
https://developingtelecoms.com/telecom-business/telecom-regulation/9470-how-5g-ready-is-iran.html
from wikipedia:
On 19 February 2020, Iran reported its first confirmed cases of infections in Qom.
Iran had no 5G in 2020.
Then what is starling beaming down all over the world?
Auto correct, Starlink.
We’re the convid patients falsely PCR tested for an unproven virus? We’re the patients travelers to foreign lands?
Sure, there were plenty of false positives with the PCR test which caused the number of cases to be overstated and could have led to the potentially false belief of asymptomatic carriers. I don't disagree with that or that some people with cases travelled to foreign lands, but what has that got to do with my statement on 5G?
Starlink availability map:
https://www.starlink.com/map
You see any coverage in India? How about China, Russia, Iran or most of Africa?
All places with thousands of documented CV19 cases.
Also, are you aware of the inverse square law as it applies to radio signals?
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Forces/isq.html
Those Starlink satellites are 550km above the earth's surface. I'd be more concerned about radiation from the wiring in your house than those things.
https://emfadvice.com/emf-radiation-house-wiring/
5G is a beam forming tech. It can target individuals with sufficient power. Just because a state dosn’t have access to the tech does not mean the tech dosn’t have access to the state. The cruise ships, the initial hot spots for convid were the initial 5G rollout areas.
"The cruise ships, the initial hot spots for convid were the initial 5G rollout areas."
ORLY?
https://www.cruisemapper.com/news/11351-first-cruise-ship-covered-by-5g-network
The world' first cruise ship with a 5G connectivity is China-built and will be delivered in 2023-Q4. The announcement was made by Adora Cruises (subsidiary and travel brand of the joint venture company CSSC Carnival Cruise Shipping Ltd) on Thursday, January 12th.
Facts really don't matter to you do they?
"Graphene oxide can act as a solo trigger for most COVID symptoms. This is not a VIRUS or spike protein, but a chemical warfare agent"
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/you-are-not-sick-you-are-being-poisoned-db0
What Would Happen if Graphene Was Injected Into Humans? – A Short Documentary on Graphene Oxide
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/what-would-happen-if-graphene-was
Go Dr. Yeadon. Go Dr. Yeadon. Go Dr. Yeadon. Go Dr. Yeadon. Go Dr. Yeadon. Go Dr. Yeadon!!!!!!!!
A pandemic is when everyone we know is getting severly sick or dying, left and right. That's how a pandemic must look like. But in early 2020 nobody I knew was dying or even getting sick at all. This is why it's so challenging to believe that there was a pandemic at all. Now this delusional mass injection with mRNA will create a real pandemic, like you have never seen in your life time. And when that happens, you will know what a real pandemic looks like. Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche is predicting a " tsunami of severe ilnesses and deaths" in every single highly vaccinated country in the planet. The ones affected by it will be those that took at least two shots and never had covid before taking the shots. Who will be spared? The unvaccinated ones in good health.
I don't know a single person who was extremely sick - or died - from covid... none. Zero.
But then I don't know very many old people... cuz that's who died... just like with the flu.
But since the Rat Juice shots I know lots of people who got really sick with Covid - many young ones... guess what - they were all multi-vaxxed hahaha
My son, an only child, worked in private healthcare at the time. Married with young teenagers and a mortgage he had no choice but to have the jabs. The second jab, for which he travelled sixty miles, made him very ill. Subsequently, he keeps having reoccurring chest infections that do not respond to antibiotics. On the other hand, I am in my 70s and asthmatic. I never obeyed any of the Convid nonsense and in four years not once have I been ill. For those who still believe there was a deadly virus, The Final Pandemic, An Antidote to Medical Tyranny, written by Dr. Mark Bailey and Dr. Samantha Bailey is well worth reading.
I'm so sorry for what happened to your family member. I can't help but reflect on how, with "benefit" of experience and so-called" hindsight", the idea of "no choice" regarding the injection must have undergone reconsideration. Again, so sorry for the misfortune.
Thank you.
Very elegantly said Nnikk.
"A pandemic is when everyone we know is getting severly sick or dying, left and right."
That's not the clinical or dictionary definition of a pandemic. I've looked at a dozen definitions in medical and standard dictionaries and none of them make any reference to severe sickness or death, they simply describe it as an outbreak of communicable disease affecting large numbers over wide areas, typically of international scope.
For the record, I don't think CV19 should have been designated as a pandemic, but I also don't believe there was no CV19, and so far the only person with professional standing I've seen make that claim is Dr. Yeadon. If there are others with similar qualifications supporting that claim I'd like to know because it would buttress Yeadon's position.
ebear: My understanding is that the WHO (or some other such authoritarian organization of criminals) changed the very definition of pandemic. Do you know when they did that or if you're using the new and improved definition designed to make so-called C-19 (patented - not sure how) fall into that category? Also, ARE you a robot/A.I?"
"Also, ARE you a robot/A.I?"
Danger Will Robinson!
LOL - I believe it's "Danger, Danger, Warning, This Does Not Compute!" So you're also a senior!!! 😄
You caught the reference then? It's an old program but I see they've brought it back on MeTV so maybe you're not as old as I am? Anyway, thanks for the interaction. I didn't get much positive response otherwise unfortunately. Seems people here have made up their minds already and don't like having their beliefs challenged.
Only thing I would add is that if there was no pandemic (by whatever definition you care to use) and there was no CV virus, then it kind of lets the DOD and DARPA off the hook, because what that's saying is there was no gain-of-function research being done in Wuhan or at Fort Detrick or at Chapel Hill or at any number of labs in Ukraine and elsewhere, and nobody discovered unusual inserts in the genome because with no virus, how could they? So Pfizer, Moderna and a few health officials like Fauci get thrown under the bus, while the actual perpetrators get away scot-free.
At least that's how I see it.
Here's the Russian definition. Did they change that too?
https://bigenc.ru/c/pandemiia-c4005d
How about the Chinese? Are they in on it as well?
https://dict.concised.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=14493&la=0&powerMode=0
There's a simple way to settle this question. If you have a older than 1999 dictionary at home just look it up. Otherwise go to the library and look at any dictionary that was printed before 1999, then compare it to one printed this year if you can find one - libraries don't update reference books that often. Too expensive.
I don't know but I don't understand why you're arguing this point. There was proof enough at the beginning of the scam that there was no pandemic - we witnessed with our own eyes the deception and the murders.
"I don't know but I don't understand why you're arguing this point."
I'm not. I'm responding to what YOU said about the definition of 'pandemic' being changed. That would require a super-human effort when you consider the number of dictionaries in all the libraries, schools and homes in the world. That's the definition I was using and for some reason people got upset about it. Why? Because WHO made some changes to the definition? If they did that, so what? The dictionary definition is what I go by, not some made up crap from the WHO, who at this point have zero credibility.
I also said:
"For the record, I don't think CV19 should have been designated as a pandemic..."
Look, if there's one thing I'd impart to this group before I leave it's this: Don't believe everything you read on the internet, and by that I mean EVERYTHING. Their side and ours. There's just as many people in the vaccine-skeptic camp spreading disinformation, just as the other side routinely does it. Some of it is plain lack of understanding, some of it is intentional to make us look bad, some of it is just jumping on the latest theory without doing the research to see if it's true or not. You can't be selective about skepticism. You have to apply it to everything, especially the things you *think* are true because if you're wrong, for sure it will be used against you somewhere down the road.
When you send people home and tell them to come back when they are half dead -- and then you don't give them antibiotics etc.... that alone will result in a very bad outcome...
But then you introduce a policy of giving them Midazolam and RemDeathisnear... and holy cow -- it begins to look like a disaster!!!
Get it?
The flu makes people ill all across the planet every year, and kills many, but we don't obsess over it or count the cases...Furthermore, most people that were treated were also vaccinated and this is mostly not distinguished in any studies. Hence we can't tell the difference between the flu and bioweapon injury. SARS-Co-V2 so-called 'virus' is not in physical existence in any institution in the world according to Freedom of Information requests. How then are they testing for it? An IFR of 0.15% is not high enough to cause a pandemic. Therefore how do these people propose a pandemic happened? See Denis Rancourt for proof as to why there was no 'pandemic', except one of fear and reclassification, and murders by Midazolam, Remdesivir, ventilators. If there is no SARS-Co-V2, and the death rate is the same as the flu, and not high enough to cause a pandemic, and if the deaths can be explained perfectly by things other than a 'pandemic' of 'Covid', then I for one am becoming increasingly interested as to why smart doctors like McCullough keep invoking a virus and a pandemic?
"....then I for one am becoming increasingly interested as to why smart doctors like McCullough keep invoking a virus and a pandemic? "
Possibilities:
a. He knows more about it than you do.
b. He's been misled
c. He's lying to you
Words have meaning, and commonly accepted definitions.
pandemic /păn-dĕm′ĭk/
adjective
- Widespread; general. Epidemic over a wide geographic area and affecting a large proportion of the population. "pandemic influenza."
- Affecting a whole people or a number of countries; everywhere epidemic.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition
The notion that there was no pandemic is highly questionable. One can (or could) argue about what was causing it, or whether the extent and effect of its spread met the definition, but to categorically state that there was no pandemic, or at least something that gave that appearance, is hard to reconcile with the facts.
People seem to have forgotten the extremely draconian response of the Chinese govt., the severe outbreak in Iran which killed several major political figures, and the initial outbreak in Milan, which was well documented.
Also of note was that a number of athletes attending the military games in Wuhan in Oct. 2019 came down with a mysterious respiratory illness which to this day has not been adequately explained.
Post-modern, ad-hoc definitions do not count. Pandemic was always defined by mortality, namely at least 3 or 4 percent. One death per mille is a very distant cry (me a wolf). Therefore, no pandemic.
Your last paragraph: Wrong. The Chinese health authorities diagnosed malaria. It is old news, and you should know about it.
"Post-modern, ad-hoc definitions do not count."
By whose account? Yours?
"The Chinese health authorities diagnosed malaria. It is old news, and you should know about it."
Convince me. Show me where the Chinese govt. said that.
There's a generic problem with all these citizen investigations which is that people come to them with preformed notions of what they think they know. Genuine investigators start with an empty slate and follow the evidence where it leads, which also means questioning the source of the evidence presented. So, source please. For the second claim. Your first is just your own opinion. In the absence of a higher authority, I'm going with the dictionary.
I have no need to waste time convincing you - kindly do your own research. Where you see my opinion, I see your ignorance.
You made the claim. So support it with evidence. Otherwise you're wasting everyone's time, not just mine.
Useless.
You need a serious reality check.
1) Vis-a-vis Dr. Yeadon, you are less than a nobody.
2) Pandemic was always defined by mortality, namely at least 3 or 4 percent.
3) There is no proof of SARS-CoV-2 existence.
All your suggestions aim towards wasting more time, and nothing else.
2) Pandemic was always defined by mortality, namely at least 3 or 4 percent.
Show us where it says that. I've looked at a dozen medical dictionaries and none of them say that. All they say is widespread outbreak affecting large numbers over large geographic areas.
Here's the search term I used "medical definition pandemic"
Go ahead. Prove me wrong.
Here's one from Columbia University:
In being declared a pandemic, the virus has nothing to do with virology, population immunity, or disease severity. It means a virus covers a wide area, affecting several countries and populations.
Common cold pandemic. Pathetic. Try looking up "pregnant people" in your sources. Good luck, and good riddance!
Again, prove me wrong. You can't, so you shoot the messenger instead. Seems to be a theme around here.
Go back to the troll academy - basic training is not enough. Ioannidis, 2020:
"Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless."
We can argue about what constitutes a pandemic and whether it was justified to declare one in this instance, but what I can't believe is that Yeadon is saying there was no novel pathogen when any number of studies have identified it, as well as noted several anomalies such as unnatural repeating sequences and unusual inserts in the genome which are extremely unlikely to have occurred in nature, thus pointing to a high likelihood of a bio-lab origin. Surely Yeadon is aware of this? He also made a statement to the effect that all the 'vaccines' used LNPs and mRNA which is demonstrably false.
I'd like to hear it from the horse's mouth because I'm starting to wonder if this letter was actually written by him.
He didn't say there weren't pathogens released strategically in multiple locations to mimic "spread of a virus" as part of an obvious world wide criminal plot, for example. Now why would you think that angle of the plot would be neglected by the perpetrators?
I'm not looking at what he didn't say, I'm looking at what he said, which is that there's no novel pathogen, and that ALL the vaccines used LNPs and mRNA. Both demonstrably false statements, and if I had a chance to ask him why he said that I would.
https://news.mit.edu/2021/map-sars-cov-2-genome-0511
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418359/
There's a serious problem in the vaccine-skeptic camp (which I belong to) in that people make unsupported claims that can and will be used to discredit us. You only have to make one mistake like that and the MSM and so-called fact checkers are on you like stink on a pig. It makes the job of serious investigators that much harder, which is why I'm literally stunned that Yeadon, who I consider a serious investigator, would make statements like that, if indeed he did.
The assumptions in your apparent thought process are so numerous that your apparent conclusions are coming up seriously short in terms of scientific merit. Perhaps revisit and reflect on this aspect of your comment? Re-acquainting yourself with logical fallacies along with the basic tenants of the "scientific method" might be useful. Don't mean to presume anything about your knowledge base in these areas but your points as I perceive them don't illustrate particular strength. OTOH, do you suppose Dr. Yeadon didn't consider the potential points you attempt here and knock them down long ago? Seriously? Not attempting to make and appeal to ''authority" (one of the logical fallacies you employed in your comment), merely asking if you considered this and weighed it in to your investment in a conflicting point of view. Poorly phrased, but you catch my drift. Certainty can be a trap in not-well-thought-out opinions.
Umm, this is factually incorrect and patently false....there is not one single confirmed case of COVID...ever...in fact, viruses have NEVER EVER been proven to be pathogenic or even exist for that matter (outside of a computer program)...every single aspect of virology is hypothetical....and in fact, the contagion hypothesis has NEVER been proven.....in history.....you're a dupe, and you need to get yourself educated to the facts...
We are in the hands of rampant criminality at every turn.
May Dr. Yeadon's brave and relentless pursuit of the truth be forthcoming and ensuing justice for the injured and dead prevail.
I recall going from the first confusing week wondering if my husband or I might not wake up one morning to fast forwarding a few weeks later as my friends and I enjoy a lunch at lakefront restaurant which was absolutely PACKED with nary a mask in sight except those worn down on the chins of the waitstaff. That’s all it took for me to feel kinda foolish for standing a time or two on those idiotic “footprints” on the grocery store floor while in line. Thankfully, I did my research and insisted that no one in my family partake of the bioweapon jab. We’ve all been entirely well with barely a sniffle over the past 4 years while having jabs friends who’ve had family members die suddenly and a few who have almost died themselves. Thank you from the bottom of my healthy and functioning ❤️ Dr. Yeadon for sounding the alarm on this murderous plot!!!! If the history books reflect this horrible time accurately, you will be one of our HEROES!
Who is Ben Bates? He's not listed on the Met's website.
https://www.met.police.uk/police-forces/metropolitan-police/areas/about-us/about-the-met/senior-management-team/
If not us then whom? Thank You Dr Yeadon. !!!
No pandemic
No vaxxine
Long planned, orchestrated, pre meditated murder
Killing is killing.
Economic heartbreaks
Lives shattered
Relationships splintered
And what we say, think do mattered
Impose the Truth on circumstances.
Thank you for taking a public stand Dr. Yeadon. When I first considered the seriousness of the crime, I felt proving it would necessarily entail a group of medical professionals testifying against another. People like me can say the same things as you, but it carries much more weight coming from you. I hope others will find courage and honor to join you.
Thank-you for your diligent work to place this information into the Public Forum REPEATEDLY.
Time is one element necessary for discernment of the prevalence of evil in people, society and the world. Sufficient time has passed allowing the evil to be known as a conspiracy to be OPENLY VIEWED with simple observation and a known threat to all human beings.
This PLANDEMIC has been NO ERROR, MISTAKE, MISJUDGMENT and
THE MOTIVATION HAS NOT BEEN TO PRIORITIZE PROFIT OR TO SIMPLY EXPERIMENT UPON THE UNIVERSAL HUMAN POPULATION.
This is all a deliberate plan requiring a century to manipulate, plan and implement. It's motivation is Absolute Power/Control through Mass Murder/Depopulation, Sterilization/Premature Death of Fetus's, Neurological Disability and Slavery of the remaining Population.
Did John Campbell lose his You Tube channel over this?
Is John Campbells channel down?
Not at the moment.
https://www.youtube.com/@Campbellteaching
Awesome 👏🏻 thank you 🙏
Don't let them get away with it!!!!!!!!! Shout the truth from the mountaintops! Dr. Yeadon is RIGHT!!!!
Is this available directly from Mike Yeadon on substack? Not everyone can access Telegram.
See for yourself. As of Mar 13, 19:15 UTC the answer was no.
https://substack.com/@drmikeyeadon