Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kim's avatar

I just finished an article that clearly spells out where we are and where we're going in the very near future, as in, imminently: https://www.globalresearch.ca/moving-toward-global-empire-humanity-sentenced-unipolar-prison-digital-gulag/5818824?utm_source=pocket_saves

Soon, without a digital ID, I won't be able to get on the internet, have a bank account, buy food, travel (there's nowhere to escape to, anyway). And it goes without saying, forcible injections are in our future.

So - this article comes across as such a waste - so petty. Such infighting. My take on Dr. Malone is that he is very precise with his words and resists speculating, which has enraged those who want him to agree to their perspective. The things I've read from the Breggins are the opposite - sort of a more human touch to communication. And plenty of innuendo, which by design, is not precise. Why would they even care about Dr. Malone? Or Desmet? Other than it seems like a squabble over psychological ideologies, like a turf war. And why would someone expect Malone to apologize for his work on a technology that has been turned into something that's harming people? Should Henry Ford apologize that his cars kill people? Actually, Ford has involvement with cars that actually kill whereas Malone has nothing to do with these vaccines.

Personally, I wish Malone would drop his lawsuits and I wish the Breggins would stop slinging mud (as well as a whole slew of others). I'm terrified of the digital ID and CBDC that's on our doorstep and this is keeping the people who would care about this so distracted. Maybe everyone involved are ALL controlled opposition because it's sucking up all the energy that should be going into opposition.

Let it go.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

Thank you for posting Diana's reply here.

It's appreciated.

Edwin

Expand full comment
38 more comments...

No posts