9 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Thank you so much for this article and links, and the research it took to bring them all together here.

I do have one question about this statement: "The CDC update changed the lethal exposure from 100PPM to 100,000PPM."

While I can identify / verify all the other dates and figures cited in your article, I am unable to locate the specific increase to 100,000PPM in the January 2023 update to the toxiological profile found at:

https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp20.pdf

When I share information with folks who are skeptical of anything outside their comfort zone, I present specifically where they can find what I'm sharing with them.

Would you please let me know which page this is on? I really appreciate it.

Expand full comment

Piggybacking on @Kavita

Ditto.

Saw OSHA info on vinyl chloride last updated 2021 related to ppm limits from AIHA ERPGs/Environmental Response Planning Guidelines (hazardous chemical exposure limits; American Industrial Hygiene Association) which shows some discrepancy compared to new CDC updates but it’s sort of apples to zucchini.

https://www.osha.gov/chemicaldata/566

Any screenshots of earlier CDC info? All help so appreciated!

Expand full comment

I believe Jikkyleaks on twitter has the receipts on this.

Expand full comment

Spent an hour looking and I can't find anything on Jikkyleaks twitter feed speaking directly to this. If you can find it, MyCovidBubble, please post a link here! Much appreciate if you do.

Expand full comment

Thanks. Don’t do twitter, never did. I’ll figure something out.

Expand full comment

@Heterodox Introvert ~

I just realized this article is a re-post of an article from Newspunch, penned by Baxter Dmitry ... I overlooked this earlier. Here's the article link:

https://newspunch.com/inside-job-cdc-changed-toxicity-info-on-vinyl-chloride-days-before-derailment/

Just left the Baxter Dmitry of the article a question in the comments section there.

If he doesn't reply, I'm not going to presume the PPM info is accurate. Not that I believe CDC wouldn't do it - I'm quite sure they would and probably did. But I won't quote material if it's not trackable.

Expand full comment

Addendum: also just wrote to Dmitry at his email address (Newspunch).

Lots and lots of folks on Substack and Twitter are asking this question, as well.

Hopefully there's something to back it up. It's a bummer when figures get tossed around as truth when they're made-up. I've certainly fallen for misinformation before! Hence the vetting process now.

Expand full comment

Hm. Separate but still not verifiable verbal report of CDC change. In 2nd or 3rd call he takes. Either somebody else found earlier info per comparison or could just be just repeating -? Also, don’t want to hang the anchor or the intake call screener. Program is news focused but let’s face it, ultimately entertainment. Still...

https://theinfowar.tv/watch?id=63efd00ce3bdde37b459fa5f

Final call is interesting. Again not verifiable but I can understand desire for anonymity. Bet there’s more than a few out there with 🎯 on their front and back.

Expand full comment

Thanks, HI, will check this out. Totally agree that many these days are targeted for all manner of things.

As for this claim: "The CDC update changed the lethal exposure from 100PPM to 100,000PPM.", I'm just letting it go and not sharing 'til (and if) I am able to verify.

Have asked 6 different sources who posted / re-posted it if they can verify, and no one has responded. Not worried about it.

Everything in the news stream comes and goes so quickly now, it's already distant history.

Expand full comment