What's next? Concentration camps and gas chambers?
Slapinski must have been sarcastically saying this? Was he serious?
Does not sound any better in English than it sounded in Europe in the 1930's and 40's,
Slapinksi. Perhaps one of THE most self-congratulatory yet low IQ people on the planet. And he is no "conservative" any more than Mitch McConnell is.
WOW. Have those ppl shown yet that CV-19 is actually a thing yet, which can be tested for? Because nobody else seems to have (yet): https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/68-health-science-institutions-globally-all-failed-to-cite-even-1-record-of-sars-cov-2-purification-by-anyone-anywhere-ever/
If I lived in your formerly-wonderful country, I'd be relocating ASAP. US of A isn't so great either, but you people are definitely ahead of us in tyranny..
I found that in Ontario, it went from voluntary to many companies putting more pressure on the employees to get the non-vaccine. There was a great deal of bashing of the non-vsccinated. I reluctantly went and got the two initial vaccines in late 2021. I was already gaining some knowledge to present to a doctor. I did not like the answers given. I presented this to my supervisor. It boiled down to get the shot or no job. I am very angry with what happened.
Surely to God, Mark Slapinsky was being sarcastic. How could he possibly NOT be aware of the reality of what he was saying?😱 I've visited Dachau. I've read "The Gulag Archipelago" as far as I could stand it, half-way through Volume II; the horror of what Solzhenitsyn was describing was too much.
And if he WAS serious? Then something like The Nuremberg Tribunals for him. His execution after the inevitable "guilty" verdict, public and televised. I favour the guillotine for these monsters: Impossible to fake, no ambiguity. Leave his head on a pole for a few weeks so we'll know justice was served.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
7 December 1996.
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to
which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in
a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post
World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document
enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The
principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control
his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected
benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended
into general codes of medical ethics.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical
experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds,
conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the
practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such
experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other
methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must
be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved
as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This
latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision
by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature,
duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is
to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected;
and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests
upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is
Now who ever made that statement in the Toronto stars needs to be charged along with the Toronto star for publishing such hate.
science coming straight out of Justin's ass to your tv news station, gotta profit from that 100 million vaccine plant he just opened in Quebec. Unlike the father, the son is a pure dumb fuck.
You were warned.
smoke chaser, thats me
"Nazi Germany was a trial in preparation for the coming Global Genocide. We are currently witnessing its first stage, the worst is yet to come."
I think you are correct about that. I am smok*chaser*19 on twit. I'm gonna cancel some of my other subscriptions, that I pay for, and throw the cash to you. You offer more valuable insight than some of the people I subscribe to.
The Slapinski vid is obviously satire
Every Single Time.
Also-“Fisman also disclosed receiving honorarium for advisory roles from Pfizer, AstraZeneca and the Ontario Nurses' Association, related to COVID-19.“
Good article!!! Will be linking it tomorrow @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/