38 Comments
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Sam ~ I just found this nugget last week from another commenter here on Substack. It fits in with your post :)

“A doctor gave a man six months to live. The man couldn't pay his bill, so the doctor gave him another six months.”

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Yes, Catherine! Your physician is looking back at you. In the mirror.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2023Liked by Lioness of Judah Ministry

Excellent...TY so much for posting!

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2023Liked by Lioness of Judah Ministry

Also, of course, cancer. From an article by Walter Last:

It is generally accepted in cancer research that the vast majority of patients or about 90% die from metastases or secondary tumours, and only a small minority from a primary tumour. Therefore it should be of great concern to therapists as well as patients that already more than 30 years ago it was conclusively shown that cancer surgery is the main cause of metastasis.

The article link no longer works, but I uploaded it to my googledrive:

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hgXS_o-OpEaLIuIv6u5aC-QGAePO-UZo?usp=sharing

Expand full comment

Thank you. I've heard of this theory before but with other growths in the body. The more we cut the more we make it worse.

Expand full comment

Most welcome. Biopsies are also problematic in this respect; I wonder how many have had their primary cancers spread due this 'essential' diagnostic procedure.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment

According to the article:

It has long been taught in medicine that a melanoma should not be injured since lesions would cause an almost explosion-like growth of metastases.

Could it be your friend was unfortunate and maybe banged the affected area so it was directly hit?

As far as regrowth goes, that might say more about your immune system, than any treatment given. It is at least possible if it had not been removed, and somehow protected from injury, it would neither have grown or metastasised.

Certainly, the mRNA-induced turbo-cancers, which hardly ever respond to the usual treatments, are thought to be mainly due to suppressed immune systems. Put another way, their conventional treatments only ever work in people with good immune systems which can fight the residual cancer cells after chemo etc.

So, if an immune system damaged by the treatment is still able to deal with vastly fewer cancer cells (at least for years/decades), how about not damaging it in the first place?

This is the holistic alternative to the allopathic madness, and of course makes sense. Building the immune system up is usually not so difficult, the problem then is to shrink the number of cancer cells to a manageable level. There are various ways, but maybe the most effective, and certainly cheapest, alternative is long-term fasting (+ urine for serious conditions). The body eats the damaged/cancerous cells and replaces them with stem cells. Once enough are gone, the immune system should be able to destroy, or barricade off, the remaining ones.

Books and testimonials can be found here:

https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#_Ref40644295

https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#bkmrk110

Expand full comment

I would say 99.99 percent. It's pretty well a given from what I've see.

Expand full comment
founding
Dec 1, 2023Liked by Lioness of Judah Ministry

My mother seemed to think of surgery as the path to perfection? The difficulty I had was never knowing which surgery would put her ahead or which would set her back. Case in point - she got a 3 lead pacemaker that turned the clock back at least 10 years. It was miraculous. Right from waking up, her normally icy cold hands were warm, her eyesight improved and her mind was back. Then years later, some radiologist lost hold of a coil and sliced up her entire large intestine trying to retrieve it. Ghastly death.

The problem is - how can you determine what health care you require? You leave it to your doctor. My mother passed in 2018. Then covid. Now the odds never seem to be in our favor. I’m done with all of it.

Expand full comment

I guess acute life or death occurrences. I've had 5 joint replacements. I don't regret any of them. I would have lost my ability to walk due to pain and lack of joint mobility. I also had a hernia surgery a few years ago which definitely needed to be done. Without it I would have had intestine strangulation which can turn deadly. Each person had to weigh the pros and cons. After what we have seen in the last few years I would have to be unconscious and taken to a hospital without my permission. I no longer trust anything within the medical complex. I warned my husband that it I am ever diagnosed with cancer I will choose no treatment. A well known expert said that the majority of cancer patients die from the side effects of treatment rather than the cancer itself. What does that tell us?

Expand full comment
founding

That’s pretty much where I am, too. But in turning my back on the medical system, I’m finding there are others offering different ideas that are intriguing. I’m finding doctors focussed on light, electricity, energy, etc. When I look at the abysmal record of our centralized medical system, I figure it can’t be worse. And I’m getting really annoyed at all these entities - government, medical, big tech - that feel they have a right to all my data.

Expand full comment

Coleman was so refreshing to read again that I couldn't help complementing his article yesterday:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/unnecessary-surgeries

Expand full comment

I love and appreciate your stack, Ray! All of your posts, that is.

Expand full comment

And the emphasis is on "their" inability to handle things in the long run, which is why they'll fail miserably, but probably only after they "succeed":

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end

Thank you for your kind words; I'm only doing what I can.

Expand full comment

Get a few consults and if it's necessary, pick someone if possible that treats you like a human!

Expand full comment

🙌🔥❤️

Expand full comment

Excellent article. Except for the part about vegan diets for heart health. I know Dr. Coleman is himself vegan and a big believer, but the politicized faux science that led to the adoption of the first US Nutritional Guidelines has been a disaster for human health. There is now a huge movement of physicians, scientists and regular folks worldwide regaining health, getting off prescription meds, losing weight, and recovering from supposedly irreversible diseases (like diabetes, a large range of autoimmune diseases, etc.) by reintroducing animal foods & saturated fats into their diets, removing all vegetable oils and sugars, and following low carb ketogenic and/or carnivore diets. There are increasing numbers of cardiologists among these MDs as well.

Expand full comment

I also am vegan and a big believer. 15 years now for my hubby and I eating “whole food plant based”. Watch T Colin Campbell describe his experiments on mice and cancer. Feed animal protein, 100% of mice get cancer. Switch them to plant protein, 100% of them recover. And every version of the experiment that he could think of. This is a man of high integrity, and I trust him, and am grateful for the work he has done.

Expand full comment

Eat how you prefer. Believe what you like.

But as you reference a mouse study on cancer: if you should ever have the intellectual curiosity to explore alternative approaches, you can find multiple video interviews with Dr. Thomas Seyfried (Boston College professor of biology, genetics & biochemistry) who conducts ongoing research as well as working with clinicians worldwide helping cancer patients using ketogenic diets as the foundation of a coordinated treatment protocol. Or you could read his textbook: "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer ". Dr. Seyfried's work builds on the Nobel-Prizewinning work of German scientist Otto Warburg a century ago.

Expand full comment
Dec 1, 2023·edited Dec 1, 2023

Thank you for the references. It would be great for all of us if we had clarity on what is most healthful. The confusion is probably not an accident, and I hope we all find the truth to help us through these difficult times.

Expand full comment

"The confusion is probably not an accident"

I agree completely. The most likely reason Otto Warburg's discoveries were "disappeared" likely had to do with the fact that metabolic therapies are not anywhere near so lucrative as drugs & surgery based on "Cancer as a Genetic Disease" vs "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease".

As for nutritional science: I was a vegan for many years but it was the science that eventually persuaded me to stop. It can be an excellent shorter term Elimination Diet that can heal many conditions. But in the long-run it can lead to serious nutritional deficiencies, especially for women who become more vulnerable to loss of bone mineral density (that can lead to osteoporosis, teeth issues, etc), hormonal issues, etc. If you are interested to learn more about how the US government came out with the Nutritional Guidelines in the 1970s, Nina Teicholz spent 10 years researching ALL the studies, their methodologies, conclusions, etc. and produced an award-winning heavily footnoted, 500-page masterpiece (that reads like a Grisham novel) called: "The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet".

As for heart health there is a lot of research showing that among the elderly those with higher overall cholesterol levels have fewer cardiovascular issues. That would seem counter-intuitive until you read Nina Teicholz' book and realize the "science" behind the Heart-Health Hypothesis was more like political science than legit natural science, pushing Ancel Keye's agenda and the personal belief system of Senator McGovern's vegan Chief of Staff. All OK with Big Pharma & Big Med. Selling Statins & surgery is MUCH more lucrative than encouraging lifestyle improvements backed by rigorous science AND widespread clinical results in the real world.

Expand full comment
founding

Whenever I come across a vegan vs carnivore debate, I always wonder just what was fed in the studies. How carefully was the food sourced? Was it organic? If meat, was it factory farmed? Were any of the foods processed? They never tell you. I also wonder if all people are the same. I have seen people get so much energy from meat, but then others just feel and look like death on it. My sense is to listen to your own body and don’t follow people who advise something but look really unhealthy themselves.

Expand full comment

Good questions, and I agree with your thought to consider how people look!

Expand full comment

Agreed. I was vegetarian for two decades, even vegan for long periods of time. All it did was make me overweight and (type 2) diabetic.

I feel much better since eating meat again as part of a balanced keto diet. I no longer need medication to keep my blood sugar levels in normal range, my blood pressure is normal again, I've lost weight, and I have a lot more energy.

Expand full comment

I was about to comment the same exact thing. Was reading through them to check if anyone said “except for the vegan diet part”.

Expand full comment

And I have to say, carnivore or animal-centric traditional diets without any seed oils, very little if any vegetation, fermented foods, lots of it raw, seasonal, pure water too... it really transforms you. I’ve been vegan for years (LONG time ago), both raw and cooked- made me horribly suicidal and depressed and hopeless, and eventually, overweight. Carnivore is the way.

Expand full comment

BS!! Watch the movie "What the Health". It will open your eyes about animal protein. And read 'The China Study" by Colin Campbell. He was able to prove that a diet with over 20% animal protein caused tumors to grow.

As a 13 year cancer survivor who avoids doctors like the plague I went from an Animal protein diet to a whole foods plant diet and have never looked back.

Expand full comment

Lot of truth here , unfortunately.

Expand full comment

Given the state of the NHS and the known Agenda in Britain l would only attend a hospital for life saving surgery .. but the two “may” be diametrically opposed! I wouldn’t necessarily expect to wake up! Now, privately you do stand a slightly better chance as they operate “on their own” in these settings.

Expand full comment

Plus there's the fact that many operations require blood transfusions, and most unvaxxed patients don't have access to donated unvaxxed blood.

Expand full comment

Dr C. The voice of reason. Always 💕

Expand full comment

Iatrogenic cases are epidemic. Incompetent Medical Doctors are the product of Incompetent Medical Schools.

Expand full comment

Great article. 100% true. What a shame the last sentence had to be so crass. I would share it if it weren't for that sentence. Thank you for posting. The world needs to know this.

Expand full comment

Not to mention the obvious abomination of ahem,cosmetic(cough, choke,sputter) surgery for the insecure aging feminists who have themselves facially mutilated because their idiotic collectivist friends do it. Gotta have something to bitch about between psych appointments.

Expand full comment