17 Comments

TheyLied. Join the campaign to Take Action and Raise Public Awareness at 

https://TheyLied.ca/

.

Here is a 9 min. video that explains the idea 

https://theylied.substack.com/p/theylied-time-for-action-and-raising

.

Ways you can help Raise Public Awareness 

https://theylied.ca/SpreadTheWord.shtml

.

Ways you can Take Action 

https://theylied.ca/TakeAction.shtml

.

With your help, everyone will know ... TheyLied.ca

.

Expand full comment

This should be #1: the existence of viruses has never been proven. Taking a “vaccine” for something nonexistent is just silly, in addition to its being extremely toxic.

Expand full comment
author

🎯

Expand full comment

Truly Outstanding. Thanks.

Expand full comment
author

🙏

Expand full comment

..."IT WAS ALL A LIE - we were lied to - it's time to learn the TRUTH."...that applies to 95% of all drugs. Big pharma is the biggest criminal undertaking and life threatening operation ever invented. And 95% of humanity buys into it lock, stock and syringe. They love their drugs.

Expand full comment

Pharmaceutical drug pushers that create Pharmaceutical drug addicts.

Expand full comment
Jul 13·edited Jul 13

Good article. I am familiar with vaccine injuries but my initial reaction is to say - I don't care if there are 1,000 vaccines. The issue is coercion. If a person voluntarily chooses to take a different toxic Frankenshot every day, then go for it - "My body my choice". But don't deny basic citizen rights and freedoms if a person (or parent for a child) chooses not to follow the CDC "schedule".

The problem with my initial reaction is Larry Cook's reason #10 - Lies. The average citizen does not have time and knowledge to investigate every toxic injection, so they have to rely on healthcare providers and "experts". And when it come to vaccines, they LIE.

Expand full comment

And even when they are presented with the documents to show that the drug or vax they take is harmful or could kill them, most of them still don’t believe. The ones paying attention know why they don’t.

Expand full comment

Just finished reading Dr Michael Nehls The Indoctrinated Brain. What an eye opener and I have been suspicious since this scam was first foisted on us in 2020!

Expand full comment

I read that, too. Exceptional book. I knew it was a sham when in April of 2020 James Bullard with the St. Louis Federal Reserve stated on Face the Nation that Immunity Badges and daily testing (via a PCR test that was not meant for diagnostic purposes per the inventor...who magically died) would be the solution to reopen society/economy. I also look at what the clowns from BIS promote such as CBDC. My career experience with federally sponsored research involved a lot of coercion to manufacture data so I’m always suspicious of that & will forever not trust “the science” unless I do it myself.

Expand full comment

The most important thing is reality, right now.

And the first question is:

# 1. Who gets to vote in the: general election?

a. citizens only - Yes No

b. natural born citizens only - Yes No

c. naturalized citizens (legal immigrants) - Yes No

d. legal immigrants not yet naturalized - Yes No

e. anyone with a drivers license – Yes - No

# 2.1 Ages of Voter

f. minimum18 years

g. minimum 21 years

h. minimum 25 years

i. minimum 30 years

# 2.2 Sex of Voter

a. Male – Yes - No

b. Female – Yes - No

c. Non – Binanry - Yes - No

d. Transgender - Yes - No

# 2.3 Competence of Voter

e. property owners net value over $50,000 - Yes - No

f. property owners net value over $250,000 - Yes - No

g. have paid a minimum of $5000 per year of tax combined jurisdictions (school district, county, city, state, federal) - Yes - No

h. those receiving welfare / food stamps – Yes - No

i. tax exempt persons – Yes - No

j. those with unpaid child support obligations - Yes - No

k. those receiving WIC – Yes - No

l. those receiving Section 8 – Yes - No

m. those working for government bureaucracies – Yes - No

# 2.4 Genetic presence of Voter

a. Male without children – Yes - No

b. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No

c. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No

d. Female without children – Yes - No

e. Only married males with children who have never been divorced should be allowed to vote. – Yes - No

Expand full comment

Hmm, back to the 1700s you go, right?

Expand full comment

We all have our own truth, and egregious wrong we would like to correct, but reality is the only thing that matters.

Since our government officials and talking heads taut our system as a civilized democracy, voting to change government policy is the only means we have to redress our grievances.

Therefore, reality dictates that we clarify who gets to vote and how the vote is counted and what specific impact the sacred vote has at the business end of government.

Expand full comment

Most illnesses purported to be "prevented" by vaccines are easily cured in healthy patients. Vaccines reduce healthiness.

Expand full comment

Bill Gates has a billion reasons for vaccines. Each reason has a dollar sign attached.

Expand full comment

Hmm, I thought the Constitution and its amendments answer most of those questions. One person, one vote. If you want to keep non-property owners from voting, you were likely born in the wrong century. Property ownership, parenthood status, gender, or sexual identity, should have nothing to do with voting rights.

Expand full comment