That's why everybody is watching these grand juries in Florida and Texas to see if they have the balls to actually see the eua vials and see what the hell is in them. I guarantee you an absolute absolute s*** show will be set off if one of these states seizes those vials
That's why everybody is watching these grand juries in Florida and Texas to see if they have the balls to actually see the eua vials and see what the hell is in them. I guarantee you an absolute absolute s*** show will be set off if one of these states seizes those vials
Hello both, are you aware of the finding of DNA contamination in the vaccines injected worldwide? It turns out that what everyone got was derived from something Pfizer called “ Process 2”, and the product they submitted for the EUA was derived from what Pfizer called “ Process 1”. Process 2’s mRNA is derived from ecoli which (accidentally? ) left integratable DNA fragments , SV40 promoter sequence and E. coli endotoxin in the vials as contaminants. So no one anywhere actually got the EUA approved product. Any lawyer worth their salt ought to have picked this up by now and be arguing it.
Maybe...the problem is the PHE laws don't require them to deliver anything with strict standards at all. That's what most lawyers are not understanding. See the Katherine Watt article I posted earlier.
They signed procurement contracts under which the supplier has obligations to provide the product identified in the contract. If the product has been switched, the contract is breached.
That's why everybody is watching these grand juries in Florida and Texas to see if they have the balls to actually see the eua vials and see what the hell is in them. I guarantee you an absolute absolute s*** show will be set off if one of these states seizes those vials
So product in the "EUA vials" kills people, but product from post-approval batches, was okay? Or less bad? Less lethal ...
They are legally distinct at a minimum
No, but the indemnity with the EUA wouldn't be available for the vials labeled as Comirnaty. The DoD actually got caught trying to switch the labels.
Hello both, are you aware of the finding of DNA contamination in the vaccines injected worldwide? It turns out that what everyone got was derived from something Pfizer called “ Process 2”, and the product they submitted for the EUA was derived from what Pfizer called “ Process 1”. Process 2’s mRNA is derived from ecoli which (accidentally? ) left integratable DNA fragments , SV40 promoter sequence and E. coli endotoxin in the vials as contaminants. So no one anywhere actually got the EUA approved product. Any lawyer worth their salt ought to have picked this up by now and be arguing it.
Maybe...the problem is the PHE laws don't require them to deliver anything with strict standards at all. That's what most lawyers are not understanding. See the Katherine Watt article I posted earlier.
They signed procurement contracts under which the supplier has obligations to provide the product identified in the contract. If the product has been switched, the contract is breached.
Maybe...