Also, of course, cancer. From an article by Walter Last:
It is generally accepted in cancer research that the vast majority of patients or about 90% die from metastases or secondary tumours, and only a small minority from a primary tumour. Therefore it should be of great concern to therapists as well as patients that already more than 30 years ago it was conclusively shown that cancer surgery is the main cause of metastasis.
The article link no longer works, but I uploaded it to my googledrive:
Most welcome. Biopsies are also problematic in this respect; I wonder how many have had their primary cancers spread due this 'essential' diagnostic procedure.
Does that apply to removing malignant skin cancers? I thought if they were allowed to grow they would metastasize inside the body. A friend died because his doctor kept ignoring his and it metastasized inside his body. It was a gruesome death.
I had one removed from my arm 3 years ago and I haven’t had any new ones.
It has long been taught in medicine that a melanoma should not be injured since lesions would cause an almost explosion-like growth of metastases.
Could it be your friend was unfortunate and maybe banged the affected area so it was directly hit?
As far as regrowth goes, that might say more about your immune system, than any treatment given. It is at least possible if it had not been removed, and somehow protected from injury, it would neither have grown or metastasised.
Certainly, the mRNA-induced turbo-cancers, which hardly ever respond to the usual treatments, are thought to be mainly due to suppressed immune systems. Put another way, their conventional treatments only ever work in people with good immune systems which can fight the residual cancer cells after chemo etc.
So, if an immune system damaged by the treatment is still able to deal with vastly fewer cancer cells (at least for years/decades), how about not damaging it in the first place?
This is the holistic alternative to the allopathic madness, and of course makes sense. Building the immune system up is usually not so difficult, the problem then is to shrink the number of cancer cells to a manageable level. There are various ways, but maybe the most effective, and certainly cheapest, alternative is long-term fasting (+ urine for serious conditions). The body eats the damaged/cancerous cells and replaces them with stem cells. Once enough are gone, the immune system should be able to destroy, or barricade off, the remaining ones.
Thank you for your reply. It was removed 3 years ago and I have found no others. And it was growing fast. My immune system seems robust since I just had my first cold in over 20 years and the symptoms were very mild. But I took ivermectin and vitamins and it was gone in 3 days. I’m unjabbed and I agree with you about the turbo cancers and chemo treatments. Just ghastly.
As for my friend it was years ago and I only heard about from another friend so I don’t know the details, but it had spread inside and the death was awful.
And thanks for the links. Any idea how I find a naturalist doctor? I’m having other problems and want to stay away from big pharma junk.
My mother seemed to think of surgery as the path to perfection? The difficulty I had was never knowing which surgery would put her ahead or which would set her back. Case in point - she got a 3 lead pacemaker that turned the clock back at least 10 years. It was miraculous. Right from waking up, her normally icy cold hands were warm, her eyesight improved and her mind was back. Then years later, some radiologist lost hold of a coil and sliced up her entire large intestine trying to retrieve it. Ghastly death.
The problem is - how can you determine what health care you require? You leave it to your doctor. My mother passed in 2018. Then covid. Now the odds never seem to be in our favor. I’m done with all of it.
I guess acute life or death occurrences. I've had 5 joint replacements. I don't regret any of them. I would have lost my ability to walk due to pain and lack of joint mobility. I also had a hernia surgery a few years ago which definitely needed to be done. Without it I would have had intestine strangulation which can turn deadly. Each person had to weigh the pros and cons. After what we have seen in the last few years I would have to be unconscious and taken to a hospital without my permission. I no longer trust anything within the medical complex. I warned my husband that it I am ever diagnosed with cancer I will choose no treatment. A well known expert said that the majority of cancer patients die from the side effects of treatment rather than the cancer itself. What does that tell us?
That’s pretty much where I am, too. But in turning my back on the medical system, I’m finding there are others offering different ideas that are intriguing. I’m finding doctors focussed on light, electricity, energy, etc. When I look at the abysmal record of our centralized medical system, I figure it can’t be worse. And I’m getting really annoyed at all these entities - government, medical, big tech - that feel they have a right to all my data.
And the emphasis is on "their" inability to handle things in the long run, which is why they'll fail miserably, but probably only after they "succeed":
Excellent article. Except for the part about vegan diets for heart health. I know Dr. Coleman is himself vegan and a big believer, but the politicized faux science that led to the adoption of the first US Nutritional Guidelines has been a disaster for human health. There is now a huge movement of physicians, scientists and regular folks worldwide regaining health, getting off prescription meds, losing weight, and recovering from supposedly irreversible diseases (like diabetes, a large range of autoimmune diseases, etc.) by reintroducing animal foods & saturated fats into their diets, removing all vegetable oils and sugars, and following low carb ketogenic and/or carnivore diets. There are increasing numbers of cardiologists among these MDs as well.
I also am vegan and a big believer. 15 years now for my hubby and I eating “whole food plant based”. Watch T Colin Campbell describe his experiments on mice and cancer. Feed animal protein, 100% of mice get cancer. Switch them to plant protein, 100% of them recover. And every version of the experiment that he could think of. This is a man of high integrity, and I trust him, and am grateful for the work he has done.
But as you reference a mouse study on cancer: if you should ever have the intellectual curiosity to explore alternative approaches, you can find multiple video interviews with Dr. Thomas Seyfried (Boston College professor of biology, genetics & biochemistry) who conducts ongoing research as well as working with clinicians worldwide helping cancer patients using ketogenic diets as the foundation of a coordinated treatment protocol. Or you could read his textbook: "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer ". Dr. Seyfried's work builds on the Nobel-Prizewinning work of German scientist Otto Warburg a century ago.
Thank you for the references. It would be great for all of us if we had clarity on what is most healthful. The confusion is probably not an accident, and I hope we all find the truth to help us through these difficult times.
I agree completely. The most likely reason Otto Warburg's discoveries were "disappeared" likely had to do with the fact that metabolic therapies are not anywhere near so lucrative as drugs & surgery based on "Cancer as a Genetic Disease" vs "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease".
As for nutritional science: I was a vegan for many years but it was the science that eventually persuaded me to stop. It can be an excellent shorter term Elimination Diet that can heal many conditions. But in the long-run it can lead to serious nutritional deficiencies, especially for women who become more vulnerable to loss of bone mineral density (that can lead to osteoporosis, teeth issues, etc), hormonal issues, etc. If you are interested to learn more about how the US government came out with the Nutritional Guidelines in the 1970s, Nina Teicholz spent 10 years researching ALL the studies, their methodologies, conclusions, etc. and produced an award-winning heavily footnoted, 500-page masterpiece (that reads like a Grisham novel) called: "The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet".
As for heart health there is a lot of research showing that among the elderly those with higher overall cholesterol levels have fewer cardiovascular issues. That would seem counter-intuitive until you read Nina Teicholz' book and realize the "science" behind the Heart-Health Hypothesis was more like political science than legit natural science, pushing Ancel Keye's agenda and the personal belief system of Senator McGovern's vegan Chief of Staff. All OK with Big Pharma & Big Med. Selling Statins & surgery is MUCH more lucrative than encouraging lifestyle improvements backed by rigorous science AND widespread clinical results in the real world.
Whenever I come across a vegan vs carnivore debate, I always wonder just what was fed in the studies. How carefully was the food sourced? Was it organic? If meat, was it factory farmed? Were any of the foods processed? They never tell you. I also wonder if all people are the same. I have seen people get so much energy from meat, but then others just feel and look like death on it. My sense is to listen to your own body and don’t follow people who advise something but look really unhealthy themselves.
Agreed. I was vegetarian for two decades, even vegan for long periods of time. All it did was make me overweight and (type 2) diabetic.
I feel much better since eating meat again as part of a balanced keto diet. I no longer need medication to keep my blood sugar levels in normal range, my blood pressure is normal again, I've lost weight, and I have a lot more energy.
And I have to say, carnivore or animal-centric traditional diets without any seed oils, very little if any vegetation, fermented foods, lots of it raw, seasonal, pure water too... it really transforms you. I’ve been vegan for years (LONG time ago), both raw and cooked- made me horribly suicidal and depressed and hopeless, and eventually, overweight. Carnivore is the way.
BS!! Watch the movie "What the Health". It will open your eyes about animal protein. And read 'The China Study" by Colin Campbell. He was able to prove that a diet with over 20% animal protein caused tumors to grow.
As a 13 year cancer survivor who avoids doctors like the plague I went from an Animal protein diet to a whole foods plant diet and have never looked back.
I broke my ankle a few years ago while walking at the cemetery in winter. They agreed to pay my medical bills so I saw an orthopedic surgeon. He immediately said that I needed surgery with pins, but I told him that I wasn’t sure yet on the insurance.
"No problem just wear this boot and I’ll see you in 2 weeks."
Well what do you know? He said it was healing fine and no surgery needed. I already had decided no surgery was necessary and especially with pins because they often get infected and need to be removed.
Given the state of the NHS and the known Agenda in Britain l would only attend a hospital for life saving surgery .. but the two “may” be diametrically opposed! I wouldn’t necessarily expect to wake up! Now, privately you do stand a slightly better chance as they operate “on their own” in these settings.
Great article. 100% true. What a shame the last sentence had to be so crass. I would share it if it weren't for that sentence. Thank you for posting. The world needs to know this.
Not to mention the obvious abomination of ahem,cosmetic(cough, choke,sputter) surgery for the insecure aging feminists who have themselves facially mutilated because their idiotic collectivist friends do it. Gotta have something to bitch about between psych appointments.
Yes, Catherine! Your physician is looking back at you. In the mirror.
Excellent...TY so much for posting!
Also, of course, cancer. From an article by Walter Last:
It is generally accepted in cancer research that the vast majority of patients or about 90% die from metastases or secondary tumours, and only a small minority from a primary tumour. Therefore it should be of great concern to therapists as well as patients that already more than 30 years ago it was conclusively shown that cancer surgery is the main cause of metastasis.
The article link no longer works, but I uploaded it to my googledrive:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hgXS_o-OpEaLIuIv6u5aC-QGAePO-UZo?usp=sharing
Thank you. I've heard of this theory before but with other growths in the body. The more we cut the more we make it worse.
Most welcome. Biopsies are also problematic in this respect; I wonder how many have had their primary cancers spread due this 'essential' diagnostic procedure.
Does that apply to removing malignant skin cancers? I thought if they were allowed to grow they would metastasize inside the body. A friend died because his doctor kept ignoring his and it metastasized inside his body. It was a gruesome death.
I had one removed from my arm 3 years ago and I haven’t had any new ones.
According to the article:
It has long been taught in medicine that a melanoma should not be injured since lesions would cause an almost explosion-like growth of metastases.
Could it be your friend was unfortunate and maybe banged the affected area so it was directly hit?
As far as regrowth goes, that might say more about your immune system, than any treatment given. It is at least possible if it had not been removed, and somehow protected from injury, it would neither have grown or metastasised.
Certainly, the mRNA-induced turbo-cancers, which hardly ever respond to the usual treatments, are thought to be mainly due to suppressed immune systems. Put another way, their conventional treatments only ever work in people with good immune systems which can fight the residual cancer cells after chemo etc.
So, if an immune system damaged by the treatment is still able to deal with vastly fewer cancer cells (at least for years/decades), how about not damaging it in the first place?
This is the holistic alternative to the allopathic madness, and of course makes sense. Building the immune system up is usually not so difficult, the problem then is to shrink the number of cancer cells to a manageable level. There are various ways, but maybe the most effective, and certainly cheapest, alternative is long-term fasting (+ urine for serious conditions). The body eats the damaged/cancerous cells and replaces them with stem cells. Once enough are gone, the immune system should be able to destroy, or barricade off, the remaining ones.
Books and testimonials can be found here:
https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#_Ref40644295
https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#bkmrk110
Thank you for your reply. It was removed 3 years ago and I have found no others. And it was growing fast. My immune system seems robust since I just had my first cold in over 20 years and the symptoms were very mild. But I took ivermectin and vitamins and it was gone in 3 days. I’m unjabbed and I agree with you about the turbo cancers and chemo treatments. Just ghastly.
As for my friend it was years ago and I only heard about from another friend so I don’t know the details, but it had spread inside and the death was awful.
And thanks for the links. Any idea how I find a naturalist doctor? I’m having other problems and want to stay away from big pharma junk.
I would say 99.99 percent. It's pretty well a given from what I've see.
My mother seemed to think of surgery as the path to perfection? The difficulty I had was never knowing which surgery would put her ahead or which would set her back. Case in point - she got a 3 lead pacemaker that turned the clock back at least 10 years. It was miraculous. Right from waking up, her normally icy cold hands were warm, her eyesight improved and her mind was back. Then years later, some radiologist lost hold of a coil and sliced up her entire large intestine trying to retrieve it. Ghastly death.
The problem is - how can you determine what health care you require? You leave it to your doctor. My mother passed in 2018. Then covid. Now the odds never seem to be in our favor. I’m done with all of it.
I guess acute life or death occurrences. I've had 5 joint replacements. I don't regret any of them. I would have lost my ability to walk due to pain and lack of joint mobility. I also had a hernia surgery a few years ago which definitely needed to be done. Without it I would have had intestine strangulation which can turn deadly. Each person had to weigh the pros and cons. After what we have seen in the last few years I would have to be unconscious and taken to a hospital without my permission. I no longer trust anything within the medical complex. I warned my husband that it I am ever diagnosed with cancer I will choose no treatment. A well known expert said that the majority of cancer patients die from the side effects of treatment rather than the cancer itself. What does that tell us?
That’s pretty much where I am, too. But in turning my back on the medical system, I’m finding there are others offering different ideas that are intriguing. I’m finding doctors focussed on light, electricity, energy, etc. When I look at the abysmal record of our centralized medical system, I figure it can’t be worse. And I’m getting really annoyed at all these entities - government, medical, big tech - that feel they have a right to all my data.
Coleman was so refreshing to read again that I couldn't help complementing his article yesterday:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/unnecessary-surgeries
I love and appreciate your stack, Ray! All of your posts, that is.
And the emphasis is on "their" inability to handle things in the long run, which is why they'll fail miserably, but probably only after they "succeed":
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-will-the-globalists-game-end
Thank you for your kind words; I'm only doing what I can.
me too!
Get a few consults and if it's necessary, pick someone if possible that treats you like a human!
🙌🔥❤️
Excellent article. Except for the part about vegan diets for heart health. I know Dr. Coleman is himself vegan and a big believer, but the politicized faux science that led to the adoption of the first US Nutritional Guidelines has been a disaster for human health. There is now a huge movement of physicians, scientists and regular folks worldwide regaining health, getting off prescription meds, losing weight, and recovering from supposedly irreversible diseases (like diabetes, a large range of autoimmune diseases, etc.) by reintroducing animal foods & saturated fats into their diets, removing all vegetable oils and sugars, and following low carb ketogenic and/or carnivore diets. There are increasing numbers of cardiologists among these MDs as well.
I also am vegan and a big believer. 15 years now for my hubby and I eating “whole food plant based”. Watch T Colin Campbell describe his experiments on mice and cancer. Feed animal protein, 100% of mice get cancer. Switch them to plant protein, 100% of them recover. And every version of the experiment that he could think of. This is a man of high integrity, and I trust him, and am grateful for the work he has done.
Eat how you prefer. Believe what you like.
But as you reference a mouse study on cancer: if you should ever have the intellectual curiosity to explore alternative approaches, you can find multiple video interviews with Dr. Thomas Seyfried (Boston College professor of biology, genetics & biochemistry) who conducts ongoing research as well as working with clinicians worldwide helping cancer patients using ketogenic diets as the foundation of a coordinated treatment protocol. Or you could read his textbook: "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer ". Dr. Seyfried's work builds on the Nobel-Prizewinning work of German scientist Otto Warburg a century ago.
Thank you for the references. It would be great for all of us if we had clarity on what is most healthful. The confusion is probably not an accident, and I hope we all find the truth to help us through these difficult times.
"The confusion is probably not an accident"
I agree completely. The most likely reason Otto Warburg's discoveries were "disappeared" likely had to do with the fact that metabolic therapies are not anywhere near so lucrative as drugs & surgery based on "Cancer as a Genetic Disease" vs "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease".
As for nutritional science: I was a vegan for many years but it was the science that eventually persuaded me to stop. It can be an excellent shorter term Elimination Diet that can heal many conditions. But in the long-run it can lead to serious nutritional deficiencies, especially for women who become more vulnerable to loss of bone mineral density (that can lead to osteoporosis, teeth issues, etc), hormonal issues, etc. If you are interested to learn more about how the US government came out with the Nutritional Guidelines in the 1970s, Nina Teicholz spent 10 years researching ALL the studies, their methodologies, conclusions, etc. and produced an award-winning heavily footnoted, 500-page masterpiece (that reads like a Grisham novel) called: "The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet".
As for heart health there is a lot of research showing that among the elderly those with higher overall cholesterol levels have fewer cardiovascular issues. That would seem counter-intuitive until you read Nina Teicholz' book and realize the "science" behind the Heart-Health Hypothesis was more like political science than legit natural science, pushing Ancel Keye's agenda and the personal belief system of Senator McGovern's vegan Chief of Staff. All OK with Big Pharma & Big Med. Selling Statins & surgery is MUCH more lucrative than encouraging lifestyle improvements backed by rigorous science AND widespread clinical results in the real world.
Whenever I come across a vegan vs carnivore debate, I always wonder just what was fed in the studies. How carefully was the food sourced? Was it organic? If meat, was it factory farmed? Were any of the foods processed? They never tell you. I also wonder if all people are the same. I have seen people get so much energy from meat, but then others just feel and look like death on it. My sense is to listen to your own body and don’t follow people who advise something but look really unhealthy themselves.
Good questions, and I agree with your thought to consider how people look!
Agreed. I was vegetarian for two decades, even vegan for long periods of time. All it did was make me overweight and (type 2) diabetic.
I feel much better since eating meat again as part of a balanced keto diet. I no longer need medication to keep my blood sugar levels in normal range, my blood pressure is normal again, I've lost weight, and I have a lot more energy.
I was about to comment the same exact thing. Was reading through them to check if anyone said “except for the vegan diet part”.
And I have to say, carnivore or animal-centric traditional diets without any seed oils, very little if any vegetation, fermented foods, lots of it raw, seasonal, pure water too... it really transforms you. I’ve been vegan for years (LONG time ago), both raw and cooked- made me horribly suicidal and depressed and hopeless, and eventually, overweight. Carnivore is the way.
BS!! Watch the movie "What the Health". It will open your eyes about animal protein. And read 'The China Study" by Colin Campbell. He was able to prove that a diet with over 20% animal protein caused tumors to grow.
As a 13 year cancer survivor who avoids doctors like the plague I went from an Animal protein diet to a whole foods plant diet and have never looked back.
I broke my ankle a few years ago while walking at the cemetery in winter. They agreed to pay my medical bills so I saw an orthopedic surgeon. He immediately said that I needed surgery with pins, but I told him that I wasn’t sure yet on the insurance.
"No problem just wear this boot and I’ll see you in 2 weeks."
Well what do you know? He said it was healing fine and no surgery needed. I already had decided no surgery was necessary and especially with pins because they often get infected and need to be removed.
Sam ~ I just found this nugget last week from another commenter here on Substack. It fits in with your post :)
“A doctor gave a man six months to live. The man couldn't pay his bill, so the doctor gave him another six months.”
Lot of truth here , unfortunately.
Given the state of the NHS and the known Agenda in Britain l would only attend a hospital for life saving surgery .. but the two “may” be diametrically opposed! I wouldn’t necessarily expect to wake up! Now, privately you do stand a slightly better chance as they operate “on their own” in these settings.
Plus there's the fact that many operations require blood transfusions, and most unvaxxed patients don't have access to donated unvaxxed blood.
Dr C. The voice of reason. Always 💕
Iatrogenic cases are epidemic. Incompetent Medical Doctors are the product of Incompetent Medical Schools.
Great article. 100% true. What a shame the last sentence had to be so crass. I would share it if it weren't for that sentence. Thank you for posting. The world needs to know this.
Not to mention the obvious abomination of ahem,cosmetic(cough, choke,sputter) surgery for the insecure aging feminists who have themselves facially mutilated because their idiotic collectivist friends do it. Gotta have something to bitch about between psych appointments.