80 Comments

.

My favorite parts of Covid:

#89

Waiting …

For Life Insurance Companies

To Announce GoFundMe Accounts

.

Expand full comment

But the mRNA cancer and bird flu vaccines are coming.

Expand full comment

Plans can change?

Expand full comment

Those are for sheep who haven’t died from the convid jibbys yet! 😎💯

Expand full comment

We gave you cancer from the previous jab. Here’s more jabs to cure your cancer we gave you! Thanks for playing stupid human tricks with your health! 😎💯

Expand full comment

Yeah they are coming Eric Eric, its a carbon copy plan of C-19. If anyone is so stupid to believe this one this time around - go and get jabbed, no sympathy from me.

Expand full comment

We all may be living in a creekbed together without our digital ID’s but at least we are wise and resourceful!

Expand full comment

That's comforting... Still, it might be a bit soon to celebrate...

So, what does all this mean, when ALL "vaccines" have been just about moot for well over two years?

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/no-need-for-any-more-vaccinations

Expand full comment

I have heard of a couple rather recent cases where hospital policy exists that all transplant patients must have a Covid jab or it's not happening. It appears they wait until the transplant is located before they inform that they have a mandatory COVID-19 jab policy for all transplants.

Expand full comment

Wicked and cruel.

Expand full comment

We can't relax as long as Bill Gates and his mosquitos are around.

Expand full comment

They also sprayed Tennessee with edible rabies vax from planes I think it was late 2023 and they made sure they sprayed over the state lines in all the surrounding states--that was before TN passed its anti-air pollution law without any teeth.

Vaccines have a tendency to cause the disease that they are supposed to stop--some more and some less. They sprayed this so that the children could pick it up and put it in their mouths saying it was for wild animals. I cynically think they are trying to create rabies in people to point to the safety need of others to control those infected with rabies against their willpower, which would be unConstitutional given that the Constitution identifies our rights to make informed medical choices given to us by our Creator.

Expand full comment

This is beyond horrible.

Expand full comment

Woulda , coulda, shoulda … so many maimed and dead , and the ACOG still wants every pregnant woman jabbed despite the data .

Expand full comment

Too much money in it. Besides, never admit fault.

Expand full comment

Deny, deny, deny....

Expand full comment

Can’t reverse paralysis. Someone I know!

Expand full comment

Fantastic news..... thank you.

Expand full comment

"...Robert F Kennedy Jr has privately expressed concerns about the vaccines and signaled he is open to axing them if the data supports it."

"If the data supports it"????!!!!

What???!!!

Expand full comment

He is an attorney, timing and wording matter. As data gathering improves, he can show proof and not be called a conspiracy theorist. He is being smart, no point coming out with guns blazing only to face the armoured vehicles of Fauci and the left.

Expand full comment
3dEdited

Haven't Lioness and others already put in the public domain more than enough proof over the last five years to create very reasonable doubt, even for the most skeptical attorney?!

Expand full comment

Legal matters are not that simple. That is exactly why we have attorneys.

Expand full comment
3dEdited

Of course. The law is a control mechanism of, by and for our rulers. That is exactly why we have attorneys and legalese. If the law were based on transparency, simplicity and common sense, it would be more difficult to keep the wool pulled.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VKNF5mEXA4

Expand full comment

Pity modern comedy isn't wholesome, it is full of foul language, comedy for the late '50's so different, more innocent.

Expand full comment

Well, if the "data" comes from Big Pharma it'll be their own marking of their cut and paste homework, won't it?

Expand full comment

VAERS data doesn't come from pharma though. He is going to change the VAERS system to make it easier for doctors to use. There should be penalties if they fail to report.

Expand full comment

In written replies we often don't spot the tongue-in-cheek remark. Mine was one of those. I might also have said, "It depends what questions are asked and to whom?" Encapsulated in my snarky remark that if Big Pharma have anything to do with it, the answer will fit very nicely with their business. The letting of the VAERS programming contract has been controversial for many decades. Now, is that supplier problems, the way the contract was worded or suppliers gaming the contract to their own ends? Platitudes, Xyz is going to make it easier for abc....are exactly that, platitudes.

Expand full comment

We will see how it plays out with RJK Jr. it is still early days.

Expand full comment

That's the answer from those who are illiterate or if they are literate - paid to lie the ass off. "The more I kill, the more money I get and the higher I am promoted in position."

Expand full comment

It has all got to be published and shown on the MAINSCAM 'entertainment' press.

The abusers who run them will be done when that happens.

WE know but THEY the general population have a limited understanding because all their information is through that bias filter.

Keep on keeping on!

That's our job here. May love be with us all.

Expand full comment

🙌🏻

Expand full comment

Show us the proof Donny Boy.

Expand full comment

The truth is prevailing!

Expand full comment

That article is almost hilarious in its biased passive aggressive reporting.

To stop the jab is to admit harm done, and no one in charge wants to do that. Pharma is a gravy train like USAID is a gravy train, only with consequences like loss of licenses and jobs.

Expand full comment

A few years back the Daily Mail used to be known for critical reporting but has gone over to the dark side for a while, i.e. supporting the establishment view.

Expand full comment

Follow the money

Expand full comment

Good news is delightful.

Expand full comment

You say, "Other key advisors to Kennedy have promoted conspiratorial views..."

What makes them "conspiratorial"? Is that your bias?

Expand full comment

Anything that opposes reality is “conspiracy “ if it affects revenue.

Expand full comment

Lioness is transcribing what is written in the paper, click on "read more" to go directly to the paper. It's the Daily Mail, take with a grain of salt.

Expand full comment

A grain? Make that a boulder…

Expand full comment

True lol.

Expand full comment

They should have been banned as soon as 10 people were known to have died. Now they pretend there is not enough evidence to ban them and that they need to 'search' for evidence.

Expand full comment

Agreed. There was the 1955 Cutter Incident,

In 2017, the Philippines stopped a school-based dengue fever vaccination (kids died),

Early 1960s vaccine was eventually withdrawn,

Also in 1960's respiratory syncytial virus, there's still is no vaccine to prevent RSV infection. And they say they are working on it.

So why in the h3ll are they jabbing the crap out of our kids for RSV? They are not you f'kin guinea pigs!

Expand full comment

Yep, as soon as 'the data confirms'. Like, there's not quite enough obvious evidence....

Expand full comment

Covid vaccines COULD be suspended IF THERE IS EVIDENCE OF HARM.

And how is that evidence going to be provided? After all these years and millions of children harmed they STILL say there is NO PROOF vaccines cause autism.

Just like the US INTENDS to withdraw from The WHO. The US is NOT withdrawn.

Neither of these things have actually happened. It's intentionally vague.

Just like the EO about no more vaccine mandates in order to attend schools.

a) There are currently NO SCHOOLS mandating covid vaccines.

b) There is a clause that says they aren't mandated as long as covid is NO LONGER A THREAT.

Very tricky stuff here. It's known as "calming the mark".

Expand full comment

1% reporting on VAERS is poor evidence. They are going to change that, and they need to 'mandate' health professionals report to VAERS and make the system user friendly and far more streamlined.

Expand full comment

Doctors are continuing to request people to get the Bio-Digital Convergence Mind Control Shots and the serums having Lipid Nanoparticles made to surround Graphene, Polymers, Heavy Metals, Radiation and Algae Enzymes continue to be 'Crop Dusted' into our Atmosphere to poison EVERYTHING. Our food products as chickens and other livestock are being mutated with this toxic stew while plants in insects already spreading disease are being further hybridized to actually make the poisons themselves.

The 'EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT' of all organic life continues.

Expand full comment

Covid 'vaccines' don't prevent viral transmission, are not safe as they can result in harms such as cardiac arrest, strokes, miscarriage, neurological damage in a percentage of the population that is greater than 'rare.' Anti-viral medications when prescribed early can prevent or mitigate the worst symptoms of covid. Let's go with that and ban the duds. Yay, 'bout time.

Expand full comment

In my case

Heart attack, stroke, myocarditis, testicular cysts, mastocytosis, and more.

Expand full comment

Terrible, just a travesty. Dr. McCullough has a protocol to aid in ridding the body of the spikes that cause the damage. I know the LNP also causes inflammation.

Expand full comment

All doctors must be required to report symptoms that could be connected to the shots or face being sued and face a review of their licenses. Doctors are the diagnostic interface between patient symptoms and drugs. If they turn a blind eye, they are causing harm and failing in their profession. They could move on to a more suitable calling, one that embraces snakes in suits.

Expand full comment

Doctors rarely report.

Expand full comment

If they did, there would be no dispute and the knowledge would be commonplace, but they are maintaining a wall of secrecy contrary to the oath they have taken.

Expand full comment