I'm not a lawyer but this case is a joke, and it's unfortunate that Mr. Watts family is being preyed upon by attorney Flores and his backers.
Plaintiff's attorney Ray Lee Flores II received his law degree from Abraham Lincoln University School of Law, an unaccredited (by ABA) online law school. Its graduates can only sit for the bar exam in California. There are 18 accredited law schools in California, half of which will accept anyone with a pulse. Mr. Flores chose a toilet paper degree.
Ambulance chasing must not keep him busy enough so now he is hearse chasing.
The lawsuit appears not to include little details like autopsy reports and medical records, instead relying solely on an affidavit from Sanjay Verma, MD who never treated or autopsied Mr. Watts.
Trade-named COMIRNATY FDA approved in September 2021 was identical to the EUA vaccine product - period. So Plaintiff's point-B46 and B47 and C65 are irrelevant.
And going after DOD? Why not? Makes sense if you're paid by outsiders to sue.
The problem is they have to seize the vials in order to test what's actually in it to prove that cornadi and the eua is the same and guess what you can't do that because it's DOD property
The problem is, your assumption is incorrect for multiple reasons. Product from each batch is "archived," so to speak, as are the CMC data for each batch.
That and ... the law. 21CFR 360bbb-3, and thereabouts.
That's why everybody is watching these grand juries in Florida and Texas to see if they have the balls to actually see the eua vials and see what the hell is in them. I guarantee you an absolute absolute s*** show will be set off if one of these states seizes those vials
Hello both, are you aware of the finding of DNA contamination in the vaccines injected worldwide? It turns out that what everyone got was derived from something Pfizer called “ Process 2”, and the product they submitted for the EUA was derived from what Pfizer called “ Process 1”. Process 2’s mRNA is derived from ecoli which (accidentally? ) left integratable DNA fragments , SV40 promoter sequence and E. coli endotoxin in the vials as contaminants. So no one anywhere actually got the EUA approved product. Any lawyer worth their salt ought to have picked this up by now and be arguing it.
Maybe...the problem is the PHE laws don't require them to deliver anything with strict standards at all. That's what most lawyers are not understanding. See the Katherine Watt article I posted earlier.
They signed procurement contracts under which the supplier has obligations to provide the product identified in the contract. If the product has been switched, the contract is breached.
When it gets thrown out you won't admit that it was a feeble, almost comical reach. You'll blame the usual evil cabal; "His lawsuit will go nowhere, not a word will be reported by the Presstitute media, the whole thing will be memory-holed and if he persists, the Ontario and Federal Governments both will ensure he will regret it"
I'm not making any assertions about the success of the lawsuit rather thst it was not aimed Pfizer who has a contractor defense in place which allowed for the Brooke Jackson Qui Tam case to be dismissed.
See Watts v DoD
Department of Defense of the USA; can a Canadian file a suit against a contractual arrangement to which Canada/ Canadians are not a party?
Go for it. Your suit will be as sensible and successful as this one.
I'm not a lawyer but this case is a joke, and it's unfortunate that Mr. Watts family is being preyed upon by attorney Flores and his backers.
Plaintiff's attorney Ray Lee Flores II received his law degree from Abraham Lincoln University School of Law, an unaccredited (by ABA) online law school. Its graduates can only sit for the bar exam in California. There are 18 accredited law schools in California, half of which will accept anyone with a pulse. Mr. Flores chose a toilet paper degree.
Ambulance chasing must not keep him busy enough so now he is hearse chasing.
The lawsuit appears not to include little details like autopsy reports and medical records, instead relying solely on an affidavit from Sanjay Verma, MD who never treated or autopsied Mr. Watts.
Trade-named COMIRNATY FDA approved in September 2021 was identical to the EUA vaccine product - period. So Plaintiff's point-B46 and B47 and C65 are irrelevant.
And going after DOD? Why not? Makes sense if you're paid by outsiders to sue.
Comirnaty is NOT LEGALLY IDENTICAL
That's what this lawsuit claims, citing no other US case law.
At least his New Jersey lawyer graduated from a solid third-tier-toilet law school. He practices real estate law -and he's Muslim (shudder).
This suit was filed four or five months ago. Has it been dismissed yet? I can't be bothered to log into my PACER account.
Hmm I think what is being claimed is thst the DOD asserted that the EUA version is the same as Comirnaty but it's not and it wasn't available.
The problem is they have to seize the vials in order to test what's actually in it to prove that cornadi and the eua is the same and guess what you can't do that because it's DOD property
The problem is, your assumption is incorrect for multiple reasons. Product from each batch is "archived," so to speak, as are the CMC data for each batch.
That and ... the law. 21CFR 360bbb-3, and thereabouts.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2021-title21/pdf/USCODE-2021-title21-chap9-subchapV-partE-sec360bbb-3.pdf
That's why everybody is watching these grand juries in Florida and Texas to see if they have the balls to actually see the eua vials and see what the hell is in them. I guarantee you an absolute absolute s*** show will be set off if one of these states seizes those vials
So product in the "EUA vials" kills people, but product from post-approval batches, was okay? Or less bad? Less lethal ...
They are legally distinct at a minimum
No, but the indemnity with the EUA wouldn't be available for the vials labeled as Comirnaty. The DoD actually got caught trying to switch the labels.
Hello both, are you aware of the finding of DNA contamination in the vaccines injected worldwide? It turns out that what everyone got was derived from something Pfizer called “ Process 2”, and the product they submitted for the EUA was derived from what Pfizer called “ Process 1”. Process 2’s mRNA is derived from ecoli which (accidentally? ) left integratable DNA fragments , SV40 promoter sequence and E. coli endotoxin in the vials as contaminants. So no one anywhere actually got the EUA approved product. Any lawyer worth their salt ought to have picked this up by now and be arguing it.
Maybe...the problem is the PHE laws don't require them to deliver anything with strict standards at all. That's what most lawyers are not understanding. See the Katherine Watt article I posted earlier.
They signed procurement contracts under which the supplier has obligations to provide the product identified in the contract. If the product has been switched, the contract is breached.
Maybe...
When it gets thrown out you won't admit that it was a feeble, almost comical reach. You'll blame the usual evil cabal; "His lawsuit will go nowhere, not a word will be reported by the Presstitute media, the whole thing will be memory-holed and if he persists, the Ontario and Federal Governments both will ensure he will regret it"
I'm not making any assertions about the success of the lawsuit rather thst it was not aimed Pfizer who has a contractor defense in place which allowed for the Brooke Jackson Qui Tam case to be dismissed.