I’ve not believed him from the start. Too ‘polished’. Too prolific. Too ‘virus’. I’m of the mind he’s a gatekeeper - keeping us looking at ‘viruses’ and ‘safer’ jabs - when it’s really poisoning by multiple means (and I believe mostly EMF’s). And being a lifelong contrarian and skeptic I’m not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt about anything until I see him openly question ‘viruses’.
I’ve not believed him from the start. Too ‘polished’. Too prolific. Too ‘virus’. I’m of the mind he’s a gatekeeper - keeping us looking at ‘viruses’ and ‘safer’ jabs - when it’s really poisoning by multiple means (and I believe mostly EMF’s). And being a lifelong contrarian and skeptic I’m not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt about anything until I see him openly question ‘viruses’.
I’ve not believed him from the start. Too ‘polished’. Too prolific. Too ‘virus’. I’m of the mind he’s a gatekeeper - keeping us looking at ‘viruses’ and ‘safer’ jabs - when it’s really poisoning by multiple means (and I believe mostly EMF’s). And being a lifelong contrarian and skeptic I’m not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt about anything until I see him openly question ‘viruses’.
Bravo! Well said!