31 Comments
User's avatar
Elizabeth Glass's avatar

To my knowledge the U.S. stands alone in this policy, but children who are born in the U.S. to a non-citizen mother (born outside the U.S.) - whether the mother is here legally or illegally - becomes an American citizen (and arguably becomes a slave via the birth certificate…a whole other subject).

Lilly's avatar

Correct, this is an article of the Amendment.

Edwin's avatar

To "SAVE" their asses, by empowering foreign voters.

The bastards & bitches.

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

The obstetrical office I’m in is full of immigrants on Medicaid. The one pregnant woman, commutes from Albanian , another from Yemen , another from Pakistan . All have had children at this practice but somehow they are on Medicaid but not citizens and must come from money to fly back and forth. I don’t know the answer , or how to fix it but something is not right. How do they get through security at the airport? Also , at the hospital, if an immigrant delivers with no insurance, the hospital can back bill and get Medicaid to pay for the delivery. This was never done years ago , and the hospital took a loss on the delivery. Something has changed dramatically.

Kat Bro's avatar

🤨🧐😳 And I wonder why my blood work doubled in price in 6mos. WE are paying for all of this!!!

J. Edward's avatar

The “security “ is to keep the citizens under control

Lilly's avatar

Ma'am you are confused with the details. Medicaid is a state insurance. If you move to another state, you have to pay for that Medicaid program. Each state can have their own criteria, such as income level.

So to say that pregnant women from 3 countries are flying in for ob appointments, no ma'am.

Decode the World's avatar

Excellent post, this needs to go far and wide.

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Please share everywhere, I'm trying to get this to the House reps. Andy Biggs already knows...please share with your reps.

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Thank you so much my sweet friend!

Crixcyon's avatar

..."People who elect corrupt politicians are not victims but accomplices. —George Orwell"...some comfort, they are all corrupt because if they don't go along with the DC Swamp agenda, they are kicked out of the club.

eyes open's avatar

Kind of OT, but yet not so much. Huge development as John Campbell is highlighting the self-assembling nanoparticles asserted aspect of the covid19 vaccinations. The video has not as of now been removed, amazingly enough. He titled it in a cryptic fashion i think as not to draw attention to the contents. Although the substack world has known about this for some time now it is new to many of his viewers as it evident by viewing the comments. Although Campbell has detractors and made mistakes early on, better late than never, and he is getting something very important out on the street. Almost 200k views as of this writing. Let us hope it stays up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEgjuB-0bw8

Ruth H's avatar

Wow. Thanks for this clarification. Here I thought Speaker Johnson was finally doing something right by attaching SAVE Act to spending bill. Now I understand this Act does nothing but harm us. Why can’t Congress issue a clean clear concise bill that would be easily understood and passed that would actually protect and benefit our voting rights as citizens and help curtail fraud.

jean's avatar

Because they are "tricksters".

Linda's avatar

Remember, whatever the title of their bill or act is, they always do the opposite.

Nnikk's avatar

Thank you for this post.

briezeeway's avatar

Thanks for sharing.

Lilly's avatar

This is not correct information. Anchor babies are those who are born in the US and are US citizens.

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

You obviously didn't read the entire article:

The SAVE Act actually nullifies what Senator Jacob Howard said when he introduced the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause, “Its grant of citizenship would not include persons born in the United States who are foreigners or aliens.”

John Roberts's avatar

Just assume that the name of any bill, is the opposite of what the name of the bill implies.

Gladiator's avatar

Show me the specific language of the save act that gives citizenship to illegals born here ie beware of this articles obvious bias and the writers liberal agenda. She decrys the article 5 constitutional assy of states, which is a path out of our deep state Dem quagmire, then demonizes Chip Roy with obvious liberal, tear down tactics. Just watch Mr. Roy address congress and you know he is a conservative patriot, despises big gov and hates their overreach. Quite opposite of what this biased article says.

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

go to the full bill, NOT the overview, which I did the first time around and made a huge mistake. The full bill is where the danger lies. Read it, not the summary which is what the politicians want you to read.

DeborahLynnPalmer's avatar

So, after reading this, it tells me that just because Kamala was born here, to a parent from Jamaica and a parent from India, neither US citizens, that she would not be eligible to run for President of the United States States of America and is illegally the Vice President…, what say you?

And to boot, she didn’t even grow up here in the United States of America, she grew up in Canada. What is going on, here? Am I off base or does this situation wreak of questions?

Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

You are right. Our founders stated in that only citizens born to citizen parents can run for president. So anchor babies are not eligible. If a couple comes here and they become citizens and then have children, those children ARE eligible.