It's rather frustrating to read about "nanotechnology finds" that are described by people having no idea what they are looking at or what existing nanotechnology actually looks like. Are they talking about medical nanotechnology, which does exist, or electronic nanotechnology, which is a different thing? Or are they just throwing out words?
Current semiconductor fabrication processes for CPUs are designated the the low nanometer range, on the order of 3 nm, but a micrograph of a silicon die doesn't look anything like the jumbled messes featured in these photos.
I worked in the chipmaking industry for a decade, not with the silicon directly but I supported CAD software for a time and viewed enough layout to have some idea of what nanometer-scale electronics look like. Processes improved from about 250 nm to 45 nm while I was working there, but that was quite a while ago.
I don't know what this stuff is that people keep finding in injectables, which is to be expected, but so far I don't have reason to think that it is electronic nanotechnology. It could be some other kind. It would be nice, for once, to have somebody that had a clue examining it.
Do not take the post partum depression drug by , ( not so wise ) Sage Pharmaceuticals.
Make as many "vaccines" as you want, assholes. The critical thinkers WILL NOT comply.
It's rather frustrating to read about "nanotechnology finds" that are described by people having no idea what they are looking at or what existing nanotechnology actually looks like. Are they talking about medical nanotechnology, which does exist, or electronic nanotechnology, which is a different thing? Or are they just throwing out words?
Current semiconductor fabrication processes for CPUs are designated the the low nanometer range, on the order of 3 nm, but a micrograph of a silicon die doesn't look anything like the jumbled messes featured in these photos.
I worked in the chipmaking industry for a decade, not with the silicon directly but I supported CAD software for a time and viewed enough layout to have some idea of what nanometer-scale electronics look like. Processes improved from about 250 nm to 45 nm while I was working there, but that was quite a while ago.
I don't know what this stuff is that people keep finding in injectables, which is to be expected, but so far I don't have reason to think that it is electronic nanotechnology. It could be some other kind. It would be nice, for once, to have somebody that had a clue examining it.
Thanks for all the great links!
Sounds like a red herring. Warning the real intel ? Maybe ?