"As a discipline, GOF does not exist...It’s another kind of fraud, containing some real things, the cause of which are attributed to non-existent viruses."
There is no "gain-of-function research." The (sooner-or-later) lethal injections were obviously developed in "secret" labs. The fact that they were in Russia and China clearly demonstrates that all these "superpowers" are just humble servants to the game-masters.
For that matter, this has been clear from the very beginning of the Great Plandemic of 2020...
Gain of Fiction's shadowy plot exquisitely unraveled by Mike Yeadon and brought before the light of scrutiny at Exposing the Darkness, a masterfully constructed lighthouse guiding ships safely to port in these stormy times.
I very much respect Mike's opinion, but I will disagree with him in one aspect of his submission that Flu is not infectious.
I have personally witnessed the spread of Flu in my office. Hence once anybody has the Flu the person is told to stay home until the infection is over.
My take on viruses is that these are infectious secretion from our immune systems when compromised. However the genes from these secretions are what are referred to viruses which can be manipulated to make it more infectious or less infectious and this is what is referred to as Gain of Function (GOF).
Well one could definitely hold your opinion, as many people currently do, the facts are that no one has been able to prove that the flu is infectious and capable of being spread via human to human contact even though many have tried. We have all "witnessed" what we believe to be the spread of an illness amongst people who live, work or spend a large amount of time together but that does not make it a fact. Epigenitics teaches us that the internal and external environments are what causes the gene to express thus creating a positive or negative effect on our health. That being said, it seems logical that the majority of people affected by a similar illness, sharing a similar workplace or home, have likely been exposed to similar external environmental conditions as well as internal/emotional environmental conditions.
Mike, millions of us who’ve been healthy for many years were atypically beset by illness during the plandemic. Maybe it wasn’t SARS Covid-2, but it was something very real. Interestingly, Ivermectin and/or Hydroxychloroquine were effective in treating it in the earliest stage. For you to omit this from the conversation generates a sense of mistrust by those of us who were impacted. It would be good if you could fill in the blanks here. I agree that numbers were pumped up by the PCR test as well as coordinated mislabeling illnesses and deaths but let’s get to the real point; what was it that likely caused so many atypical illnesses?
The reason why Fauci, CDC, Moderna and others have turned into Gain of Function research or (Darwin save us all ) is because not that long ago it became very clear that natural (evolutionary) processes weren't going to produce what they were hoping for and fast enough; i.e. for supposed pathogens, like viruses to become lethal and infectious etc.
Why?
Because there was not enough time to wait for 2 mutations to occur in their lifetime for pathogens to evolve.
To see what that means, consider that the point mutation rate (in a pathogen, like bacteria for example) is roughly one in a hundred million (1 in 10^8). So if two specific mutations had to occur at once hypothetically to make a pathogen infectious and lethal, that would be an event of likelihood about 1 in 10^16. Simply put, Fauci and other villains would be long gone before there would even be a slight chance of 2 specific mutations occurring in a pathogen. So, to justify and continue funding, they had no choice but to turn to Gain of Function research or the oxymoron often called directed evolution research… lol
Whether this is even mathematically or quantifiably possible is another story. I might drop a line soon on the theme…
Dr. Yeadon alluded to it a bit but I’m not sure most people understand what a “gain of function” really means when a lifesystem “gains function” it “didn’t have before”, like antibiotic resistance in bacteria or chloroquine resistance in malaria parasites…
There is no "gain-of-function research." The (sooner-or-later) lethal injections were obviously developed in "secret" labs. The fact that they were in Russia and China clearly demonstrates that all these "superpowers" are just humble servants to the game-masters.
For that matter, this has been clear from the very beginning of the Great Plandemic of 2020...
Well written, clear, unambiguous, and interesting.
This is the sort of essay that is easily received if someone is willing to read and consider it.
Thank you.
Bioweapon to depopulate.
Thanks for always being a rational scientific voice in the wilderness.
.
T H A N K Y O U
.
COVID was the first trillion-dollar virus:).
'virus' nudge-nudge, wink-wink! Say no more!
Gain of Fiction's shadowy plot exquisitely unraveled by Mike Yeadon and brought before the light of scrutiny at Exposing the Darkness, a masterfully constructed lighthouse guiding ships safely to port in these stormy times.
Mike
Thank you for being that man of Simplicity when it's needed the most.
This will be very useful to pass on to fence-hoppers
Unless someone's brain is way out there , they will now have to admit Ignorance by choice.
And may themselves get euthanised for the greater good to protect 'Society'
No Mercy
Thank you, Dr. Yeadon.
I very much respect Mike's opinion, but I will disagree with him in one aspect of his submission that Flu is not infectious.
I have personally witnessed the spread of Flu in my office. Hence once anybody has the Flu the person is told to stay home until the infection is over.
My take on viruses is that these are infectious secretion from our immune systems when compromised. However the genes from these secretions are what are referred to viruses which can be manipulated to make it more infectious or less infectious and this is what is referred to as Gain of Function (GOF).
Well one could definitely hold your opinion, as many people currently do, the facts are that no one has been able to prove that the flu is infectious and capable of being spread via human to human contact even though many have tried. We have all "witnessed" what we believe to be the spread of an illness amongst people who live, work or spend a large amount of time together but that does not make it a fact. Epigenitics teaches us that the internal and external environments are what causes the gene to express thus creating a positive or negative effect on our health. That being said, it seems logical that the majority of people affected by a similar illness, sharing a similar workplace or home, have likely been exposed to similar external environmental conditions as well as internal/emotional environmental conditions.
Mike, millions of us who’ve been healthy for many years were atypically beset by illness during the plandemic. Maybe it wasn’t SARS Covid-2, but it was something very real. Interestingly, Ivermectin and/or Hydroxychloroquine were effective in treating it in the earliest stage. For you to omit this from the conversation generates a sense of mistrust by those of us who were impacted. It would be good if you could fill in the blanks here. I agree that numbers were pumped up by the PCR test as well as coordinated mislabeling illnesses and deaths but let’s get to the real point; what was it that likely caused so many atypical illnesses?
Gain of Function or Waiting for Two Mutations
The reason why Fauci, CDC, Moderna and others have turned into Gain of Function research or (Darwin save us all ) is because not that long ago it became very clear that natural (evolutionary) processes weren't going to produce what they were hoping for and fast enough; i.e. for supposed pathogens, like viruses to become lethal and infectious etc.
Why?
Because there was not enough time to wait for 2 mutations to occur in their lifetime for pathogens to evolve.
To see what that means, consider that the point mutation rate (in a pathogen, like bacteria for example) is roughly one in a hundred million (1 in 10^8). So if two specific mutations had to occur at once hypothetically to make a pathogen infectious and lethal, that would be an event of likelihood about 1 in 10^16. Simply put, Fauci and other villains would be long gone before there would even be a slight chance of 2 specific mutations occurring in a pathogen. So, to justify and continue funding, they had no choice but to turn to Gain of Function research or the oxymoron often called directed evolution research… lol
Whether this is even mathematically or quantifiably possible is another story. I might drop a line soon on the theme…
Dr. Yeadon alluded to it a bit but I’m not sure most people understand what a “gain of function” really means when a lifesystem “gains function” it “didn’t have before”, like antibiotic resistance in bacteria or chloroquine resistance in malaria parasites…