As Dr Dixon said, his methods are only observational and he can't draw any conclusions. It would be nice if he was more precise. What vax? What magnification? What time span? But it's a good start. It's how advances in knowledge always begin.
Dr. Mike Yeadon asked Nixon the BEST question on the Fuellmich hearing just recently: can you assure that the disappearing is not simple 'out of focus' effect of his microscope during the extremely long exposure??? He was NOT able to answer that in a 100% convincing way, because the answer would be: NO. If you integrate DAYS of exposure in an open environment a liquid sample, clearly not only crystallization of all the salts has to occur, but equally temperature, humidity, DUST from air, all will have an impact on the final video... Without a proper control, I do not see this being a valid 'scientific proof' of anything...
Thank you for these links to your earlier material.
I have a lot of reading to do!
BRAVO
As Dr Dixon said, his methods are only observational and he can't draw any conclusions. It would be nice if he was more precise. What vax? What magnification? What time span? But it's a good start. It's how advances in knowledge always begin.
Dr. Mike Yeadon asked Nixon the BEST question on the Fuellmich hearing just recently: can you assure that the disappearing is not simple 'out of focus' effect of his microscope during the extremely long exposure??? He was NOT able to answer that in a 100% convincing way, because the answer would be: NO. If you integrate DAYS of exposure in an open environment a liquid sample, clearly not only crystallization of all the salts has to occur, but equally temperature, humidity, DUST from air, all will have an impact on the final video... Without a proper control, I do not see this being a valid 'scientific proof' of anything...