Following is the one question that I would love for Dr Malone to answer. Dr Malone, as the one who claims and is attributed to being the inventor of this MRNA technology and with all your intimate expertise on the science, why on earth would you have risked your life and health by allowing yourself to be injected with this WARP SPEED TOXIN ??!!
Perhaps both Malone AND Peters are controlled opposition? Perhaps the lawsuit is no more real or actionable than that against Alex Jones? Perhaps people should just get on with their own lives, paying attention to their own families, and building their own strong networks with those around them in their physical communities and not waste time on the circus and theatre that is in the virtual (internet) world?
Focus. Get on with managing your OWN lives, which is all that you can control and know the veracity of.
I guess you’d have to BE Dr. Malone to understand the true ins and outs of what the Breggins did. He is not the type of man who sues people Willy Nilly. My bet is that it is justified!
Thank you for sharing your outrage! I think Dr. Malone has been a sleeper for the other side with this move! I have listened to all of these people and this does not pass the smell test. Dr. Malone has lost nothing in all of this from the people he is falsely suing and I consider that lawsuit bogus and intended to hurt the truth from continuing to get out. He has lost all credibility by his actions in my eyes!
Why isn't Malone suing the establishment media companies/mainstream journalists for defamation? A five second search of "Robert Malone" leads to a Wikipedia entry, an Atlantic article and a NY Times article ALL accusing him of being a misinformation spreader. Are they named in the lawsuit? Instead we have the Breggins? An elderly couple with a self-published book that hardly anyone has read. Ruby and Peters occupy a niche within a niche within a niche on the right. So why sue these people and not the others?
I'm not well informed on this fight, but I have heard Dr Malone speak in person and have read many of his writings. My impression is he is a man of honor, integrity, wisdom and courage, so I wouldn't take sides against him. It's sad though to have this fight take place between people I believe should be on the same side fighting the greater enemy.
So, judge Diana wants to circumvent judicial processes and pass her own judgement. Her right to do so, our right to judge her emotional rant as creating the destruction she decries, and ignore her. Better to wait for the courts to decide. Maybe Diana will also instruct us on how UFC judges should decide fights, or priests should decide confessions. Hard to tell if she's just a crybaby, or another tool in the fauch army.
For those who are unaware, Malone has been under continuous assault by fauch and his enforcers and propagandists for almost three years. This absolutely correct lawsuit will probably finance a lot more litigation. The vicious attacks on truth must end, or our civilization won't survive. Then we'll resolve disputes the old fashioned way. My money will be on the cowboy.
I'm so appalled by these lawsuit. I thought they were fighting the same fight, but of course opinions may differ, like soliders can have a different opinion according to what front they're seeing and confront. I can't judge the situation, but someone out there must be laughing real hard that this crumbling and attacks have started amongst whistle blowers. How come they have foundations and means of raising money and suddenly they can afford time, energy and lawyers for such a time as this? I'm just afraid it's gonna start a trend...
Thanks for putting some of my thoughts in writing. Shocking is the least of it. Does this add fire to the smoke that Malone is "controlled opposition?" Malone is a famous and, I think, fairly wealthy person, certainly putting himself in the pubic eye; he essentially is a public figure. And, FWIW, he seems to have borrowed and endorsed someone else's theory; Desmet's, which is controversial in its own right,, and a theory that certainly cannot be "proven" or refuted. So, he should expect some level of pushback and criticism. That's what happens in public life. So, ether he is trying to shut them up to keep them from doing more harm to the covid movement, or he is striking back, or both.
It's all beginning to remind me more and more of the infighting and petty jealousies within religions and cults. Our battle is big enough without fighting each other. My dad, Dave Hunt, was an influential Christian author in the 1980s and I learned a lot from him. I didn't always agree with him, but I had the greatest love and respect. He stayed independent and humble. He refused the offers of agents to represent him and didn't ask for fees when he spoke, just an offering of whatever the group could afford, even though at times he was booked 3 years in advance and could have well demanded big money. He traveled to places like the Soviet Union on his own dime and slept on sofas in small apartments of the pastors of the churches where he preached. As a family, we traveled all over the world and even smuggled Bibles behind the "Iron Curtain," and extremely dangerous endeavor. He blasted the prosperity preachers of the time, and they all hated him LOL. Anyway, what I learned was to keep my focus on the real battle and not be distracted by petty jealousies or arguments, fame or riches. That's my standard and I'm thankful to have had such an inspiring example.
Nothing 'shocking' from an egocentric full of himself, all over internet self advertising person. When you live 'big', you need big money. If it was about principles, he would sue for a penny. Bad move this time.
Following is the one question that I would love for Dr Malone to answer. Dr Malone, as the one who claims and is attributed to being the inventor of this MRNA technology and with all your intimate expertise on the science, why on earth would you have risked your life and health by allowing yourself to be injected with this WARP SPEED TOXIN ??!!
Perhaps both Malone AND Peters are controlled opposition? Perhaps the lawsuit is no more real or actionable than that against Alex Jones? Perhaps people should just get on with their own lives, paying attention to their own families, and building their own strong networks with those around them in their physical communities and not waste time on the circus and theatre that is in the virtual (internet) world?
Focus. Get on with managing your OWN lives, which is all that you can control and know the veracity of.
Controlled opposition? IDK… seems like he’s suing the wrong side! 🧐
I guess you’d have to BE Dr. Malone to understand the true ins and outs of what the Breggins did. He is not the type of man who sues people Willy Nilly. My bet is that it is justified!
Thank you for sharing your outrage! I think Dr. Malone has been a sleeper for the other side with this move! I have listened to all of these people and this does not pass the smell test. Dr. Malone has lost nothing in all of this from the people he is falsely suing and I consider that lawsuit bogus and intended to hurt the truth from continuing to get out. He has lost all credibility by his actions in my eyes!
What would Dr. Yeadon say ?
The whole cluster saddens me. Thank you for your post .
good that I never subscribed to his Substack, could have been on that list too...
His mental state seems to be jeopardized, very seriously.
If the author of this post seems to be endangered by this comment, I give the permission to erase it immediately.
Why isn't Malone suing the establishment media companies/mainstream journalists for defamation? A five second search of "Robert Malone" leads to a Wikipedia entry, an Atlantic article and a NY Times article ALL accusing him of being a misinformation spreader. Are they named in the lawsuit? Instead we have the Breggins? An elderly couple with a self-published book that hardly anyone has read. Ruby and Peters occupy a niche within a niche within a niche on the right. So why sue these people and not the others?
I'm not well informed on this fight, but I have heard Dr Malone speak in person and have read many of his writings. My impression is he is a man of honor, integrity, wisdom and courage, so I wouldn't take sides against him. It's sad though to have this fight take place between people I believe should be on the same side fighting the greater enemy.
So, judge Diana wants to circumvent judicial processes and pass her own judgement. Her right to do so, our right to judge her emotional rant as creating the destruction she decries, and ignore her. Better to wait for the courts to decide. Maybe Diana will also instruct us on how UFC judges should decide fights, or priests should decide confessions. Hard to tell if she's just a crybaby, or another tool in the fauch army.
For those who are unaware, Malone has been under continuous assault by fauch and his enforcers and propagandists for almost three years. This absolutely correct lawsuit will probably finance a lot more litigation. The vicious attacks on truth must end, or our civilization won't survive. Then we'll resolve disputes the old fashioned way. My money will be on the cowboy.
frivolous, malicious, chilling … if you’re confident in your ideas, you don’t have to resort to this.
I'm so appalled by these lawsuit. I thought they were fighting the same fight, but of course opinions may differ, like soliders can have a different opinion according to what front they're seeing and confront. I can't judge the situation, but someone out there must be laughing real hard that this crumbling and attacks have started amongst whistle blowers. How come they have foundations and means of raising money and suddenly they can afford time, energy and lawyers for such a time as this? I'm just afraid it's gonna start a trend...
Thanks for putting some of my thoughts in writing. Shocking is the least of it. Does this add fire to the smoke that Malone is "controlled opposition?" Malone is a famous and, I think, fairly wealthy person, certainly putting himself in the pubic eye; he essentially is a public figure. And, FWIW, he seems to have borrowed and endorsed someone else's theory; Desmet's, which is controversial in its own right,, and a theory that certainly cannot be "proven" or refuted. So, he should expect some level of pushback and criticism. That's what happens in public life. So, ether he is trying to shut them up to keep them from doing more harm to the covid movement, or he is striking back, or both.
It's all beginning to remind me more and more of the infighting and petty jealousies within religions and cults. Our battle is big enough without fighting each other. My dad, Dave Hunt, was an influential Christian author in the 1980s and I learned a lot from him. I didn't always agree with him, but I had the greatest love and respect. He stayed independent and humble. He refused the offers of agents to represent him and didn't ask for fees when he spoke, just an offering of whatever the group could afford, even though at times he was booked 3 years in advance and could have well demanded big money. He traveled to places like the Soviet Union on his own dime and slept on sofas in small apartments of the pastors of the churches where he preached. As a family, we traveled all over the world and even smuggled Bibles behind the "Iron Curtain," and extremely dangerous endeavor. He blasted the prosperity preachers of the time, and they all hated him LOL. Anyway, what I learned was to keep my focus on the real battle and not be distracted by petty jealousies or arguments, fame or riches. That's my standard and I'm thankful to have had such an inspiring example.
Nothing 'shocking' from an egocentric full of himself, all over internet self advertising person. When you live 'big', you need big money. If it was about principles, he would sue for a penny. Bad move this time.