The call for pharmaceutical supremacy came in Pfizer’s response to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s suit alleging that Pfizer committed fraud and “conspired to censor public discourse.”
Not a single popular uprising won in history. A revolt is probably being provoked in order to introduce national emergency, martial law, and announce gun confiscation. It won't take more than a few months for the US population to be reduced to the projected 50 million...
FWIW, I think the American Revolution might be characterized as a popular uprising that succeeded, at least for a couple hundred years. If you count the current collapse of the country as a popular uprising failure, then it is fair to say that none has succeeded, at least not in the long run.
Yes, it could be, but it didn't do much for the average American that was worth dying for. Those who owned assets, on the other hand, didn't have to pay taxes to the Crown anymore, and were able to use the money saved on investments, which ultimately led to the Civil War, because slavery was not as flexible and lucrative as capitalism and "democracy" for those in power. As long as the territories were growing, the situation remained unstable, but newcomers at least had a chance to receive farmlands (that, of course, many of them lost soon after). That was a major advantage over the "Crown" owning every piece of land.
The growing territories of the US opened up room for scavengers like the Rockefellers, and the power struggles were finalized after the Civil War that won for the globalist bankers. The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which opened up the path for centralization under the Federal Government that soon openly betrayed the people. By the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (and the founding of the IRS, the Fed's lapdog), the country was fully lost.
In a way, Russia 1917 could also be called a "win" for the poor, but it only won, because the reds occupied the food supply at a time, when the choice was between starving to death or joining them...
All true; would that average Americans understood much of this.
I'm not sure the Russian Revolution was a win for the poor; millions starved to death after the revolution when the new government requisitioned every single grain of crops to feed the big cities. Even those who joined the Reds were reduced to abject poverty and starvation, something typical if Socialist governments.
The same thing will happen to today's enablers and enforcers, who seem to be acting under the delusion that they are special. Once they complete their dirty work, they'll be culled just the same.
The American Revolution was won for the upper middle. It was a power switch, when a new ruling class triumphed. Needless to say, it was the same bankers who financed the American Revolution AND the British Crown...
Paxton's approach to this was a problem. These bioweapons were formulated and distributed by the DOD as an EUA countermeasure which sets aside all normal issues of redress. Sasha Latypova has written on this in exquisite detail on her stack.
No liability = no usage. I refuse to use any product that does not consider itself worthy of providing liability protection to the user. It is 1,000% obvious that fizer and moderna both know their mRNA products are extremely dangerous and that is why they refuse to back them up. Both are criminal enterprises operating with a mission statement full of lies and propaganda and I don't need the state of Texas or any other to convince me of that truth.
I couldn't agree more. Still, politicians and courts try to mandate illicit agendas, and abandoned even the idea of serving the people. Does the US have a legitimate government?
'How can we claim to live in a representative democracy when its citizens’ paths for the redress of wrongs are deliberately closed for the benefit of its most powerful institutions?'
Obviously, we don't, and haven't for a long time.
Times change, and it is time for a change, by force if need be. The tree needs work, and the American people are ready to do a little gardening.
There is a reason for the Second Amendment and that reason is NOT about hunting...It is the responsibility of 'The People' to remove the Govt. when it becomes tyrannical and Govt. is tyrannical and not CONSTITUTIONAL. Time for 'The People' to rise.
Throughout the last three to four years; evil has exposed itself more than EVER before...We know their names, where they are found and how to pursue them.
This is perhaps the most dangerous time in history as they have their Advanced Technology, Money, Resources and it's obvious they have no care about 'The People' or planet...And, as they are immature and selfish; if they can't have the planet, then by God nobody will and they'll seek to destroy all life of it, on it and in it.
It is imperative for all of 'The People' to stand together in unity in opposition to 'The Establishment'; to pursue, indict, try all fairly before removing all wealth from families and executing those in conspiracy to destroy all life on the planet leaving only a shell for WHAT to benefit...
EXACTLY WHAT BENEFITS FROM THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL LIFE?
FTA: When the courts stop working to hold the powerful accountable, where are the victims to turn next?
History: revolt.
Not a single popular uprising won in history. A revolt is probably being provoked in order to introduce national emergency, martial law, and announce gun confiscation. It won't take more than a few months for the US population to be reduced to the projected 50 million...
FWIW, I think the American Revolution might be characterized as a popular uprising that succeeded, at least for a couple hundred years. If you count the current collapse of the country as a popular uprising failure, then it is fair to say that none has succeeded, at least not in the long run.
Yes, it could be, but it didn't do much for the average American that was worth dying for. Those who owned assets, on the other hand, didn't have to pay taxes to the Crown anymore, and were able to use the money saved on investments, which ultimately led to the Civil War, because slavery was not as flexible and lucrative as capitalism and "democracy" for those in power. As long as the territories were growing, the situation remained unstable, but newcomers at least had a chance to receive farmlands (that, of course, many of them lost soon after). That was a major advantage over the "Crown" owning every piece of land.
The growing territories of the US opened up room for scavengers like the Rockefellers, and the power struggles were finalized after the Civil War that won for the globalist bankers. The Articles of Confederation were replaced with the Constitution, which opened up the path for centralization under the Federal Government that soon openly betrayed the people. By the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (and the founding of the IRS, the Fed's lapdog), the country was fully lost.
In a way, Russia 1917 could also be called a "win" for the poor, but it only won, because the reds occupied the food supply at a time, when the choice was between starving to death or joining them...
All true; would that average Americans understood much of this.
I'm not sure the Russian Revolution was a win for the poor; millions starved to death after the revolution when the new government requisitioned every single grain of crops to feed the big cities. Even those who joined the Reds were reduced to abject poverty and starvation, something typical if Socialist governments.
The same thing will happen to today's enablers and enforcers, who seem to be acting under the delusion that they are special. Once they complete their dirty work, they'll be culled just the same.
Revolution? No. Quietly cleaning house. Yes!
.”When the courts stop working to hold the powerful accountable, where are the victims to turn next?”
The Founders had an answer for that.
The American Revolution was won for the upper middle. It was a power switch, when a new ruling class triumphed. Needless to say, it was the same bankers who financed the American Revolution AND the British Crown...
Gottlieb knew exactly what he did .
Paxton's approach to this was a problem. These bioweapons were formulated and distributed by the DOD as an EUA countermeasure which sets aside all normal issues of redress. Sasha Latypova has written on this in exquisite detail on her stack.
Interesting table here showing that the PREP Act is allowing the Texas' pharmacists to shoot up people with the pfizer pfunk.
https://www.pharmacy.texas.gov/files_pdf/coronavirus/PREP-TSBP-comparison.pdf
Nuremberg 2.0 needs to happen
Unfortunately it can't happen since the war/PREP Act hasn't ended so the killing continues.
That's one of the many things that is not going to happen. For example:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-phantom-of-lawsuits
And a lot of other things have never worked, but keep coming up as solutions:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/do-not-comply-no-kidding
What works? Preparation and keeping in touch with others:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-most-important-thing-anyone-can
We are ruled by psycho-sociopaths
No liability = no usage. I refuse to use any product that does not consider itself worthy of providing liability protection to the user. It is 1,000% obvious that fizer and moderna both know their mRNA products are extremely dangerous and that is why they refuse to back them up. Both are criminal enterprises operating with a mission statement full of lies and propaganda and I don't need the state of Texas or any other to convince me of that truth.
I couldn't agree more. Still, politicians and courts try to mandate illicit agendas, and abandoned even the idea of serving the people. Does the US have a legitimate government?
These political and Corps want Open
revolt . Be patient, it will likely be delivered.
'How can we claim to live in a representative democracy when its citizens’ paths for the redress of wrongs are deliberately closed for the benefit of its most powerful institutions?'
Obviously, we don't, and haven't for a long time.
Times change, and it is time for a change, by force if need be. The tree needs work, and the American people are ready to do a little gardening.
There is a reason for the Second Amendment and that reason is NOT about hunting...It is the responsibility of 'The People' to remove the Govt. when it becomes tyrannical and Govt. is tyrannical and not CONSTITUTIONAL. Time for 'The People' to rise.
Throughout the last three to four years; evil has exposed itself more than EVER before...We know their names, where they are found and how to pursue them.
This is perhaps the most dangerous time in history as they have their Advanced Technology, Money, Resources and it's obvious they have no care about 'The People' or planet...And, as they are immature and selfish; if they can't have the planet, then by God nobody will and they'll seek to destroy all life of it, on it and in it.
It is imperative for all of 'The People' to stand together in unity in opposition to 'The Establishment'; to pursue, indict, try all fairly before removing all wealth from families and executing those in conspiracy to destroy all life on the planet leaving only a shell for WHAT to benefit...
EXACTLY WHAT BENEFITS FROM THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL LIFE?
WHAT REMAINS AFTER ALL ORGANIC LIFE IS DESTROYED?
A curse on all Pfizer criminals