When do we respond in kind? These traitors to humanity would be a foot taller after lengthening their necks if we do the math right on rope drops and body weight. We either get hate in our hearts or our children and us are going to be killed in my opinion bye Satanic pesophile Nambla alumni because they have everything to lose.
Non-violent action is the only way. The first thing is that more people need to understand that this is an unconventional war waged against We The People. Once enough people understand that, then things will change.
Are you sure that isn’t a typo? 100,000% increase? That just sounds inflated. I agree there’s a large increase. Absolutely. But 100,000 %? The hospitals would be paralyzed.
I'm in UK, retired, small circle of friends now, a few aquaintances. Through anecdotes, I know of 6 sudden cancer deaths, one colon cancer, youngish woman survivor, walking group, all getting skin cancers, plus latest 2 women, both told terminal, plus others with sudden cancers I hear about in my hairdresser salon. There are 3 others who just dropped dead and more with sudden onset dementia, plus others with constant infections of various types. I almost forgot the stroke and 3 blood clot survivors.
There's that motto- "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink." I led people to dangers of jabs, was ignored, told to stop, even unfriended on social media. Now, it's the relatives, or other friends of these who ignored me, so I'm not in direct contact with the victim. I can do no more. In the friend of a friend case, my friend told me "it was not her place to do or say anything, her friend is intelligent, knows how to research, etc. (not intelligent enough to research the jabs before sticking out her arm). She had health issues prior, so encouraged to get every update which has made everything worse, plus new, partial blindness.. She's been in and out of hospital with various serious conditions these last few years, probably jab related, and her opinion is the doctors "missed" the cancer due to her other problems. In her case, no identified primary.
I'm feeling slightly less worried, 3 years on from my 2 adult children getting the initial x 2 doses but it's been/is a worry, knowing of the calimari clots and sporty people falling down dead. There's those that say use this or that product to rid body of jab contents but same problems arise, the jabbed are not willing to admit to themselves that they were duped by their government and, if these injections were found to be dangerous, they'd put out an emergency news bulletin, right? But because none is forthcoming, the jabs must be ok.
Me with two adult boys. One pfizer 2 injections… the other with J & J…1 injection. Both have had personality changes and one has spent time in a mental hospital.
So I know “a lot” about the MRNA injections and a little about the viral vector injections.
With that being said, I expect to have to bury my kids. I told them not to get injected. They didn’t listen. The oldest as a Pfizer limp and just had a horrible breakthrough infection. I gave him and he took (out of desperation) Ivermectin which cured him in 4 days.
The permanent and irreversible damage to their immune systems makes their survival nearly impossible. I wish that this was not true but it is.
Grossly inflated. Decimal point in the wrong place?
I have seen a noticeable increase in cancer over the past three years among people with whom I have connections, but nothing approaching 100%, let alone 100,000%. I am inclined to think simply "That's unreal." rather than "That's unreal. But it's true". The latter would appear to be a self-contradiction, which does not add to its credibility.
I did a bit of searching before posting this comment, and I see that the "fact checkers" have been all over the story in a feeding frenzy. After digging through layers of utter nonsense from them, I found one who actually did a little research, and it is possible that the number was cooked up late last year by The Expose out of VAERS data, presumably by misinterpreting it. That's easy to do.
I'm not sure who or to what you are replying. I did refer to the fact checkers' "utter nonsense". Every now and then, though, there's a nugget of truth buried in there somewhere, and it looked to me like one of them actually researched and found something. Stranger things have happened.
Again, I'm not sure who or to what you are replying. I didn't state anything like that. But VAERS data is easily misinterpreted, because it is can be very difficult to interpret, depending on what you are looking for. That is no fault of those that took the trouble to report.
I was trying to YOU. I asked you a question wrote comments on this thread, you should know a little of where I am.
You haven't answered the question, you wrote the same thing.
FDA and the CDC, it's/was their responsibility to monitor VAERS m, interpret it. Though I'd be hard pressed to know who at the FDA is capable ! The CDC and the W H.O. (yes I know we aren't discussing the W.H.O) are crap entities AND you should read (you may call it research) about it. I did a research paper back in nursing school. They didn't like it, too bad.
When statements like yours are made, it's sets a tone. Yes, I know about causality. Nobody needs an -ologist degree to look at a set of data.
Standard protocol was IGNORED.
DR. Jessica Rose did an excellent job at interpreting the data way back. She has several -ologist degrees, and even a doctorate.
People have eyes, the power of observation, at last count I had lost 6 friends, women, they died in their damn sleep. In case you don't know, often heart attacks hit early morning hours.
I have a mother who got the shots despite my evidence that I put together to detour her.
She has been hospitalized 5x, five times. She came home with covidsmovid & pneumonia and Paxlovid in Dec. Her last visit to the hospital was in Feb, a direct result as far as I'm concerned DUE TO Paxlovid.
I have amassed the pieces to the puzzle, I was AWARE of something 36 yrs ago when I noticed the dumbing down of society. There is only one reason why you want people dumbed down.
Manipulation, easier to brainwash. So that they fall into the mindset that a reporting system is not for public consumption.
OK, but I don't think I am saying what you see that I am saying. I am not saying anyone lied when making their VAERS reports. That's our government officials attempting to discredit those who were able to file reports. Their judgement is coming.
I am, however, a professional database developer and I am familiar with the challenges involved in interpreting data extracted from government databases like VAERS, even when the data isn't being intentionally manipulated. In the past I have done this kind of work myself in connection with other federal and state health-related databases. I am saying that the people behind whichever website originally made the "143,233% increase in cancers" claim may have misinterpreted the data.
Jessica Rose, on the other hand, has done an excellent job of extracting and sifting the data to the extent possible, in spite of the difficulties, and she has described those difficulties in detail. Ask her what she thinks of the "143,233% increase" claim.
I'll leave it to you as to whether it makes sense.
I am certainly not saying that there has not been an increase in cancers. I can see that there has been, directly, from the prayer lists of my present and former churches. Also I have lost friends and associates to that increase, and I have attended two of their memorials. Others that I know are battling cancer now, and quite possibly losing, and from what I can tell the situation is worsening year by year.
I have never seen anything like this before. In my church's prayer list this week we had two "died suddenlies" (a record, I think) and so many cases of brain cancer that I started to lose count, and that was only a fraction of the total cancer-related prayer requests. Still, it's not a 143 thousand percent increase.
My brain spit out an error & froze. Let's entertain a few guesses by removing one zero at a time & rounding her percentage off to 140, 14 and 1.4. There are over 600,00 cancer deaths in US. 140x = 84 million, 14x = 8.4 million, 1.4 = 840k. 84 million is heading towards Deagle's 2025 US depopulation forecast. 8.4M is a lot, but 240k more than usual seems low, all things considered.
Of course this is all moot, because extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof and she provided none.
No, I think you misunderstand. My point was this interview originated with CHD (Childrens Health Defence) whose website is free to all and so I felt it would be more straightforward to provide readers with their direct link, rather than go through a third party (including ads) like Rumble.
Nobody is ever going to be held accountable, I've been saying this since '21.
I'm not sure whayt it is that people aren't getting.
That's your inner voice that's been screaming, time to listen to it. For those that don't or can't, all are lost causes and may as well go to Davos and get your lithium mining jumpsuit.
I watched this hoping she would go into the numbers, but it was just a "by the way" at the very end. I am wondering what this report is that she is referencing and where this large percentage increase is documented. One thing I have learned over the last 4 years is you have to check it out yourself.
Well, you can look at some things Edward Dowd has put out. He takes a lot of data from the actuaries. If anyone KNOWS numbers, it would be actuaries. You can look at death numbers yourself, start on a non covidsmovid year. They group by age, type of cancer, and do some right math.
I don't understand, do you people still believe in shots? Do you not believe that they have killed millions through primary and secondary ways?
"You people"? Thanks. No, I don't believe in the shots, not even close. My comment was directed to the fact that the whole headline of the story was "US government data confirms...." but then the interview went on and on, and the government data was not presented and only barely mentioned as an afterthought at the end. In other words, the headline was misleading, and the "government data" and its source was not presented at all, even though it was the title of the show.
Lets assume that there are 200,000 new cancer patients each year. A 143,000% increase would mean approximately 280 million new patients. Even spread out over the last 44 months of mRNA injections, that is over 6 million new patients every month. The math does not work very well.
A 143,000% increase is an increase of 1,430 for each previous instance. Assuming that there are usually 500,000 new cases every year, a 143,000% increase means 700 million news cases which is double the country's population. Maybe we all have cancer X's two. This number of 143,000% makes no sense that I can see.
There is no where near or there wasn't 500K cases of cancer every year. You can look these numbers up yourself. Take a year that covidsmovid wasn't around, 2019 for example. They group cancer by age and type, probably other ways, but these 2 categories I know. Do some right math.
In 2021, the American Cancer Society's Facts & Figures annual report estimated that the number of new US cancer cases and deaths in 2022 would be an estimated 1.9 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 609,360 deaths.
Taking this as a very rough baseline for purposes of deriving an order-of-magnitude, if you multiply the new diagnoses figure by 144,000%, you get:
1,900,000 × 1,444 = 2.74 billion new cancer diagnoses
The population of the US is about 333 million. so that's about 8.3 new cancer diagnoses per American. I'm either doing the math wrong or I'm missing something.
That 1400/1 increase in cancer diagnosis is difficult to conceive of. There wouldn't be enough doctors to diagnose that many people. Cancer rates were well above 1/1400 before the injections. How many cancer diagnoses do we all have? If we all have cancer 100x this number is conceivable.
Hi LoJ. I used to be on a couple of dozen newsletters/substacks, but now you, a couple other substacks, and Epoch Times' newsletter are all I watch regularly. (And I rely on your headlines far more than I do ET's.)
Thank you for your Iron Maiden diligence and consistency. You often break news before I see it anywhere else.
I'd like you to know what Facebook has been doing lately. Maybe 2 out of 4 or 5 times it accepts my posts that feature your articles, but as of last week it started deleting them almost immediately. Anything that Fuckbook doesn't like the "politics" of, it dubs as "spam". Three times last week. And of course the "See all (3)" button does nothing but go 'round in circles.
Sorry, tried to paste the image here but I guess that's not allowed in comments. It reads:
Yeah, the pissant schmuck doesn't care, as long as we keep showing up for him to flash ads at. He gets $$ regardless. It's one of the ways to tell who is bullshitting and who isn't. Don't pay attention to what they say -- see if *they* do. Disregard of their own content, no matter how self-contradictory, hypocritical, flip-flop, bizarre, or asinine -- as long as it comes close to the bull$(hit)eye -- all good to them.
Introduce pesticides to further kill bugs and biome !Gut health[ severed
Radioactive Salt pumped into Cell to cause cancer. Salt added caking agent to prevent Vit C uptake!
Introduce Glyphosate and Gmo ☠️ POISIN SALT to break down cyp 450 in the gut noPREVENT UPTAKE of Vit D n B12 Destroys ability to make hormones (fat n lazy) and all immune response to clean cell! B-12 happiness and Connection to God via Csf fluid!
FAKE OR BAD OIL
CAMPAIGN[Mass PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE]
FOR
LOW SALT DIET
CHOLESTEROL
Target mothers to get children
Chlorine / Sunscreen
Against sugar
🥩 Beef
Good seeds walnuts peacans
Margarine = [ Nickle ]
SEED oils
Vaccines Futher destruction introduce toxins to tbe cell enter sacrilegious Medium dna and metals direct blood stream bypassing gut response and cleanse mechanisms Then Mnra Vaxx or death shot to alter Gods Code
Bio weapon tbe Common cold or flu
Solution: med is sin to make infertility.
Statins
Die abeaties
1970s Unfinished agenda sponsored by the Rockefeller foundation Chapter: Population How Many is too many Chapter on Food Vaccines Health Care
Kissinger Controll the food controll the people control media control the minds control the banks control the world !
”How can a government they trust do this to them?”
It's been 5 years now.
It's been proven to be intentional (see Sasha Latypova's substack)
When are we going to start calling this a war? On *us*
When do we respond in kind? These traitors to humanity would be a foot taller after lengthening their necks if we do the math right on rope drops and body weight. We either get hate in our hearts or our children and us are going to be killed in my opinion bye Satanic pesophile Nambla alumni because they have everything to lose.
Non-violent action is the only way. The first thing is that more people need to understand that this is an unconventional war waged against We The People. Once enough people understand that, then things will change.
Are you sure that isn’t a typo? 100,000% increase? That just sounds inflated. I agree there’s a large increase. Absolutely. But 100,000 %? The hospitals would be paralyzed.
KAMALA JUST SAID 230,000,000 DIED. MILLION……..
That's her prediction when she receives the dictatorship crown.
Biden's brain in an over-ripening body?
That would be a 1001x increase - according to this article it is 1433x.
A lot of them don't last long, so whereas previously the hospitals might take 10 years or more to finish them off, now it could be days/weeks/months.
Turbo cancers can Kill in weeks ...
Indeed, Dr. Makis has even referenced a couple of cases of blood cancer in which the young victims died hours after diagnosis.
yes the do
I'm in UK, retired, small circle of friends now, a few aquaintances. Through anecdotes, I know of 6 sudden cancer deaths, one colon cancer, youngish woman survivor, walking group, all getting skin cancers, plus latest 2 women, both told terminal, plus others with sudden cancers I hear about in my hairdresser salon. There are 3 others who just dropped dead and more with sudden onset dementia, plus others with constant infections of various types. I almost forgot the stroke and 3 blood clot survivors.
I hope they all know about the Tippens Protocol, Fenbendazole and Ivermectin?
That's not going to do a damn thing for people with these sudden stage 3 and 4 cancers..
Think again!
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/breaking-news-stage-4-cancer-patients?utm_source=publication-search
I don't need to think again, but thanks.
I AM A DEEP THINKER, ALSO PRACTICAL.
There's that motto- "You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink." I led people to dangers of jabs, was ignored, told to stop, even unfriended on social media. Now, it's the relatives, or other friends of these who ignored me, so I'm not in direct contact with the victim. I can do no more. In the friend of a friend case, my friend told me "it was not her place to do or say anything, her friend is intelligent, knows how to research, etc. (not intelligent enough to research the jabs before sticking out her arm). She had health issues prior, so encouraged to get every update which has made everything worse, plus new, partial blindness.. She's been in and out of hospital with various serious conditions these last few years, probably jab related, and her opinion is the doctors "missed" the cancer due to her other problems. In her case, no identified primary.
What a situation, isn't it?! Frustrating and scary!
I'm feeling slightly less worried, 3 years on from my 2 adult children getting the initial x 2 doses but it's been/is a worry, knowing of the calimari clots and sporty people falling down dead. There's those that say use this or that product to rid body of jab contents but same problems arise, the jabbed are not willing to admit to themselves that they were duped by their government and, if these injections were found to be dangerous, they'd put out an emergency news bulletin, right? But because none is forthcoming, the jabs must be ok.
Yes, you're right. Denial is a big part of the problem. It's frustrating and the scary part is how deep it goes :(
Me with two adult boys. One pfizer 2 injections… the other with J & J…1 injection. Both have had personality changes and one has spent time in a mental hospital.
So I know “a lot” about the MRNA injections and a little about the viral vector injections.
With that being said, I expect to have to bury my kids. I told them not to get injected. They didn’t listen. The oldest as a Pfizer limp and just had a horrible breakthrough infection. I gave him and he took (out of desperation) Ivermectin which cured him in 4 days.
The permanent and irreversible damage to their immune systems makes their survival nearly impossible. I wish that this was not true but it is.
They are all going to die.
Grossly inflated. Decimal point in the wrong place?
I have seen a noticeable increase in cancer over the past three years among people with whom I have connections, but nothing approaching 100%, let alone 100,000%. I am inclined to think simply "That's unreal." rather than "That's unreal. But it's true". The latter would appear to be a self-contradiction, which does not add to its credibility.
I did a bit of searching before posting this comment, and I see that the "fact checkers" have been all over the story in a feeding frenzy. After digging through layers of utter nonsense from them, I found one who actually did a little research, and it is possible that the number was cooked up late last year by The Expose out of VAERS data, presumably by misinterpreting it. That's easy to do.
Why do you believe e the FACT CHECKERS? I suggest you track back and see who owns the business.
I'm not sure who or to what you are replying. I did refer to the fact checkers' "utter nonsense". Every now and then, though, there's a nugget of truth buried in there somewhere, and it looked to me like one of them actually researched and found something. Stranger things have happened.
Are you implying that people lied to VAERS, the public? Is that correct?
Again, I'm not sure who or to what you are replying. I didn't state anything like that. But VAERS data is easily misinterpreted, because it is can be very difficult to interpret, depending on what you are looking for. That is no fault of those that took the trouble to report.
I was trying to YOU. I asked you a question wrote comments on this thread, you should know a little of where I am.
You haven't answered the question, you wrote the same thing.
FDA and the CDC, it's/was their responsibility to monitor VAERS m, interpret it. Though I'd be hard pressed to know who at the FDA is capable ! The CDC and the W H.O. (yes I know we aren't discussing the W.H.O) are crap entities AND you should read (you may call it research) about it. I did a research paper back in nursing school. They didn't like it, too bad.
When statements like yours are made, it's sets a tone. Yes, I know about causality. Nobody needs an -ologist degree to look at a set of data.
Standard protocol was IGNORED.
DR. Jessica Rose did an excellent job at interpreting the data way back. She has several -ologist degrees, and even a doctorate.
People have eyes, the power of observation, at last count I had lost 6 friends, women, they died in their damn sleep. In case you don't know, often heart attacks hit early morning hours.
I have a mother who got the shots despite my evidence that I put together to detour her.
She has been hospitalized 5x, five times. She came home with covidsmovid & pneumonia and Paxlovid in Dec. Her last visit to the hospital was in Feb, a direct result as far as I'm concerned DUE TO Paxlovid.
I have amassed the pieces to the puzzle, I was AWARE of something 36 yrs ago when I noticed the dumbing down of society. There is only one reason why you want people dumbed down.
Manipulation, easier to brainwash. So that they fall into the mindset that a reporting system is not for public consumption.
OK, but I don't think I am saying what you see that I am saying. I am not saying anyone lied when making their VAERS reports. That's our government officials attempting to discredit those who were able to file reports. Their judgement is coming.
I am, however, a professional database developer and I am familiar with the challenges involved in interpreting data extracted from government databases like VAERS, even when the data isn't being intentionally manipulated. In the past I have done this kind of work myself in connection with other federal and state health-related databases. I am saying that the people behind whichever website originally made the "143,233% increase in cancers" claim may have misinterpreted the data.
Jessica Rose, on the other hand, has done an excellent job of extracting and sifting the data to the extent possible, in spite of the difficulties, and she has described those difficulties in detail. Ask her what she thinks of the "143,233% increase" claim.
If you want to see the reasoning behind the 143,233% figure, you can find it at https://expose-news.com/2023/09/22/us-gov-confirms-143233x-increase-cancer-cases-due-to-covid-vaccination
I'll leave it to you as to whether it makes sense.
I am certainly not saying that there has not been an increase in cancers. I can see that there has been, directly, from the prayer lists of my present and former churches. Also I have lost friends and associates to that increase, and I have attended two of their memorials. Others that I know are battling cancer now, and quite possibly losing, and from what I can tell the situation is worsening year by year.
I have never seen anything like this before. In my church's prayer list this week we had two "died suddenlies" (a record, I think) and so many cases of brain cancer that I started to lose count, and that was only a fraction of the total cancer-related prayer requests. Still, it's not a 143 thousand percent increase.
Easy to misinterpret the data?
Oh I believe the number I just know that nobody from the Fed gov said it's due to the shots like the OP wrote.
My brain spit out an error & froze. Let's entertain a few guesses by removing one zero at a time & rounding her percentage off to 140, 14 and 1.4. There are over 600,00 cancer deaths in US. 140x = 84 million, 14x = 8.4 million, 1.4 = 840k. 84 million is heading towards Deagle's 2025 US depopulation forecast. 8.4M is a lot, but 240k more than usual seems low, all things considered.
Of course this is all moot, because extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof and she provided none.
Typo or not, it is an increase, and not by a little.
🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏❤️🙏 Praying
Why not give the direct link to the CHD interview instead of via Rumble?
Why? Do you think they doctored the one on Rumble? Many people who put out things will run it on YouTube=Google, Rumble, and Instagram.
YouTube demonetizes ppl's vids every minute of the day. They are so far left, they are criminals.
No, I think you misunderstand. My point was this interview originated with CHD (Childrens Health Defence) whose website is free to all and so I felt it would be more straightforward to provide readers with their direct link, rather than go through a third party (including ads) like Rumble.
LIABILITY. ACCOUNTABILITY. FULLEST MEASURE!!! HANG THEM ALL
Nobody is ever going to be held accountable, I've been saying this since '21.
I'm not sure whayt it is that people aren't getting.
That's your inner voice that's been screaming, time to listen to it. For those that don't or can't, all are lost causes and may as well go to Davos and get your lithium mining jumpsuit.
I will not assimilate.
I watched this hoping she would go into the numbers, but it was just a "by the way" at the very end. I am wondering what this report is that she is referencing and where this large percentage increase is documented. One thing I have learned over the last 4 years is you have to check it out yourself.
Well, you can look at some things Edward Dowd has put out. He takes a lot of data from the actuaries. If anyone KNOWS numbers, it would be actuaries. You can look at death numbers yourself, start on a non covidsmovid year. They group by age, type of cancer, and do some right math.
I don't understand, do you people still believe in shots? Do you not believe that they have killed millions through primary and secondary ways?
"You people"? Thanks. No, I don't believe in the shots, not even close. My comment was directed to the fact that the whole headline of the story was "US government data confirms...." but then the interview went on and on, and the government data was not presented and only barely mentioned as an afterthought at the end. In other words, the headline was misleading, and the "government data" and its source was not presented at all, even though it was the title of the show.
I apologize. Don't get your hackles up, 🤣😂. It kind of came off just a tad, a smidgeon like troll.
I hope you accept my apology.
I do accept your apology. Thank you!
Lets assume that there are 200,000 new cancer patients each year. A 143,000% increase would mean approximately 280 million new patients. Even spread out over the last 44 months of mRNA injections, that is over 6 million new patients every month. The math does not work very well.
A 143,000% increase is an increase of 1,430 for each previous instance. Assuming that there are usually 500,000 new cases every year, a 143,000% increase means 700 million news cases which is double the country's population. Maybe we all have cancer X's two. This number of 143,000% makes no sense that I can see.
Ah I see you're scratching your head like me on the numbers. I just posted a similar back-of-envelope sanity-check and the sanity's just not there.
There is no where near or there wasn't 500K cases of cancer every year. You can look these numbers up yourself. Take a year that covidsmovid wasn't around, 2019 for example. They group cancer by age and type, probably other ways, but these 2 categories I know. Do some right math.
#Diabolical
In 2021, the American Cancer Society's Facts & Figures annual report estimated that the number of new US cancer cases and deaths in 2022 would be an estimated 1.9 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 609,360 deaths.
Taking this as a very rough baseline for purposes of deriving an order-of-magnitude, if you multiply the new diagnoses figure by 144,000%, you get:
1,900,000 × 1,444 = 2.74 billion new cancer diagnoses
The population of the US is about 333 million. so that's about 8.3 new cancer diagnoses per American. I'm either doing the math wrong or I'm missing something.
How does the math look if we consider her number to be a typo? How about 143% or 1430%...?
That's not how stats work. First, there are age categories where cancer rates were low, and that's where figures are astronomical.
That 1400/1 increase in cancer diagnosis is difficult to conceive of. There wouldn't be enough doctors to diagnose that many people. Cancer rates were well above 1/1400 before the injections. How many cancer diagnoses do we all have? If we all have cancer 100x this number is conceivable.
Hi LoJ. I used to be on a couple of dozen newsletters/substacks, but now you, a couple other substacks, and Epoch Times' newsletter are all I watch regularly. (And I rely on your headlines far more than I do ET's.)
Thank you for your Iron Maiden diligence and consistency. You often break news before I see it anywhere else.
I'd like you to know what Facebook has been doing lately. Maybe 2 out of 4 or 5 times it accepts my posts that feature your articles, but as of last week it started deleting them almost immediately. Anything that Fuckbook doesn't like the "politics" of, it dubs as "spam". Three times last week. And of course the "See all (3)" button does nothing but go 'round in circles.
Sorry, tried to paste the image here but I guess that's not allowed in comments. It reads:
What happened
Aug 23, 2024
We removed some content or messages
Spam
Post removed
Aug 23, 2024
Spam
Post removed
Aug 23, 2024
Spam
Post removed
Aug 23, 2024
I spent a total of 8 months in FB jail, really more than that, I didn't add up the day here, 3 days there,
Sorry, tapped send by accident. The 8 months were month long FB jail time. Then there are the posts that they removed citing partially false.
EVERY SINGLE ONE WAS 100% TRUTH.
Even now, I will occasionally share something from another platform, nobody sees it.
Zuckerbook Mr. Climate Change is a sellout and a hypocrite.
My proof is his new 278 ft yacht which runs on 4 diesel engines.
Yeah, the pissant schmuck doesn't care, as long as we keep showing up for him to flash ads at. He gets $$ regardless. It's one of the ways to tell who is bullshitting and who isn't. Don't pay attention to what they say -- see if *they* do. Disregard of their own content, no matter how self-contradictory, hypocritical, flip-flop, bizarre, or asinine -- as long as it comes close to the bull$(hit)eye -- all good to them.
Whenever I quote Chd or Kennedy, my 79year old mom said it all lies. It is a struggle to challenge the brainwashed and boosted.
Master plan [DEPOPULATION] PROBLEM REACTION SOLUTIOn
INTRODUCTION
Problem : Crystalized micro plasma Dod funded 45% infected!
SOLUTIONS To [Saltutions]
Wash and clean food low micro biome low minerals! Low potassium cellular pump!!! Cell can’t clean optimally
Introduce pesticides to further kill bugs and biome !Gut health[ severed
Radioactive Salt pumped into Cell to cause cancer. Salt added caking agent to prevent Vit C uptake!
Introduce Glyphosate and Gmo ☠️ POISIN SALT to break down cyp 450 in the gut noPREVENT UPTAKE of Vit D n B12 Destroys ability to make hormones (fat n lazy) and all immune response to clean cell! B-12 happiness and Connection to God via Csf fluid!
FAKE OR BAD OIL
CAMPAIGN[Mass PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE]
FOR
LOW SALT DIET
CHOLESTEROL
Target mothers to get children
Chlorine / Sunscreen
Against sugar
🥩 Beef
Good seeds walnuts peacans
Margarine = [ Nickle ]
SEED oils
Vaccines Futher destruction introduce toxins to tbe cell enter sacrilegious Medium dna and metals direct blood stream bypassing gut response and cleanse mechanisms Then Mnra Vaxx or death shot to alter Gods Code
Bio weapon tbe Common cold or flu
Solution: med is sin to make infertility.
Statins
Die abeaties
1970s Unfinished agenda sponsored by the Rockefeller foundation Chapter: Population How Many is too many Chapter on Food Vaccines Health Care
Kissinger Controll the food controll the people control media control the minds control the banks control the world !
Have you seen the latest reports about how bad seed oils are?
You need to go way back further than 70's.
Read this and if you're interested I will point you in the direction.
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION THROUGH MEDICINE.
How do you have more then 100 % of anything??
Okay, it's about the percentage increase. And a % can be over a 100.
Floxed by mpox shots... nothing surprises me anymore. https://open.substack.com/pub/wholistic/p/alert-mpox-vaccine-contains-trace-amounts-of-cipro?r=12gs9a&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web