No one really knows what's in these shots. The disinformation is all over the place on this subject, well funded and backed up with "studies". Anyone who claims they know anything better have their OWN research to back up what they say. I'm to the point I don't trust anything I haven't seen myself. All you need to know is to not willingly be intentionally poisoned. We can all agree on that.
Besides modRNA, the pegylated lipid nanoparticles themselves and the included toxic reduced graphene oxide also create a 'biological corona' aka 'protein corona' aka spike proteins on the surface of cells they come in contact.ts t with.
What will happen when you mix two of these (mod) mRNA vaccines - they intend to find out this fall with willing participants over 60 who are willing to get a RSV vax and covid booster.
This is a good summary. I've been using modRNA or "mRNA" (with the quotes) all along, because the disclosed active ingredient in the shots is NOT mRNA. I don't have the knowledge to write about it in any depth, but I can say that this article is thorough.
Of course now we are learning that the shots also contain variable amounts of manufacturing byproducts including plasmid DNA that has the potential to incorporate into somatic DNA if it finds itself in the right place at the right time, when a cell is dividing.
The problems with mass manufacturing were well known and unsolved when the shots were rolled out, and are still unsolved. No problem, though. Just have public health and the media repeat "safe and effective" over and over again and people will believe it, some to their dying day. This is a problem with the people, not just with the "authorities".
I imagine that plasmid DNA could more likely incorporate into our microbiome symbionts than our own DNA. Our symbionts could then produce antibiotic resistance encoded on plasmids for laboratory selection and produce proteins using encoding regions contained on plasmid.
Yes, makes a whole lot of sense given that bacterial game of ring toss.. That's why I don't write much about it. Too many details to keep track of! Thank you.
Propaganda? Do you know anything about critically processing information? I agree there are NO viruses. This article contains important info on the jabs, people need to know. When it comes to the Germ theory fraud, people need top research and make their own conclusion. Unfortunately the vast majority of the freedom movement doctors still believe in Germ theory. Does it mean we should not publish articles containing important information? People need to learn how to critically process ANY information presented.
Forgive my naivete Doc, but why is this not a virus please. Or put another way, how is this different from a virus? Thank you for helping me understand this assault on humanity better.
Great summary of the ingredients that constituted crimes against humanity. Fauci et al (Bourla, Tedros, Gates, Whitehouse Drs spewing "Safe and effective" narratives, UNC Drs, etc, should all face Nuremberg like trials, and when found guilty of premeditated and deliberate murder, mayhem, torture and being a Bioterrorist, should "swing"
Aug 2, 2023·edited Aug 2, 2023Liked by Lioness of Judah Ministry
Maybe I misunderstood your post, but you seem to imply that 'viruses' are a thing, and they do 'stuff'. Newsflash, they don't do anything..
From your post above:
"When RNA from an external source enters our cells (such as viral RNA), these cells can synthesize viral proteins."
IMHO, the way something can mess with someone cells, is using synthetic mechanisms (such as injecting poisons or mRNA shit, into your bloodstream). Nothing natural, and certainly, not airborne. So mentioning 'viral RNA', implies a natural virus (which does not exist).
Again, maybe I misunderstood your words, if that's the case, I must apologise.
I think the article should be a bit clearer, to make a distinction between 'viral RNA' and synthetic RNA, delivered in various ways. In my mind, 'viral RNA' implies a natural 'virus', which is not something that I think it exists in real life.
My husband was not stupid or weak and he took it. And who is to say is weak and unfit for procreation? Nazis used that term and they based it of Darwin.
Sure he was "onto something"... he was a Freemason ( just like the authors of the Germ theory) and was into deceiving the world into a one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated on humanity
I shouldn’t have responded to you. You didn’t know him.
Thank you for clarifying this!!
No one really knows what's in these shots. The disinformation is all over the place on this subject, well funded and backed up with "studies". Anyone who claims they know anything better have their OWN research to back up what they say. I'm to the point I don't trust anything I haven't seen myself. All you need to know is to not willingly be intentionally poisoned. We can all agree on that.
Besides modRNA, the pegylated lipid nanoparticles themselves and the included toxic reduced graphene oxide also create a 'biological corona' aka 'protein corona' aka spike proteins on the surface of cells they come in contact.ts t with.
Why is this being ignored?
What will happen when you mix two of these (mod) mRNA vaccines - they intend to find out this fall with willing participants over 60 who are willing to get a RSV vax and covid booster.
This is a good summary. I've been using modRNA or "mRNA" (with the quotes) all along, because the disclosed active ingredient in the shots is NOT mRNA. I don't have the knowledge to write about it in any depth, but I can say that this article is thorough.
Of course now we are learning that the shots also contain variable amounts of manufacturing byproducts including plasmid DNA that has the potential to incorporate into somatic DNA if it finds itself in the right place at the right time, when a cell is dividing.
The problems with mass manufacturing were well known and unsolved when the shots were rolled out, and are still unsolved. No problem, though. Just have public health and the media repeat "safe and effective" over and over again and people will believe it, some to their dying day. This is a problem with the people, not just with the "authorities".
I imagine that plasmid DNA could more likely incorporate into our microbiome symbionts than our own DNA. Our symbionts could then produce antibiotic resistance encoded on plasmids for laboratory selection and produce proteins using encoding regions contained on plasmid.
Yes, makes a whole lot of sense given that bacterial game of ring toss.. That's why I don't write much about it. Too many details to keep track of! Thank you.
There is no 'virus'. Please stop the propaganda, it only serves those in power..
Propaganda? Do you know anything about critically processing information? I agree there are NO viruses. This article contains important info on the jabs, people need to know. When it comes to the Germ theory fraud, people need top research and make their own conclusion. Unfortunately the vast majority of the freedom movement doctors still believe in Germ theory. Does it mean we should not publish articles containing important information? People need to learn how to critically process ANY information presented.
Forgive my naivete Doc, but why is this not a virus please. Or put another way, how is this different from a virus? Thank you for helping me understand this assault on humanity better.
Great summary of the ingredients that constituted crimes against humanity. Fauci et al (Bourla, Tedros, Gates, Whitehouse Drs spewing "Safe and effective" narratives, UNC Drs, etc, should all face Nuremberg like trials, and when found guilty of premeditated and deliberate murder, mayhem, torture and being a Bioterrorist, should "swing"
Maybe I misunderstood your post, but you seem to imply that 'viruses' are a thing, and they do 'stuff'. Newsflash, they don't do anything..
From your post above:
"When RNA from an external source enters our cells (such as viral RNA), these cells can synthesize viral proteins."
IMHO, the way something can mess with someone cells, is using synthetic mechanisms (such as injecting poisons or mRNA shit, into your bloodstream). Nothing natural, and certainly, not airborne. So mentioning 'viral RNA', implies a natural virus (which does not exist).
Again, maybe I misunderstood your words, if that's the case, I must apologise.
This article is a re post from GreatGameIndia
I think the article should be a bit clearer, to make a distinction between 'viral RNA' and synthetic RNA, delivered in various ways. In my mind, 'viral RNA' implies a natural 'virus', which is not something that I think it exists in real life.
But there is the jab, there in is the problem. When fear enters the decision process our fellow man has the horrible results. I am no fan of Darwin.
Darwin was onto something, that's for sure.. No need to be fan of him, but better, to be aware of what he says.
The stupid, the weak, those unfit for procreation, will be taken out of the gene pool. That is a fact. And that's what these injections are doing ..
they're aim is to take us all out
My husband was not stupid or weak and he took it. And who is to say is weak and unfit for procreation? Nazis used that term and they based it of Darwin.
Why did he took it, then?
And that phrase, Darwin and his freemason friends said it, not me..
Sure he was "onto something"... he was a Freemason ( just like the authors of the Germ theory) and was into deceiving the world into a one of the biggest lies ever perpetrated on humanity
I've heard that freemasons are obligated (by whatever belief system) to tell the world what they are about to do.
So they give warnings in subtle ways, that they are about to do this, or that.
The theory of natural selection, might just be one of those warnings..
Yes they always tell us what they are about to do in advance. BTW Freemasonry is a Babylonian Mystery Religion which goes by MANY different names...
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-corona-end-game