The data shows millions have been disabled or murdered by the CV19 bioweapon/vax so far. Is it going to get worse? Kingston says, “Unfortunately, it is going to get worse. The worst is yet to come
Why were the Following So-Called Special and Elite Groups of People Were Exempted From Receiving The Cytotoxic, Genotoxic and Magnetic Toxic Graphene Oxide, PEGulated Hydrosol, mRNA Directed Bioweapon with Trypanosoma Parasite Eggs are listed below:
Group One Exempted:
All of the USA Congress plus all the Congressional Staff of the House & Senate and their families!!!!
Group Two Exempted:
The US President, Vice President, Cabinet and their families and the entire 26,000 Whitehouse Employees and their families!!!!
Group Three Exempted:
All officers and directors of Pfizer including 2500 Key Employees around the World and their families!!!!
Group Four Exempted:
All officers and directors of Moderna including 1,500 Key Moderna Employees and their families!!!!
Group Five Exempted:
All officers and directors of Johnson & Johnson including120,000 Employees and their families!!!!!
Group Six Exempted:
All key CDC officers and directors including15,000 Employees and their families!!!!!
Group Seven Exempted:
All officers and directors of the FDA and 14,000 FDA Employees and their families!!!!!
Group Eight Exempted:
Over 8 Million Chinese Students studying abroad!!!!
Group Nine Exempted:
Millions of Illegal invaders crossing over our borders into the USA!!!!
Group Ten Exempted:
Millions of Homeless & Tent Street People in the USA!!!!
"While advocates and some companies have been working to reduce methane emissions from food, cut down on food waste, increase capacity for producing alternative proteins and use bioengineering to make healthier and hardier crops and animals, goals like these have never before come from the White House …The federal government is providing more evidence that it intends to do more than just talk about big goals. A day before the report came out, FDA gave its second tacit approval to a company using biotechnology to grow meat from cells in bioreactors. While neither … is creating meat for consumers yet, this action shows that the federal government is moving toward making cultivated meat a reality."
Among the many problems with this plan is the fact that taxpayers will now be paying for government's funding of private corporations involved in the fake food industry. The end result is predictable. What we'll have is a repeat of what happened with farm subsidies. Rather than subsidizing the most nutritious foods, government farm subsidies go almost exclusively to large monoculture farms growing genetically engineered corn, soy and other basic ingredients used in processed foods. As a result, the processed food industry has grown on our dime while public health has deteriorated. The same thing could well happen here. Instead of investing in regenerative agriculture, which is what could really solve our problems, government is backing a whole new industry of fake foods, from lab-grown meats to large-scale insect production. At present, two cell-based lab-grown meat companies have received the green light to produce and sell fake chicken in the U.S. The first, Upside Foods (previously Memphis Meats), received FDA approval for its cell-based lab-grown chicken in November 2022. According to the FDA's November 14, 2022, memo: “We have no questions at this time about UPSIDE's conclusion that foods comprised of or containing cultured chicken cell material resulting from the production process … are as safe as comparable foods produced by other methods.”Dr. Uma Valeti, CEO and founder of Upside Foods, called the approval "a watershed moment in the history of food" and a "major step toward a new era in meat production." The company has a 53,000-square-foot facility in the San Francisco Bay Area capable of producing 400,000 pounds of fake meat per year. In March 2023, Eat Just — which has been selling its lab-grown chicken in Singapore since 2020 — also received FDA approval. The company is currently building a commercial-scale facility in the U.S. that will house 10 250,000-liter bioreactors.The problem with us consumers? Safety data is sorely lacking. While the U.S. government is moving full speed ahead with approvals for lab-grown meats, a Food Hazards Identification report by the British Food standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland, published in March 2023, warns there are "considerable gaps in knowledge" when it comes to cell-based meat production. As reported by Food Safety News March 24, 2023: "The purpose of the report was to identify hazards in the cultivated meat production process to help inform the FSA risk assessment process for authorization. It was also important that products do not pose any microbiological or chemical concerns. The research was based on a review of scientific literature in 2020. There was little or no data on the final analytical composition of products, key toxicology data, nutrition profiles, product stability, allergy risk, and any recorded adverse effects when consumed by animals or humans … The FSA report found there are several stages of development for producing cultured meat and at each one, different chemicals, biologics, media formulations, additives, and supplements are used. The contamination risk of each input needs to be assessed, as any undesirable components that remain in the final product need to be at an acceptable exposure level or be food-grade and safe."
Potential problem areas identified by the FSA (see links above) include:
Contaminated reagents, air or water baths
Poorly cleaned or maintained equipment
Failing to follow cleaning protocols when culturing cells
Failing to follow good laboratory practices (GLP) and/or good manufacturing practices (GMP)
Use of antibiotics, fungicides and/or chemicals that are toxic to humans in the production
Consumption of viruses used in the manufacturing process
Cross-contamination of one cell line into another due to concomitant use of multiple cell lines
Other cross-contamination risks, such as "poor maintenance of equipment, poor cleaning regimes, incorrect storage of cells, working with multiple cell lines in one area, using the wrong cells and incorrect labeling"
New diseases and/or allergic reactions to new proteins due to using cell lines of animals not common in the local diet
Nutritional deficiencies, "as the nutrition profile could be different from what it is replacing"
As noted in the report:
“There are many stages of development for producing cultured meat … from taking a cell line from a small vial or biopsy and increasing the culture volume stepwise in stages (proliferation), until a commercial sized bioreactor can be seeded, to differentiating the cells to final desired cell type. Then [they are] maturing them, usually on a scaffold, to increase the protein content, and then detaching/grinding the cells with/from their scaffold to produce a final product that can be used to make meat like cells. At each stage, different chemicals, biologics, media formulations, additives and supplements are used to ensure a successful culture.”Contamination can occur at any of these steps. Each additive also poses potential risks, both known and unknown, as various byproducts are created in the process. In the video above, I review some of the many potential dangers associated with fake meats. Considering the multistep processing cultivated meats undergo, it's simply not possible for it to be as safe as conventional meat, where the primary contamination risks are limited to slaughter, processing, packaging, distribution and storage. With fake meats, hazardous contamination can occur at any point during manufacturing, in addition to these conventional "weak points."
Synthetic meat, is a separate issue, but just for the record, it is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won't have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods. Obesity, Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and depression are but a few examples of conditions known to be promoted and exacerbated by a processed food diet. Ultraprocessed foods already account for up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions. So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions? Synthetic foods will likely be an even bigger driver or chronic ill health and early death. Ultraprocessed foods are also completely counterproductive to environmentally "green" and sustainable goals. For example, ultraprocessed foods already account for 17% to 39% of total diet-related energy use, 36% to 45% of total diet-related biodiversity loss and up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions.22 So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions? As noted in a September 2022 Journal of Cleaner Production paper: "Ultraprocessed foods are fundamentally unsustainable products; they have been associated with poor health and social outcomes and require finite environmental resources for their production … are responsible for significant diet-related energy, [and] greenhouse gas emissions." And, for all the lip service paid to "equity," increasing consumption of processed foods will actually worsen economic inequalities, as it redirects money away from small farmers and independent homesteaders to transnational corporations that rely on underpaid workers.
We already know that The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year, that CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016; The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing; it appears that we already have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows, which we are writing about As noted above in Missouri, lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef.
And New South Wales, the most populous state in Australia, already has cattle herds injected with mRNA. The NSW government’s reason for the animal vaccination drive is to protect them not just from the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) but also from foot and mouth disease (FMD) and lumpy skin disease. As per Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional NSW Paul Toole, this move is an important milestone toward securing the vaccine technology that will protect Australia’s $28.7 billion livestock industry. “The NSW Nationals in Government are taking the threat of FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease extremely seriously, and this milestone is another step forward in preparing for a potential outbreak,” Toole said. He added that he has already written to the vaccine manufacturer to take his challenge to develop vaccines ready for use and manufacture in NSW by August 1 next year. In other words, there’s no science involved in the recent mRNA vaccination drive on cattle herds. Minister for Agriculture Dugald Saunders said U.S. biotechnology company Tiba Biotech has been given free rein to churn out as many mRNA injections as possible to supposedly protect Australia’s multi-billion livestock industry. He said it is critical to developing mRNA vaccines for FMD and lumpy skin as quickly as possible. If they want to do this, fine… but customer informed consent, per the Nuremberg Code is the law.
September 12, 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden signed an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy.” This executive order makes biotechnology a national priority across agencies and branches of government. In late March 2023, Biden expanded on this premise in a “Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing” report. According to this plan, the food industry is now to be led by biotech, and the “improvements” we can look forward to are more lab-grown meats and bioengineered plant foods. Two cell-based lab-grown meat companies have now received the green light to produce and sell fake chicken in the U.S. Per the Biden order: “The Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the heads of appropriate agencies as determined by the Secretary, shall submit a report assessing how to use biotechnology and biomanufacturing for food and agriculture innovation, including by improving sustainability and land conservation; increasing food quality and nutrition; increasing and protecting agricultural yields; protecting against plant and animal pests and diseases; and cultivating alternative food sources.” So, clearly my concern about meat as above is not some "tin foil hat" concern! It is right there in White House releases.
A number of your customers are concerned about mRNA vaccines being put into the meat we consume from your store. We spend many thousands of dollars per year in your store, and do not wish to have these vaccines, or mRNA agents, in either our meat, or our vegetables, without our legal, informed consent, which is the law – laws dating back to the Nuremberg trials, including the subsequent lesser known “Doctors’ Trials” in 1946, Nuremberg, Germany.
If you read nothing else, my request is simple: Can you legally verify that no mRNA-based vaccines or agents are in the meat or fish you sell? In turn, this will be disseminated to a wide range of readers I have.
I understand that you may well consider this to be “tin foil hat” type of concerns. To that end, I am citing studies from universities like UCLA, statements from President Biden, and more, illustrating that this issue is a valid, scientific concern. The information will be quite lengthy, with the sole purpose of proving that this is anything but “fake news.” You need not read all of this, but is there for reference. Lawyers such as Tom Renz also feel unwitting vaccinated meat being pushed onto customers without their consent or knowledge is a valid concern. See his tweet on the subject here, or his substack here. Here’s the point: the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association is 100% opposed to #Missouri #HB1169, which bars mRNA vaccines in meat. If they aren’t putting gene altering drugs in the cows why do they oppose the bill? The fact is that they probably are and want to do more. And vaccines in our veggies “fake news?” Turns out that, for example, Univ. of California Riverside scientists, collaboration with UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon Univ are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories, per SciTech Daily here; similarly in News-Medical Life Sciences, in an article from two years ago, Researchers aim to develop edible plant-based mRNA vaccines, here, we are also told that plant based vaccines are in development. See also Edible vaccines by William HR Langridge at UCLA Note that we are not claiming Bill Gates has tweeted anything about vaccines in our food. Similarly, Dr. Peter McCullough, who is the most heavily published cardiologist in history in his cardiology field, published Data on miRNA Transfer from Food into Human Body are Inconclusive. One study he cites said “Mar-Aguilar et al, reviewed the literature on experiments that attempted to get miRNA into food, ingested, and be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into mammals. In short, the studies were conflicting largely because miRNA was difficult to measure in vivo at the time the studies were performed. As you can see selected studies from the evidence table are not conclusive, however, some were able to show absorption.” But here is the thing: what if it ends up that absorption is taking place, and it is damaging? Some may want to take that risk, but I do not – and certainly not without my legal right of informed consent.
And is this following substack true? American Farmers To Begin Injecting Livestock With mRNA Shots This Month I simply don’t know, and am asking for clarification on this. Certainly, even NPR has reported on the possibility, such as here: Researchers Look To Cattle For Treatment For COVID-19 - NPR. The famed feminist icon Dr. Naomi Wolf discussed with attorney Tom Renz here. Is it “conspiracy theory” to take with sincerity something lawyers, PhDs and even the Missouri congress thinks is an issue?
The “ask” here is simply what the Missouri congress has in its bill:
That there is labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.
That if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘Hey, how does this spread? Does it shed? Is it spread through contact – through sexual contact? Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”
That we have legal, informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … that we have informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.
Again, the ask here is single-fold and straight-forward: are mRNA vaccines being used in meat being sold at your store, and if so, is it labelled? If they are, why won’t anyone tell us? And even further, if these vaxes in meat injure people – as the Covid shot has, which we know from the official VAERS reports at the Dept of Health and Human Services, see here https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html (people can debate exact number all they want; the fact is that the number is clearly greater than one! For example see peer reviewed journal Frontiers in Pharmacology’s article Profiling COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events by Statistical and Ontological Analysis of VAERS Case Reports) you are then in violation my Constitutional rights as well as my right to informed consent, which was established at Nuremberg. Isn’t it "my body, my choice?" The request is not that you stop selling meat that has been given mRNA or similar shots, but rather simply the labelling and disclosure of any gene therapy done to it (Moderna specifically calls this “gene therapy” in their documents); also, that you disclose how the contents of the gene therapy put into meat or vegetables or products you sell can spread to another (shedding? Spread through contact? If so, what kind?) and that we have informed consent (i.e., adverse events of special interest) if there is something like this added.
Here are links you can view – e.g., from the White House, from the Journal of American Medicine, the FDA, the British Medical Journal etc., to verify that these concerns about meat are not something “nutty”: White House Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology September 12, 2022; Bold Goals for US Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing March 2023; Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023; Food Dive March 23, 2023; Food Dive November 16, 2022; FDA Memo November 14, 2022; 9 Food Dive March 21, 2023; Food standards Agency Hazards Identification Report November 2022; Food Safety News March 24, 2023; Food standards Agency Hazards Identification Report November 2022, Page 8; Friends of the Earth, From Lab to Fork, June 2018 (PDF); Cell Metabolism, 2019; doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008; JAMA Internal Medicine February 11, 2019;179(4):490-498; BMJ February 14, 2018; 360; JAMA 2017;317(9):912-924; BMJ, 2019;365:I1451; BMJ, 2019;365:l1949; Journal of Cleaner Production September 25, 2022; 368: 133155; HR 2657 PRIME Act
As noted above, vaccines being in our meat is certainly of concern enough for the state of Missouri tendered Missouri House Bill No. 1169, the Informed Consent Bill, which you can read here.
The issue of vaccines in our meat, milk and even vegetables – without our informed consent, is a LEGAL issue for us. Fake news? Hardly. Dr. Peter McCullough, who just happens to be the most heavily published doctor in history in his area of cardiology, tweeted April 7, 2023 at https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1644358357346549761?t=JH1xrq2P4noczTmjK61Y9w&s=19 that the “Chinese successfully loaded cow's milk with mRNA and it was absorbed in the GI tract of recipients.” If people choose this, that is their choice. But for the rest of us, we do NOT tender our consent for this, and certainly not uninformed consent. Relative to this, the Nuremberg Code, which is a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation created by the court in U.S. v Brandt (Dr. Karl Brandt was one of Hitler’s lead doctors) says that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior orm of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.” You can read the code at the National Institute of Health website here: https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg%2BCode
I am watching my triple Pfizer vaxed 70 year old husband go through hell for two years. He thinks it's "aging". This week it's heart surgery for clots. My unvaxed heart is breaking.
I have a paper that is now - literally - over 2,000 pages, 10k of footnotes, which I have spent thousands of hours on. I kindly let my rich little brother know, indicating the amount of research, and who has gotten the shot. Rather than say "Gee, what did you learn?" rather, he just wrote "Quit emailing me." OK, so I did. Last I checked his fully vaxed wife was on her second round of severe Covid. Another woman, after I told her about the aborted fetal material tested with (2) or used (2), including some material which came from Univ. of Pittsburgh Medical Center where I have consulted - and I have screen dumps from internal whistle blowers to prove my point - simply said "I know, but I got the shot cuz I just want to go to Cancun next month." Right. Sounds like a 3 year old in those experiments where if they wait 10 minutes, they will get a second marshmallow. Another person who is pro-life just looked at me stupidly; then when I talked about immune erosion, said "Well, I got the shot 4 months ago and I'm fine." Right. Exactly what heroin and meth users say: "I've been shooting up for a half year and look, I"m fine!" Yeah, give it another 6 months, Einstein. Another has a psychologist daughter, but who is consumed by fear, and was told she couldn't see her grand daughter unless she got the shot. Fact is, Dr. Martin Makary looked at the insurance records fo 48 freaking THOUSAND under 21 kids, and unless they had cancer of similar, a grand total of ZERO died of Covid. A study by Ludvigsson in Sweden found freaking ZERO deaths in the under 21 cohort, and Dr. Jay Bhattaharya, PhD and MD, Stanford Medical SChool - whom you might just think knows a thing or two - said in Imprimus, Oct. 2020 that under 21 kids have 2 - 3 time the risk of dying from regular seasonal flu than they due from Covid. https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Imprimis_October_10-20_6pgNM.pdf
Another guy in church, when he marched up to me and demanded to know if I got the shot, when I replied about my lengthy paper - which cites, eg., Bhattcharya at Stanford Medical School, Makary at Johns Hopkins, Martin Kuldorff at Harvard Medical School, Harvey Risch at Yale Medical School, Lancet, BMJ, the freaking CDC itself which said Jan. 19, 2022 that if you have had Covid, your immunity is equal or superior to that of the shot - read it yourself here https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm#contribAff ... etc etc etc etc. ... anyhow, you might think he would ask, as I sure would "Gee, what did you learn?"
Nope. Just turned on his heel and stomped off.
The cult of Covid is worse than Jonestown. I would feel more sympathy, but most of these people are morally and/or intellectually lazy, and they have now destroyed their immune systems.
I have done everything I can to help people, some of which is on my substack Att Viska. But basically, most people are comfortable and in normalcy bias. Which will end up killing or maiming them. And, to be honest, a lot of this is simple LAZINESS, morally and/or intellectually, and a giant sense of entitlement.
Do most of the supplicants know they are killing people or is it that they don't want to know? I say they are part of a cult and they don't want to know. The vaccine is a sacred sacrament in their new religion!
Why were the Following So-Called Special and Elite Groups of People Were Exempted From Receiving The Cytotoxic, Genotoxic and Magnetic Toxic Graphene Oxide, PEGulated Hydrosol, mRNA Directed Bioweapon with Trypanosoma Parasite Eggs are listed below:
Group One Exempted:
All of the USA Congress plus all the Congressional Staff of the House & Senate and their families!!!!
Group Two Exempted:
The US President, Vice President, Cabinet and their families and the entire 26,000 Whitehouse Employees and their families!!!!
Group Three Exempted:
All officers and directors of Pfizer including 2500 Key Employees around the World and their families!!!!
Group Four Exempted:
All officers and directors of Moderna including 1,500 Key Moderna Employees and their families!!!!
Group Five Exempted:
All officers and directors of Johnson & Johnson including120,000 Employees and their families!!!!!
Group Six Exempted:
All key CDC officers and directors including15,000 Employees and their families!!!!!
Group Seven Exempted:
All officers and directors of the FDA and 14,000 FDA Employees and their families!!!!!
Group Eight Exempted:
Over 8 Million Chinese Students studying abroad!!!!
Group Nine Exempted:
Millions of Illegal invaders crossing over our borders into the USA!!!!
Group Ten Exempted:
Millions of Homeless & Tent Street People in the USA!!!!
This is on my substack at Att Viska
Part III
5. As reported by Food Dive:
"While advocates and some companies have been working to reduce methane emissions from food, cut down on food waste, increase capacity for producing alternative proteins and use bioengineering to make healthier and hardier crops and animals, goals like these have never before come from the White House …The federal government is providing more evidence that it intends to do more than just talk about big goals. A day before the report came out, FDA gave its second tacit approval to a company using biotechnology to grow meat from cells in bioreactors. While neither … is creating meat for consumers yet, this action shows that the federal government is moving toward making cultivated meat a reality."
Among the many problems with this plan is the fact that taxpayers will now be paying for government's funding of private corporations involved in the fake food industry. The end result is predictable. What we'll have is a repeat of what happened with farm subsidies. Rather than subsidizing the most nutritious foods, government farm subsidies go almost exclusively to large monoculture farms growing genetically engineered corn, soy and other basic ingredients used in processed foods. As a result, the processed food industry has grown on our dime while public health has deteriorated. The same thing could well happen here. Instead of investing in regenerative agriculture, which is what could really solve our problems, government is backing a whole new industry of fake foods, from lab-grown meats to large-scale insect production. At present, two cell-based lab-grown meat companies have received the green light to produce and sell fake chicken in the U.S. The first, Upside Foods (previously Memphis Meats), received FDA approval for its cell-based lab-grown chicken in November 2022. According to the FDA's November 14, 2022, memo: “We have no questions at this time about UPSIDE's conclusion that foods comprised of or containing cultured chicken cell material resulting from the production process … are as safe as comparable foods produced by other methods.”Dr. Uma Valeti, CEO and founder of Upside Foods, called the approval "a watershed moment in the history of food" and a "major step toward a new era in meat production." The company has a 53,000-square-foot facility in the San Francisco Bay Area capable of producing 400,000 pounds of fake meat per year. In March 2023, Eat Just — which has been selling its lab-grown chicken in Singapore since 2020 — also received FDA approval. The company is currently building a commercial-scale facility in the U.S. that will house 10 250,000-liter bioreactors.The problem with us consumers? Safety data is sorely lacking. While the U.S. government is moving full speed ahead with approvals for lab-grown meats, a Food Hazards Identification report by the British Food standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland, published in March 2023, warns there are "considerable gaps in knowledge" when it comes to cell-based meat production. As reported by Food Safety News March 24, 2023: "The purpose of the report was to identify hazards in the cultivated meat production process to help inform the FSA risk assessment process for authorization. It was also important that products do not pose any microbiological or chemical concerns. The research was based on a review of scientific literature in 2020. There was little or no data on the final analytical composition of products, key toxicology data, nutrition profiles, product stability, allergy risk, and any recorded adverse effects when consumed by animals or humans … The FSA report found there are several stages of development for producing cultured meat and at each one, different chemicals, biologics, media formulations, additives, and supplements are used. The contamination risk of each input needs to be assessed, as any undesirable components that remain in the final product need to be at an acceptable exposure level or be food-grade and safe."
Potential problem areas identified by the FSA (see links above) include:
Contaminated reagents, air or water baths
Poorly cleaned or maintained equipment
Failing to follow cleaning protocols when culturing cells
Failing to follow good laboratory practices (GLP) and/or good manufacturing practices (GMP)
Use of antibiotics, fungicides and/or chemicals that are toxic to humans in the production
Consumption of viruses used in the manufacturing process
Cross-contamination of one cell line into another due to concomitant use of multiple cell lines
Other cross-contamination risks, such as "poor maintenance of equipment, poor cleaning regimes, incorrect storage of cells, working with multiple cell lines in one area, using the wrong cells and incorrect labeling"
New diseases and/or allergic reactions to new proteins due to using cell lines of animals not common in the local diet
Nutritional deficiencies, "as the nutrition profile could be different from what it is replacing"
As noted in the report:
“There are many stages of development for producing cultured meat … from taking a cell line from a small vial or biopsy and increasing the culture volume stepwise in stages (proliferation), until a commercial sized bioreactor can be seeded, to differentiating the cells to final desired cell type. Then [they are] maturing them, usually on a scaffold, to increase the protein content, and then detaching/grinding the cells with/from their scaffold to produce a final product that can be used to make meat like cells. At each stage, different chemicals, biologics, media formulations, additives and supplements are used to ensure a successful culture.”Contamination can occur at any of these steps. Each additive also poses potential risks, both known and unknown, as various byproducts are created in the process. In the video above, I review some of the many potential dangers associated with fake meats. Considering the multistep processing cultivated meats undergo, it's simply not possible for it to be as safe as conventional meat, where the primary contamination risks are limited to slaughter, processing, packaging, distribution and storage. With fake meats, hazardous contamination can occur at any point during manufacturing, in addition to these conventional "weak points."
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD has noted she has found structures looking like mRNA based vaccines in grocery store meat, at here on her substack at https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/interview-with-maria-zeee-major-chain or as reported by Maria Zee here https://zeeemedia.com/interview/dr-ana-mihalcea-major-chain-grocery-meat-full-of-structures-like-vaxx-australia-u-s/ Is she right? As a customer and consumer, I just would like an answer.
Synthetic meat, is a separate issue, but just for the record, it is the epitome of ultraprocessed food, and it seems naïve to think it won't have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods. Obesity, Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and depression are but a few examples of conditions known to be promoted and exacerbated by a processed food diet. Ultraprocessed foods already account for up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions. So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions? Synthetic foods will likely be an even bigger driver or chronic ill health and early death. Ultraprocessed foods are also completely counterproductive to environmentally "green" and sustainable goals. For example, ultraprocessed foods already account for 17% to 39% of total diet-related energy use, 36% to 45% of total diet-related biodiversity loss and up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions.22 So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions? As noted in a September 2022 Journal of Cleaner Production paper: "Ultraprocessed foods are fundamentally unsustainable products; they have been associated with poor health and social outcomes and require finite environmental resources for their production … are responsible for significant diet-related energy, [and] greenhouse gas emissions." And, for all the lip service paid to "equity," increasing consumption of processed foods will actually worsen economic inequalities, as it redirects money away from small farmers and independent homesteaders to transnational corporations that rely on underpaid workers.
Please advise,
Part II
We already know that The very first RNA-based livestock vaccine, a swine influenza (H3N2) RNA shot licensed in 2012, was developed by Harrisvaccines. The company followed up with an avian influenza mRNA shot in 2015. Harrisvaccines was acquired by Merck Animal Health later that year, that CureVac developed an mRNA-based rabies shot for pigs in 2016; The swine vaccine platform Sequivity, introduced in 2018, was developed by Merck in partnership with Moderna. Sequivity can produce endlessly customized “vaccines,” none of which undergo safety testing; it appears that we already have been eating pork treated with gene therapy for nearly five years already, and even more of our meat supply is about to get the same treatment. mRNA-lipid nanoparticle shots for avian influenza are in the works, as are mRNA shots for cows, which we are writing about As noted above in Missouri, lobbyists for the Cattlemen’s Association recently confirmed they intend to use mRNA “vaccines” in cattle, which might affect both dairy and beef.
And New South Wales, the most populous state in Australia, already has cattle herds injected with mRNA. The NSW government’s reason for the animal vaccination drive is to protect them not just from the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) but also from foot and mouth disease (FMD) and lumpy skin disease. As per Deputy Premier and Minister for Regional NSW Paul Toole, this move is an important milestone toward securing the vaccine technology that will protect Australia’s $28.7 billion livestock industry. “The NSW Nationals in Government are taking the threat of FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease extremely seriously, and this milestone is another step forward in preparing for a potential outbreak,” Toole said. He added that he has already written to the vaccine manufacturer to take his challenge to develop vaccines ready for use and manufacture in NSW by August 1 next year. In other words, there’s no science involved in the recent mRNA vaccination drive on cattle herds. Minister for Agriculture Dugald Saunders said U.S. biotechnology company Tiba Biotech has been given free rein to churn out as many mRNA injections as possible to supposedly protect Australia’s multi-billion livestock industry. He said it is critical to developing mRNA vaccines for FMD and lumpy skin as quickly as possible. If they want to do this, fine… but customer informed consent, per the Nuremberg Code is the law.
September 12, 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden signed an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy.” This executive order makes biotechnology a national priority across agencies and branches of government. In late March 2023, Biden expanded on this premise in a “Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing” report. According to this plan, the food industry is now to be led by biotech, and the “improvements” we can look forward to are more lab-grown meats and bioengineered plant foods. Two cell-based lab-grown meat companies have now received the green light to produce and sell fake chicken in the U.S. Per the Biden order: “The Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the heads of appropriate agencies as determined by the Secretary, shall submit a report assessing how to use biotechnology and biomanufacturing for food and agriculture innovation, including by improving sustainability and land conservation; increasing food quality and nutrition; increasing and protecting agricultural yields; protecting against plant and animal pests and diseases; and cultivating alternative food sources.” So, clearly my concern about meat as above is not some "tin foil hat" concern! It is right there in White House releases.
I hope some of you can "steal" the verbiage below for your own letters to your grocers:
Whole Foods Headquarters
550 Bowie St. Austin, TX 78703
Attn.: Sam Ferguson, VP, Mark Ehrnstein, VP
customer.questions@wholefoods.com
A number of your customers are concerned about mRNA vaccines being put into the meat we consume from your store. We spend many thousands of dollars per year in your store, and do not wish to have these vaccines, or mRNA agents, in either our meat, or our vegetables, without our legal, informed consent, which is the law – laws dating back to the Nuremberg trials, including the subsequent lesser known “Doctors’ Trials” in 1946, Nuremberg, Germany.
If you read nothing else, my request is simple: Can you legally verify that no mRNA-based vaccines or agents are in the meat or fish you sell? In turn, this will be disseminated to a wide range of readers I have.
I understand that you may well consider this to be “tin foil hat” type of concerns. To that end, I am citing studies from universities like UCLA, statements from President Biden, and more, illustrating that this issue is a valid, scientific concern. The information will be quite lengthy, with the sole purpose of proving that this is anything but “fake news.” You need not read all of this, but is there for reference. Lawyers such as Tom Renz also feel unwitting vaccinated meat being pushed onto customers without their consent or knowledge is a valid concern. See his tweet on the subject here, or his substack here. Here’s the point: the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association is 100% opposed to #Missouri #HB1169, which bars mRNA vaccines in meat. If they aren’t putting gene altering drugs in the cows why do they oppose the bill? The fact is that they probably are and want to do more. And vaccines in our veggies “fake news?” Turns out that, for example, Univ. of California Riverside scientists, collaboration with UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon Univ are studying whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories, per SciTech Daily here; similarly in News-Medical Life Sciences, in an article from two years ago, Researchers aim to develop edible plant-based mRNA vaccines, here, we are also told that plant based vaccines are in development. See also Edible vaccines by William HR Langridge at UCLA Note that we are not claiming Bill Gates has tweeted anything about vaccines in our food. Similarly, Dr. Peter McCullough, who is the most heavily published cardiologist in history in his cardiology field, published Data on miRNA Transfer from Food into Human Body are Inconclusive. One study he cites said “Mar-Aguilar et al, reviewed the literature on experiments that attempted to get miRNA into food, ingested, and be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract into mammals. In short, the studies were conflicting largely because miRNA was difficult to measure in vivo at the time the studies were performed. As you can see selected studies from the evidence table are not conclusive, however, some were able to show absorption.” But here is the thing: what if it ends up that absorption is taking place, and it is damaging? Some may want to take that risk, but I do not – and certainly not without my legal right of informed consent.
And is this following substack true? American Farmers To Begin Injecting Livestock With mRNA Shots This Month I simply don’t know, and am asking for clarification on this. Certainly, even NPR has reported on the possibility, such as here: Researchers Look To Cattle For Treatment For COVID-19 - NPR. The famed feminist icon Dr. Naomi Wolf discussed with attorney Tom Renz here. Is it “conspiracy theory” to take with sincerity something lawyers, PhDs and even the Missouri congress thinks is an issue?
The “ask” here is simply what the Missouri congress has in its bill:
That there is labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.
That if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘Hey, how does this spread? Does it shed? Is it spread through contact – through sexual contact? Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”
That we have legal, informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … that we have informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.
Again, the ask here is single-fold and straight-forward: are mRNA vaccines being used in meat being sold at your store, and if so, is it labelled? If they are, why won’t anyone tell us? And even further, if these vaxes in meat injure people – as the Covid shot has, which we know from the official VAERS reports at the Dept of Health and Human Services, see here https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html (people can debate exact number all they want; the fact is that the number is clearly greater than one! For example see peer reviewed journal Frontiers in Pharmacology’s article Profiling COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events by Statistical and Ontological Analysis of VAERS Case Reports) you are then in violation my Constitutional rights as well as my right to informed consent, which was established at Nuremberg. Isn’t it "my body, my choice?" The request is not that you stop selling meat that has been given mRNA or similar shots, but rather simply the labelling and disclosure of any gene therapy done to it (Moderna specifically calls this “gene therapy” in their documents); also, that you disclose how the contents of the gene therapy put into meat or vegetables or products you sell can spread to another (shedding? Spread through contact? If so, what kind?) and that we have informed consent (i.e., adverse events of special interest) if there is something like this added.
Here are links you can view – e.g., from the White House, from the Journal of American Medicine, the FDA, the British Medical Journal etc., to verify that these concerns about meat are not something “nutty”: White House Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology September 12, 2022; Bold Goals for US Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing March 2023; Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023; Food Dive March 23, 2023; Food Dive November 16, 2022; FDA Memo November 14, 2022; 9 Food Dive March 21, 2023; Food standards Agency Hazards Identification Report November 2022; Food Safety News March 24, 2023; Food standards Agency Hazards Identification Report November 2022, Page 8; Friends of the Earth, From Lab to Fork, June 2018 (PDF); Cell Metabolism, 2019; doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008; JAMA Internal Medicine February 11, 2019;179(4):490-498; BMJ February 14, 2018; 360; JAMA 2017;317(9):912-924; BMJ, 2019;365:I1451; BMJ, 2019;365:l1949; Journal of Cleaner Production September 25, 2022; 368: 133155; HR 2657 PRIME Act
As noted above, vaccines being in our meat is certainly of concern enough for the state of Missouri tendered Missouri House Bill No. 1169, the Informed Consent Bill, which you can read here.
The issue of vaccines in our meat, milk and even vegetables – without our informed consent, is a LEGAL issue for us. Fake news? Hardly. Dr. Peter McCullough, who just happens to be the most heavily published doctor in history in his area of cardiology, tweeted April 7, 2023 at https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1644358357346549761?t=JH1xrq2P4noczTmjK61Y9w&s=19 that the “Chinese successfully loaded cow's milk with mRNA and it was absorbed in the GI tract of recipients.” If people choose this, that is their choice. But for the rest of us, we do NOT tender our consent for this, and certainly not uninformed consent. Relative to this, the Nuremberg Code, which is a set of ethical research principles for human experimentation created by the court in U.S. v Brandt (Dr. Karl Brandt was one of Hitler’s lead doctors) says that “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior orm of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.” You can read the code at the National Institute of Health website here: https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg%2BCode
Our only hope is to rely on God-given solutions like the Sun, and the nanotech of our skin:
https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/can-we-detox-nanotech-with-sunlight
Kingston must have been reading my Substack. :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-final-solution
But not long enough:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/this-is-how-it-will-go-down
The data for England and Wales shows no evidence of a genocide let alone an extinction in 2021 nor 2022 https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/deaths-england-and-wales-2020-2022
Jo
I am watching my triple Pfizer vaxed 70 year old husband go through hell for two years. He thinks it's "aging". This week it's heart surgery for clots. My unvaxed heart is breaking.
I have a paper that is now - literally - over 2,000 pages, 10k of footnotes, which I have spent thousands of hours on. I kindly let my rich little brother know, indicating the amount of research, and who has gotten the shot. Rather than say "Gee, what did you learn?" rather, he just wrote "Quit emailing me." OK, so I did. Last I checked his fully vaxed wife was on her second round of severe Covid. Another woman, after I told her about the aborted fetal material tested with (2) or used (2), including some material which came from Univ. of Pittsburgh Medical Center where I have consulted - and I have screen dumps from internal whistle blowers to prove my point - simply said "I know, but I got the shot cuz I just want to go to Cancun next month." Right. Sounds like a 3 year old in those experiments where if they wait 10 minutes, they will get a second marshmallow. Another person who is pro-life just looked at me stupidly; then when I talked about immune erosion, said "Well, I got the shot 4 months ago and I'm fine." Right. Exactly what heroin and meth users say: "I've been shooting up for a half year and look, I"m fine!" Yeah, give it another 6 months, Einstein. Another has a psychologist daughter, but who is consumed by fear, and was told she couldn't see her grand daughter unless she got the shot. Fact is, Dr. Martin Makary looked at the insurance records fo 48 freaking THOUSAND under 21 kids, and unless they had cancer of similar, a grand total of ZERO died of Covid. A study by Ludvigsson in Sweden found freaking ZERO deaths in the under 21 cohort, and Dr. Jay Bhattaharya, PhD and MD, Stanford Medical SChool - whom you might just think knows a thing or two - said in Imprimus, Oct. 2020 that under 21 kids have 2 - 3 time the risk of dying from regular seasonal flu than they due from Covid. https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Imprimis_October_10-20_6pgNM.pdf
Another guy in church, when he marched up to me and demanded to know if I got the shot, when I replied about my lengthy paper - which cites, eg., Bhattcharya at Stanford Medical School, Makary at Johns Hopkins, Martin Kuldorff at Harvard Medical School, Harvey Risch at Yale Medical School, Lancet, BMJ, the freaking CDC itself which said Jan. 19, 2022 that if you have had Covid, your immunity is equal or superior to that of the shot - read it yourself here https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm#contribAff ... etc etc etc etc. ... anyhow, you might think he would ask, as I sure would "Gee, what did you learn?"
Nope. Just turned on his heel and stomped off.
The cult of Covid is worse than Jonestown. I would feel more sympathy, but most of these people are morally and/or intellectually lazy, and they have now destroyed their immune systems.
I have done everything I can to help people, some of which is on my substack Att Viska. But basically, most people are comfortable and in normalcy bias. Which will end up killing or maiming them. And, to be honest, a lot of this is simple LAZINESS, morally and/or intellectually, and a giant sense of entitlement.
Do most of the supplicants know they are killing people or is it that they don't want to know? I say they are part of a cult and they don't want to know. The vaccine is a sacred sacrament in their new religion!
My Mystery Cult. The Covidian cult explained in song. Watch the music video: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/my-mystery-cult
There's a new church in town. Watch CHURCH OF THE PANDEMIC MIND. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/church-of-the-pandemic-mind
DR. GASLIGHT. A doctor causes his patient to question her own sanity. Listen to Turfseer’s new song. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/dr-gaslight
Jonestown meets the Covidian cult. Listen to Turfseer’s hit song I DRANK THE KOOL-AID.. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/i-drank-the-kool-aid
“Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and his “patient” Buster Keaton join forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch the hit music video TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
Thank you, as always Lioness!
They are very open about what the plans are here. Here's the belly of one Silicon Valley beast :
https://www.synbiobeta.com/
https://www.synbiobeta.com/read-biology
I don't doubt the dangers of the vax, but this article looks like garbage to me.
https://open.substack.com/pub/lawyerlisa/p/incendiary-and-temperature-effects?utm_source=direct&r=3kbp6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
British doctor encounter with a patient who is excluded from wearing a mask.
1 hour 15 secs. Filmed on April 17th of this year according the patient. Masks are no longer required in the UK but.... then we have this.
https://twitter.com/davidglen38/status/1652009229278953477?s=20
Quarters are not magnetic.
This was a simple fact-check. Get a magnet. Get a quarter.