I think the FDA is using the regulation/assumption since it was "safe and effective" as an EAU (an inherent contradiction in terms) they don't have to put anything based on MNRA through any clinical studies anymore. Like they are doing for RSV, etc. etc. etc.
I think the FDA is using the regulation/assumption since it was "safe and effective" as an EAU (an inherent contradiction in terms) they don't have to put anything based on MNRA through any clinical studies anymore. Like they are doing for RSV, etc. etc. etc.
I think the FDA is using the regulation/assumption since it was "safe and effective" as an EAU (an inherent contradiction in terms) they don't have to put anything based on MNRA through any clinical studies anymore. Like they are doing for RSV, etc. etc. etc.