One doctor doesn't matter. Nor 10, nor 100. 1000 might begin to gain attention, but won't immediately change anything. Correcting this disaster requires all hands on deck -- a wide spread revolt by medical and non medical populations. It's coming.
Okay folks, here’s how the game is played. Most people haven’t heard of this doctor, so the media will preempt it and go on the attack, calling him an “anti vaxx extremist.”
Character attacks are the order of the day. Your job is to simply reply in any comment section that’s bashing him, “That’s weird… a lot of doctors are becoming anti-vaxx lately.”
Or,
“Isn’t it odd how all these doctors are becoming anti vaxx, but the pharmaceutical owned media is still pushing the vaccines?”
That too! For me, I find doubt to be the most effective tool because 99.9999% of these people are driven by narcissism. They’re not driven by “science,” they’re driven by their own ego, and them regurgitating media talking points and calling it “science” stokes their ego, and reminds them that they’re the smartest person in the room (in their mind).
Why do you think all these sciency science science people are all baristas and moron journalists. Have you ever met someone with a journalism degree? They’re too stupid to get an actual degree in a science field.
Arguing against these people damages their fragile ego. Its an attack against them. They’ll defend it to the last…. It’s like trying to feed a petulant child. You have to trick them into thinking they figured it out for themselves, like it was their idea. Sowing doubt is the best way in my experience. Doubt, and very dry wit.
Kinda late to the party? 🤔🙄
This could be huge...if it’s picked up by the MSM and people get their heads outta their buttocks and LISTEN UP!
One doctor doesn't matter. Nor 10, nor 100. 1000 might begin to gain attention, but won't immediately change anything. Correcting this disaster requires all hands on deck -- a wide spread revolt by medical and non medical populations. It's coming.
It starts with one brave soul.
Starting is necessary, but not sufficient. Others, with greater influence, have been leading the criticisms for years, to no avail.
Praying it happens soon
So excited to see the attention this paper and press conference is getting. Great job presenting this and thank you for sharing!
🙏 💕💕💕
Right back at you! 💗💗🙏🏼💗💗
Okay folks, here’s how the game is played. Most people haven’t heard of this doctor, so the media will preempt it and go on the attack, calling him an “anti vaxx extremist.”
Character attacks are the order of the day. Your job is to simply reply in any comment section that’s bashing him, “That’s weird… a lot of doctors are becoming anti-vaxx lately.”
Or,
“Isn’t it odd how all these doctors are becoming anti vaxx, but the pharmaceutical owned media is still pushing the vaccines?”
Sow doubt. Don’t argue…, sow doubt.
Great strategy; sow doubt. Someone will get worried they might miss the big story and another media source will beat them to the gold.
That too! For me, I find doubt to be the most effective tool because 99.9999% of these people are driven by narcissism. They’re not driven by “science,” they’re driven by their own ego, and them regurgitating media talking points and calling it “science” stokes their ego, and reminds them that they’re the smartest person in the room (in their mind).
Why do you think all these sciency science science people are all baristas and moron journalists. Have you ever met someone with a journalism degree? They’re too stupid to get an actual degree in a science field.
Arguing against these people damages their fragile ego. Its an attack against them. They’ll defend it to the last…. It’s like trying to feed a petulant child. You have to trick them into thinking they figured it out for themselves, like it was their idea. Sowing doubt is the best way in my experience. Doubt, and very dry wit.