World Health Organization Gets Closer to Expanding Its Surveillance Powers Through International Pandemic Treaty
Also: Australia agrees on digital ID rollout and data sharing
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
By Tom Parker
A post-pandemic power grab
The World Health Organization (WHO), an unelected global health organization that receives hundreds of millions of dollars in annual funding from a foundation tied to billionaire Bill Gates, is moving forward with plans to increase its surveillance capabilities under international law.
The WHO is attempting to push through these increased surveillance powers via an international pandemic treaty that will impose legally binding conditions on its 194 member states (which represent 98% of the worldâs countries) if finalized.
The global health agency has been working on this treaty since 2021 and a WHO intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) held a meeting this weekto discuss a recently released zero draft of the treaty.
The proposed expansions of WHO surveillance powers are detailed in Article 18 (âOne Healthâ) and Article 11 (âStrengthening and sustaining preparedness and health systemsâ resilience) of the treaty.
Article 18 instructs WHO member states to âstrengthen multisectoral, coordinated, interoperable and integrated One Health surveillance systems.â One Health is a system that the WHO has been striving to expand since the Covid pandemic. It uses links between âthe health of people, animals and ecosystemsâ to âcreate new surveillance and disease control methods.â
Article 11 directs member states to bolster their surveillance functions for âoutbreak investigation and control through interoperable early warning and alert systems.â
It also encourages member states to âestablish global, regional and national collaborative genomics networks that are dedicated to epidemiological genomic surveillance and the global sharing of emerging pathogens with pandemic potential.â
In addition to granting the WHO new surveillance powers, the treaty also strengthens its power and control over a wide range of international health work by requiring the unelected global health agency to be recognized as the âdirecting and coordinating authority on international health work, in pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, and in convening and generating scientific evidence, and, more generally, fostering multilateral cooperation in global health governance.â
We obtained a copy of the zero draft of this international pandemic treaty for you here.
The WHOâs INB will meet again from April 3 to April 6 to continue discussing the treaty. It plans to present the treaty to the World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of the WHO, in May and finalize the treaty by May 2024.
While pushback against the treaty is growing, many WHO member states are still committed to the treaty.
If finalized, the treaty will be adopted via an international lawmaking process under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution. Unlike national laws, where elected officials vote on laws that apply to their country, this lawmaking process involves mostly unelected diplomats voting on the treaty.
This WHO surveillance power grab follows the WHO pushing to greatly expand its surveillance powers through proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005). These amendments tell member states to build âcollaborative surveillance networksâ and contain plans for global vaccine passports. The WHO held a meeting about these proposed amendments last week and scheduled another April meeting to continue discussing the amendments.
Related:Â Â The media starts to admit Covid surveillance tools are playing into the hands of governments
And it doesnât end with surveillance. The unelected health agency also wants increased influence over the targeting of âmisinformationâ and âdisinformationâ through the pandemic treaty and the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).
The WHO is making this push as evidence continues to vindicate those who were censored under Big Techâs misinformation for sharing content about the Covid vaccine not preventing transmission (experts are now admitting it doesnât prevent infection) and the lab leak theory (government officials are increasingly admitting that Covid-19 likely emerged because of a Wuhan lab leak.
Source: reclaimthenet.org
Australia Agrees on Digital ID Rollout and Data Sharing
The federal and state and territory digital ministers in Australia have agreed on a deal that would allow sharing of digital ID and credentials in the new national digital ID scheme, according to a report by the Australian Financial Review (AFR).
The deal will allow the recognition of driverâs licenses and occupational credentials nationally and the data will be stored in a digital wallet that is in compliance with international standards.
New South Wales Digital Minister Victor Dominello credited the agreement to federal Finance Minister Katy Gallagher and called it âworld leading.â Continue reading
Coming to a Country Near You
Related articles:Â
G20 Declaration: Vaccine Passports Will Be Adopted To âFacilitateâ All International Travel
Private Memberâs Bill C-293: Domestic Implementation Of International Pandemic Treaty
EXCLUSIVE Special Report: Medical Profession Implements WHO Digital Diagnosis Code for the Unvaxxed
The Plan of the WHO Revealed by the Insider: 10 Years of Pandemics, From 2020 to 2030
The Corona End Game The Truth Behind The Symbols
The Corona End Game. Addendum The Olympics Rituals of 1992/2012 "Predicted" The Corona OperationÂ
What's sad is that America's patriots and organizations have said they'd unite with the Canadians to support them. Unfortunately, this seemed to have inspired the Canada bureaucraps to push full speed ahead, and closed all ways and means of doing so. Country after country is being isolated from any support by the people of other countries. In the near end, we will probably stand alone. At least for awhile longer if this dystopian control isn't crushed.
Im not interested in the fkn evil; WHO do these idiots think they are? Like, elected? Not that it would legitimize their evil plan..