I would not eat the so called fish and I highly recommend inspection to every thing that you and your family intend to eat bc it probably is not what it seems. There is a reckoning coming unlike anything ever seen in this world before.
You access such in depth articles. It is hard to imagine how you do this. I must admit that I have to take a 'time out' on occasion because everything is depressing these days and I need, at times, just to encounter a mid summers sunset or incredible cloud formation in the canvas that is the heavens and just appreciate being in the moment for I have no idea how many I will have before my time is complete. Just to bask in the beauty that is still there amid st all of this darkness and evil.
Confronting China and other aggressive regimes is the right approach. Confronting bullies is always necessary to prevent being bullied. But we must have the capability to back up the bluster. The US surrendered to goat herders in Afghanistan. Unlikely any bullies take nan's bluster seriously.
Wired magazine devoted an entire issue about a year and a half ago to a Clancyesque novel about a confrontation between China and the US and regional allies. China won. US military capabilities have gotten worse since then, and china's have gotten better. They're likely to respond more emphatically than a few military drills, and the US will be stymied again. It's a dangerous world. Another word for "woke military" is "losers."
Most of them, lately. Few of them when we had our focus. If your game is who is most aggressive, US loses. If it comes to conflict, aggression wins, every time.
You appear to have a willful ignorance of all the conflicts the US provoked and ventured into, using covert and overt aggression, which do not benefit Americans in any way.
US government was captured by 1913. 50 years ago, it started preparing for an outright assault against its people. Now the war is in the final stage, citizens are poisoned with slow-kill injections, and you think "the bully" is foreign regimes, and it's "the US" vs. China.
Your imaginary war is just conventional opportunism. Tyrants only succeed against the weak and submissive. Your imaginary superiors are only as superior as you allow them to be. Maybe when you resolve your insecurities you'll find more effective tactics than paranoia.
All the poisoned citizens were volunteers. Misled, for sure, but willingly cooperated. That's what bullies rely on -- easy targets.
I would not eat the so called fish and I highly recommend inspection to every thing that you and your family intend to eat bc it probably is not what it seems. There is a reckoning coming unlike anything ever seen in this world before.
You access such in depth articles. It is hard to imagine how you do this. I must admit that I have to take a 'time out' on occasion because everything is depressing these days and I need, at times, just to encounter a mid summers sunset or incredible cloud formation in the canvas that is the heavens and just appreciate being in the moment for I have no idea how many I will have before my time is complete. Just to bask in the beauty that is still there amid st all of this darkness and evil.
Thank you.
Confronting China and other aggressive regimes is the right approach. Confronting bullies is always necessary to prevent being bullied. But we must have the capability to back up the bluster. The US surrendered to goat herders in Afghanistan. Unlikely any bullies take nan's bluster seriously.
Wired magazine devoted an entire issue about a year and a half ago to a Clancyesque novel about a confrontation between China and the US and regional allies. China won. US military capabilities have gotten worse since then, and china's have gotten better. They're likely to respond more emphatically than a few military drills, and the US will be stymied again. It's a dangerous world. Another word for "woke military" is "losers."
"China and other aggressive regimes?" Like, are you stupid?
Which regime is more aggressive than the Western alliance, led by the US?
Most of them, lately. Few of them when we had our focus. If your game is who is most aggressive, US loses. If it comes to conflict, aggression wins, every time.
You appear to have a willful ignorance of all the conflicts the US provoked and ventured into, using covert and overt aggression, which do not benefit Americans in any way.
US government was captured by 1913. 50 years ago, it started preparing for an outright assault against its people. Now the war is in the final stage, citizens are poisoned with slow-kill injections, and you think "the bully" is foreign regimes, and it's "the US" vs. China.
Your imaginary war is just conventional opportunism. Tyrants only succeed against the weak and submissive. Your imaginary superiors are only as superior as you allow them to be. Maybe when you resolve your insecurities you'll find more effective tactics than paranoia.
All the poisoned citizens were volunteers. Misled, for sure, but willingly cooperated. That's what bullies rely on -- easy targets.
Paranoia is anxiety or fear. Of this, I have very little. :)
The rest of what you wrote sounds halfway right, and halfway like a person who is in on it.