8 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Can you honestly say that you've given a fair listen to the critics of Dr. Malone and the history and facts they allege? Which to over simplify in summation--that he is a "controlled-op" with decades of history within the pharmaco-military establishment, of which he brags, and has a history of shifting and self-contradictory, self-serving narrative spinning beginning at least with his June '21 appearance on the Darkhorse podcast. If not, consider that perhaps you've been a victim of your own failure to exercise critical thinking and use of discernment. All of that assuming you are an "honest broker" here and not purposefully spreading a bit of "mis-information" re Malone.

Expand full comment

At the start of the rollout he tweeted para "the data are clear ... the vaccines save lives".

Then he, supposedly, took a couple!?!

Given he did get injected, then he is stupid, controlled-op or not.

Expand full comment

He's a proven liar. IMO.

Expand full comment

I’ve not believed him from the start. Too ‘polished’. Too prolific. Too ‘virus’. I’m of the mind he’s a gatekeeper - keeping us looking at ‘viruses’ and ‘safer’ jabs - when it’s really poisoning by multiple means (and I believe mostly EMF’s). And being a lifelong contrarian and skeptic I’m not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt about anything until I see him openly question ‘viruses’.

Expand full comment

Bravo! Well said!

Expand full comment

I think I have given a fair read to several articles criticizing Dr. Malone. He has been accused of making millions from his patents. He denies that. So, it is a case of he said, she said. Also, I read up on the conflict between Dr. Malone and the Breggins, and I concluded the Breggins were wrong, I even made that comment, and the Breggins responded. I think those that swallowed the propaganda during the Third Reich, were part of mass formation psychosis, but I don't think that makes them victims, the Jews were. Same with those who bought the covid mandates and protocols. I have read a scathing article on Dr. Malone by Sasha Latypova, but I was unconvinced by her strong rhetoric. So, I am exercising a level of critical thinking, but it is my critical thinking, and it will have my inherent biases, as your thinking will have yours. To be more certain I would need to have a face-to-face, answers from Dr. Malone, even then it wouldn't be a 100%. I read almost daily Dr. Malone's substack and I find it meritorious, therefore, I mention him in the spirit of sharing. If my comments in general seem to a particular reader, to have a flavour of the spiteful motive to spread misinformation, then I would have to conclude they are misinterpreting my intent.

Expand full comment

So, your research has been completed. Ok.

Expand full comment

It won't align with your yardstick, but I am not obliged to align with your value system regardless.

Expand full comment