They are identifying something though, aren't they? There is correlation to disease to whatever they are identifying. Statistics prove that. Is this correlation identifying causation?
We can continually make strawmen over what some think is isolation and purification, in some Orwellian changing of definitions and double speak while using …
They are identifying something though, aren't they? There is correlation to disease to whatever they are identifying. Statistics prove that. Is this correlation identifying causation?
We can continually make strawmen over what some think is isolation and purification, in some Orwellian changing of definitions and double speak while using outdated paradigms that do not pertain to virus theory, such as Kochs protocols and arguing contamination because of the viral cellular replication process, but it is misrepresentation and misunderstanding of the subject.
What is shown as proof of the world never isolating a virus is shear misrepresentation in the most mendacious way relying on a definition and construct that that is irrelevant to the discipline at hand and is false.
Don't only look for data that backs your opinion, study the actual theory and understanding of controls and processes and repetition and verification that built this knowledge.
Nothing is perfect and it is easy to cast doubt, but is it being honest? Question everything, but realize that throwing the baby out with the bathwater is not a solution either.
I did not reply to start an argument or a debate. Getting into the minutia of one little detail opens up a pandoras box of years of science in separate disciplines that build the processes that comes together as a whole virology and diagnostic theory.
Believe what you want. My statement stands. Public data bases of genomic information along with statistics and repetition shows millions of data points that there is something there. Call it whatever you want, but millions of trained professionals like to use the term virus, retrovirus, Etc. It points to causation.
I think that is what you are doing. It was NEVER isolated. When labs asked for a sample the CDC didn't have nor could provide it. This was stated early 2020
English researchers built a clinic in the 1930's to study bacterial & viral contagions. They invited healthy and so n citizens to come & stay for weeks as subjects of their experiments. The clinic was closed in failure in the 70s after over 40.years. They never proved a sick person can spread their illness to healthy individuals. They never proved that viruses exist.
There have been many such studies over the years. None have proved the existence of a contagious virus.
You can continue believing lies brought to you by the "trained professionals" of Pharma/Medical genocidal cartel. When they announce another "deadly virus" outbreak make sure to get your "safe and effective" vaccine and all the boosters recommended by the "trained professionals"
They are identifying something though, aren't they? There is correlation to disease to whatever they are identifying. Statistics prove that. Is this correlation identifying causation?
We can continually make strawmen over what some think is isolation and purification, in some Orwellian changing of definitions and double speak while using outdated paradigms that do not pertain to virus theory, such as Kochs protocols and arguing contamination because of the viral cellular replication process, but it is misrepresentation and misunderstanding of the subject.
What is shown as proof of the world never isolating a virus is shear misrepresentation in the most mendacious way relying on a definition and construct that that is irrelevant to the discipline at hand and is false.
Don't only look for data that backs your opinion, study the actual theory and understanding of controls and processes and repetition and verification that built this knowledge.
Nothing is perfect and it is easy to cast doubt, but is it being honest? Question everything, but realize that throwing the baby out with the bathwater is not a solution either.
I did not reply to start an argument or a debate. Getting into the minutia of one little detail opens up a pandoras box of years of science in separate disciplines that build the processes that comes together as a whole virology and diagnostic theory.
Believe what you want. My statement stands. Public data bases of genomic information along with statistics and repetition shows millions of data points that there is something there. Call it whatever you want, but millions of trained professionals like to use the term virus, retrovirus, Etc. It points to causation.
I think that is what you are doing. It was NEVER isolated. When labs asked for a sample the CDC didn't have nor could provide it. This was stated early 2020
English researchers built a clinic in the 1930's to study bacterial & viral contagions. They invited healthy and so n citizens to come & stay for weeks as subjects of their experiments. The clinic was closed in failure in the 70s after over 40.years. They never proved a sick person can spread their illness to healthy individuals. They never proved that viruses exist.
There have been many such studies over the years. None have proved the existence of a contagious virus.
Do you have a link for that?
You can continue believing lies brought to you by the "trained professionals" of Pharma/Medical genocidal cartel. When they announce another "deadly virus" outbreak make sure to get your "safe and effective" vaccine and all the boosters recommended by the "trained professionals"
Have a nice day
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mike-donio-ms-through-the-eyes-of
I'm pure blood unless shedding got me. We sometimes just might be on the same side.
Not on the same side if you ignore the utter lack of evidence supporting any contagious virus exists