“This is an AI bioweapon. It is part technology and part biology. It is designed to hijack the human genome. It can be used to experiment on humans, and it can also be used to exterminate them."
But you responded to this article with pure emotion. Not only that, you keep trying to say I have an argument to make. What argument is that, exactly? You can think whatever you want about the various pieces of evidence but the fact that you won't even address that simple point of just allowing yourself to examine the stuff. Nobody really cares what you think anyways, nor what I think. Engage the evidence yourself. Stop ducking and dodging and moving goal posts. How you manage to turn this into another question is beyond me. You say you were a cop but I would say community police are more concerned with truth and try to use discretion wisely. Jackboots are servants to the state and don't engage evidence because discretion doesn't serve your ego or your paycheck. Now the question becomes what sort of cop were you because you certainly haven't gotten to the bottom of anything but you sure can punch down. I guess everyone gotta earn a paycheck...
GOD bless your dedication to being a TRUTH Warrior. I thank you deeply. This is Spiritual warfare - our GOD is the wind beneath your wings. We can't lose with GOD on our side ...
The enemies of freedom and liberty have clearly PLANNED this PLANdemic out to a great degree or detail.
1. Chinese lockdowns have given the Chicom Government cover to liquidate freedom loving protesters
2. American lockdowns have enabled our Communists to seize power from the people. We may NEVER get it back unless we fight spiritually and physically.
3. Conservatives tend to be small business owners. These people have been decimated by never ending lockdowns while Global Corporations thrive.
4. Forced vaccines will reveal those loyal to Socialist Governments, and those not.
5. Vaccines render everyone dependent on Government due to immunopathology
6. Vaccine induced ADE will be concealed by never ending “variants” and blamed on unvaccinated.
7. The LYING MARIXIST media, big tech, deep state, and medical establishment will make this unquestionable, censoring all whistleblowers
8. Boosters will give the appearance of fighting variants, when the reality is that it masks, or even furthers ADE making people more dependent on Government
9. The elderly will be decimated by the Clot Shots
10. Unvaccinated will be made scapegoats and pariahs.
Everything is Biology. It's not Biology merged with Technology. It's just that the "Tech" is anti-biological to so many. The question I grapple with is, is all social disruption and violence intentional? Are we ruled by psychopathic parasites who have captured Finance and Science? Do they lust to feed on the light of GOD which shines within each one of us?
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
The "Epicurean Paradox" tells us much about how these people think. Either they want to make God look weak and impotent or they want to trick him into action (there's a lot of evidence that suggests these people actually are trying to do this, although it's all over the place in fragments so I can't "send you a link").
Ultimately they want to become Gods themselves, and I think there is plenty of evidence of that as their ultimate goal via transhumanism.
"A man was trapped in his house during a flood. He began praying to God to rescue him. He had a vision in his head of God’s hand reaching down from heaven and lifting him to safety. The water started to rise in his house. His neighbour urged him to leave and offered him a ride to safety. The man yelled back, “I am waiting for God to save me.” The neighbour drove off in his pick-up truck.
The man continued to pray and hold on to his vision. As the water began rising in his house, he had to climb up to the roof. A boat came by with some people heading for safe ground. They yelled at the man to grab a rope they were ready to throw and take him to safety. He told them that he was waiting for God to save him. They shook their heads and moved on.
The man continued to pray, believing with all his heart that he would be saved by God. The flood waters continued to rise. A helicopter flew by and a voice came over a loudspeaker offering to lower a ladder and take him off the roof. The man waved the helicopter away, shouting back that he was waiting for God to save him. The helicopter left. The flooding water came over the roof and caught him up and swept him away. He drowned.
When he reached heaven and asked, “God, why did you not save me? I believed in you with all my heart. Why did you let me drown?” God replied, “I sent you a pick-up truck, a boat and a helicopter and you refused all of them. What else could I possibly do for you?”"
I guess I just meant that there's something about the way certain people approach the idea of power that's childishly simplistic, while pretending it's the result of deep thought and experience. The meaning I get from the flood story isn't so much that God directly sent rescuers, but that He equipped us with the ability to recognize the ways to get out of trouble.
Yes, I agree. And (maybe) people like Steve Kirsch, the owners of Substack and even people like myself (I started warning everyone I knew about these vaxxes in early 2021 and spent probably 80 hours a week on 4Chan and twitter sharing my research, I guess I saved at least a few hundred thousand people from them). Is that impulse to do the right thing "God working through you" or just doing what you believe to be the right thing?
I don't know.
Unfortunately, something like Covid was a complete headf**k. I knew that it was all a scam, but I'm a historian by training and a "data driven conspiracy theorist" (probably a good term to describe a real-time historian in fact).
I couldn't make head nor tail of what was coming from the alt-media. It was only when I listened to Dr. Yeadon (another person who did the right thing) that I heard a cohesive counter-argument that made sense. I've had the pleasure of thanking Dr. Yeadon in person on Substack and other platforms over the last two years and I'm eternally grateful to him for what he did.
As to your other point, the people in power are dangerous psychopaths and sociopaths. My brother hates conspiracy theories and I tend to tread carefully, because his wife is an establishment normie. She's a leader in her profession but in real terms, I could absolutely demolish her entire belief structure if I wanted to. She's a perfect example of an "expert" who doesn't actually have any expertise.
Don't get me wrong, she's ignorant rather than evil, but she is exactly the sort of person that TPTB depend on for their power. Educated, PhD, MSM darling.
But even my brother in a recent discussion pointed out that maybe the people who govern us do so because they are sociopaths and want power over other people. NGL I was impressed when he said that (I class him as an "ostrich" by the way - someone who is smart enough to work this out but is too cowardly to do so, most intelligent people fall into this category, sadly, they don't want to think about it too much because the repercussions are too frightening).
The point is, you don't have to be evil to support the power. I doubt she has heard of a single conspiracy theory in her life, short of the intelligent questions I have asked her as an "expert" in her field.
The "power" these people "in charge" have is insidious and is entirely self-appointed. The problem is that most people who are chasing material gains will go with the flow and be completely ignorant (intentionally or unintentionally) of anything outside of what is presented as "the correct way to think". This weakness of thought only strengthens their power.
I'm not religious (I lean more towards Buddhism, which is more of a philosophy/spiritual path than a religion) but what I have just described sounds an awful lot like what Satan would do.
"You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, emerald, and carbuncle; and crafted in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared."
How does the Angel of Light become the Angel of Darkness? That's one of the topics I'm exploring in my series, "The Devil Incarnate":
There are certainly demons involved, but not in the way Karen imagines. I don't know what expertise she has to analyze anything, but apparently it's not in AI or telecommunications, or biotechnology. Those who dislike the current state of our oppressions should take a more rational approach. Her word salad of current paranoid fantasies is pretty comprehensive but entirely unrelated. To summarize her statements, it seems she believes someone is trying to kill us. Doesn't say who, or why, or how. Solving any crime requires understanding those things. Detectives look for means, motives and opportunity to identify criminals. We don't have that. We haven't even defined a crime yet.
We should start by determining that people have been harmed by the vax. That hasn't been proven. Lots of circumstantial evidence, but nothing that would support a criminal complaint, or even civil action. Start there. What, exactly, happened?
Then look for what caused the harm. If it can be shown the vax caused it, then was it from incompetence or malice? No malice has been proven, so incompetence seems more likely. Negligence can also be cause for homicide charges, but hasn't been proven.
Why would anyone want to "kill humanity?" That's irrational. Murderous cabals always have a purpose, unless they're just psychopaths, which is rare. And psychopaths never have the means to accomplish their crimes on the scale we've seen.
Who would want to kill humanity? What would they gain? Who has the power or influence to pull it off? No one comes to mind. Feckless billionaires might be able to pull it together but not without being detected.
Our situation is best explained by mass formation as described by Desmet, a herd hysteria incited by a panic over a mysterious pathogen. The reactions have been overreaction, just as much by the adherents of the superstitious acceptance of injections, isolation and masks as by the paranoid delusions that resist it.
We should stick to evidence, and pursue it vigorously. But those who imagine some sinister man behind the curtain orchestrating it all don't understand what they observe.
Doesn't matter what proof we need. Thenecessary proof convinces the public. They're not yet convinced. If you want to change things, you'll need to convince a lot more people. I'm already convinced, but i know that's not enough.
Yes, I pay attention pretty closely. But knowing you're right doesn't change anything. You have to convince others. A lot of others. Outrage and hysterical screeds don't help. Counterproductive, actually.
Knowing I’m right is enough for me. There is more than enough evidence on the www, much more comprehensive than anything I could say. Also I don’t think anyone here is remotely hysterical, perhaps just a bit frustrated by truth denialists.
That's complacency. For those who want to stop the abuse, and punish the abusers, internalized confidence is irrelevant. You're part of the solution, or part of the problem.
If you go to his substack you will see he only has the ability to look at things in a certain context and to his credit, his work seems good in that specific context. Also credit to him for not grifting the substack comments section. However he clearly doesn't realize that many of the narcissistic elements of the syndicate openly admit to the crimes. He knows nothing about color revolutions, the history of Bayer, what happened to Nazi officials after WW2, or what Sadhguru is saying at COP26. Nor is he asking any of those questions about all of this publicly available information. But as the saying goes, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Thank you for reviewing my substack. It's not intended to convince anyone of anything, just an account of what I have done to improve my own health. But, as a former cop, I'm pretty familiar with crimes, and the evidence necessary to convict. As with every other aspect of living in civilization, wishing everyone saw things as you do seldom works.
Funny you should say that. Perhaps you are "former" because evidence just wasn't your thing. You can try to make this about "what I think" all you want but the fact remains that these people have and continue to openly confess. Just because you don't want to see or don't know where to look doesn't make it less true. But again, continue to shoot the messenger. Perhaps you should have started with attacking the evidence but instead you just produce feeling-induced word salad. If you have an argument, present your facts.
My argument is you haven't presented your argument effects timely. If you have a slam dunk case, present it, and the world will agree. You don't, so they won't. And attacking those who agree with you is neurotically ineffective. Happens all the time with criminals -- they have no honor, only emotion.
There is another answer to these important questions, but it's contingent upon the recognition that different structures of beings exist (e.g. gestalt-entities like ant colonies, bee hives, slime molds, etc.), which is a rational proposition derived from observation and inference. It is somewhat on the order of Desmet's theories, but accounts for the missing ingredient of purely destructive motives.
Gates is irrelevant. He has no power over me, probably not you, unless you allow it. I don't. Our problem isn't little Bill or any other self styled king of the world, it's entirely elected officials and their assemblies of police and bureaucrat enforcers. Deal with them.
Lots of people want to control us. Human nature. Whether we allow it or not is a choice. If you don't want to be manipulated by gates, dont be. Its entirely up to you.
God-consciousness is the only way out.
But you responded to this article with pure emotion. Not only that, you keep trying to say I have an argument to make. What argument is that, exactly? You can think whatever you want about the various pieces of evidence but the fact that you won't even address that simple point of just allowing yourself to examine the stuff. Nobody really cares what you think anyways, nor what I think. Engage the evidence yourself. Stop ducking and dodging and moving goal posts. How you manage to turn this into another question is beyond me. You say you were a cop but I would say community police are more concerned with truth and try to use discretion wisely. Jackboots are servants to the state and don't engage evidence because discretion doesn't serve your ego or your paycheck. Now the question becomes what sort of cop were you because you certainly haven't gotten to the bottom of anything but you sure can punch down. I guess everyone gotta earn a paycheck...
I love a Strong Intellaget Beautiful Women. God Bless your honest caring soul always.....
GOD bless your dedication to being a TRUTH Warrior. I thank you deeply. This is Spiritual warfare - our GOD is the wind beneath your wings. We can't lose with GOD on our side ...
The enemies of freedom and liberty have clearly PLANNED this PLANdemic out to a great degree or detail.
1. Chinese lockdowns have given the Chicom Government cover to liquidate freedom loving protesters
2. American lockdowns have enabled our Communists to seize power from the people. We may NEVER get it back unless we fight spiritually and physically.
3. Conservatives tend to be small business owners. These people have been decimated by never ending lockdowns while Global Corporations thrive.
4. Forced vaccines will reveal those loyal to Socialist Governments, and those not.
5. Vaccines render everyone dependent on Government due to immunopathology
6. Vaccine induced ADE will be concealed by never ending “variants” and blamed on unvaccinated.
7. The LYING MARIXIST media, big tech, deep state, and medical establishment will make this unquestionable, censoring all whistleblowers
8. Boosters will give the appearance of fighting variants, when the reality is that it masks, or even furthers ADE making people more dependent on Government
9. The elderly will be decimated by the Clot Shots
10. Unvaccinated will be made scapegoats and pariahs.
Thank you very much for that you do Lioness. God bless you.
Everything is Biology. It's not Biology merged with Technology. It's just that the "Tech" is anti-biological to so many. The question I grapple with is, is all social disruption and violence intentional? Are we ruled by psychopathic parasites who have captured Finance and Science? Do they lust to feed on the light of GOD which shines within each one of us?
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
The "Epicurean Paradox" tells us much about how these people think. Either they want to make God look weak and impotent or they want to trick him into action (there's a lot of evidence that suggests these people actually are trying to do this, although it's all over the place in fragments so I can't "send you a link").
Ultimately they want to become Gods themselves, and I think there is plenty of evidence of that as their ultimate goal via transhumanism.
And that last sentence prove how stupid and delusional they are.
The paradox seems like it could be reformulated this way:
"If God is such a loving dad, why doesn't He come down to the schoolyard and kick my bullies in the teeth."
In this sense, it isn't a "paradox" at all, but rather the reflexive frustration and naivete of childish minds. God wants us to grow up.
Your comment reminded me of this:
"A man was trapped in his house during a flood. He began praying to God to rescue him. He had a vision in his head of God’s hand reaching down from heaven and lifting him to safety. The water started to rise in his house. His neighbour urged him to leave and offered him a ride to safety. The man yelled back, “I am waiting for God to save me.” The neighbour drove off in his pick-up truck.
The man continued to pray and hold on to his vision. As the water began rising in his house, he had to climb up to the roof. A boat came by with some people heading for safe ground. They yelled at the man to grab a rope they were ready to throw and take him to safety. He told them that he was waiting for God to save him. They shook their heads and moved on.
The man continued to pray, believing with all his heart that he would be saved by God. The flood waters continued to rise. A helicopter flew by and a voice came over a loudspeaker offering to lower a ladder and take him off the roof. The man waved the helicopter away, shouting back that he was waiting for God to save him. The helicopter left. The flooding water came over the roof and caught him up and swept him away. He drowned.
When he reached heaven and asked, “God, why did you not save me? I believed in you with all my heart. Why did you let me drown?” God replied, “I sent you a pick-up truck, a boat and a helicopter and you refused all of them. What else could I possibly do for you?”"
LOL, yes I know (and love) that one as well.
I guess I just meant that there's something about the way certain people approach the idea of power that's childishly simplistic, while pretending it's the result of deep thought and experience. The meaning I get from the flood story isn't so much that God directly sent rescuers, but that He equipped us with the ability to recognize the ways to get out of trouble.
Yes, I agree. And (maybe) people like Steve Kirsch, the owners of Substack and even people like myself (I started warning everyone I knew about these vaxxes in early 2021 and spent probably 80 hours a week on 4Chan and twitter sharing my research, I guess I saved at least a few hundred thousand people from them). Is that impulse to do the right thing "God working through you" or just doing what you believe to be the right thing?
I don't know.
Unfortunately, something like Covid was a complete headf**k. I knew that it was all a scam, but I'm a historian by training and a "data driven conspiracy theorist" (probably a good term to describe a real-time historian in fact).
I couldn't make head nor tail of what was coming from the alt-media. It was only when I listened to Dr. Yeadon (another person who did the right thing) that I heard a cohesive counter-argument that made sense. I've had the pleasure of thanking Dr. Yeadon in person on Substack and other platforms over the last two years and I'm eternally grateful to him for what he did.
As to your other point, the people in power are dangerous psychopaths and sociopaths. My brother hates conspiracy theories and I tend to tread carefully, because his wife is an establishment normie. She's a leader in her profession but in real terms, I could absolutely demolish her entire belief structure if I wanted to. She's a perfect example of an "expert" who doesn't actually have any expertise.
Don't get me wrong, she's ignorant rather than evil, but she is exactly the sort of person that TPTB depend on for their power. Educated, PhD, MSM darling.
But even my brother in a recent discussion pointed out that maybe the people who govern us do so because they are sociopaths and want power over other people. NGL I was impressed when he said that (I class him as an "ostrich" by the way - someone who is smart enough to work this out but is too cowardly to do so, most intelligent people fall into this category, sadly, they don't want to think about it too much because the repercussions are too frightening).
The point is, you don't have to be evil to support the power. I doubt she has heard of a single conspiracy theory in her life, short of the intelligent questions I have asked her as an "expert" in her field.
The "power" these people "in charge" have is insidious and is entirely self-appointed. The problem is that most people who are chasing material gains will go with the flow and be completely ignorant (intentionally or unintentionally) of anything outside of what is presented as "the correct way to think". This weakness of thought only strengthens their power.
I'm not religious (I lean more towards Buddhism, which is more of a philosophy/spiritual path than a religion) but what I have just described sounds an awful lot like what Satan would do.
(From Ezekiel 28)
"You were the signet of perfection, full of wisdom and perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, and diamond, beryl, onyx, and jasper, sapphire, emerald, and carbuncle; and crafted in gold were your settings and your engravings. On the day that you were created they were prepared."
How does the Angel of Light become the Angel of Darkness? That's one of the topics I'm exploring in my series, "The Devil Incarnate":
https://markbisone.substack.com/p/the-devil-incarnate-part-2
I hope you or Ms. Kingston can read and offer feedback at some point. I think I've stumbled upon some useful tools with which to fight back.
Thanks for your dedicated coverage of this war. I believe we will win in the end.
God bless
There are certainly demons involved, but not in the way Karen imagines. I don't know what expertise she has to analyze anything, but apparently it's not in AI or telecommunications, or biotechnology. Those who dislike the current state of our oppressions should take a more rational approach. Her word salad of current paranoid fantasies is pretty comprehensive but entirely unrelated. To summarize her statements, it seems she believes someone is trying to kill us. Doesn't say who, or why, or how. Solving any crime requires understanding those things. Detectives look for means, motives and opportunity to identify criminals. We don't have that. We haven't even defined a crime yet.
We should start by determining that people have been harmed by the vax. That hasn't been proven. Lots of circumstantial evidence, but nothing that would support a criminal complaint, or even civil action. Start there. What, exactly, happened?
Then look for what caused the harm. If it can be shown the vax caused it, then was it from incompetence or malice? No malice has been proven, so incompetence seems more likely. Negligence can also be cause for homicide charges, but hasn't been proven.
Why would anyone want to "kill humanity?" That's irrational. Murderous cabals always have a purpose, unless they're just psychopaths, which is rare. And psychopaths never have the means to accomplish their crimes on the scale we've seen.
Who would want to kill humanity? What would they gain? Who has the power or influence to pull it off? No one comes to mind. Feckless billionaires might be able to pull it together but not without being detected.
Our situation is best explained by mass formation as described by Desmet, a herd hysteria incited by a panic over a mysterious pathogen. The reactions have been overreaction, just as much by the adherents of the superstitious acceptance of injections, isolation and masks as by the paranoid delusions that resist it.
We should stick to evidence, and pursue it vigorously. But those who imagine some sinister man behind the curtain orchestrating it all don't understand what they observe.
Many were killed by the jab. And many are disabled from it. Experienced these truths. At my former job. That is all.
Then you should be able to prove it, and convince others.
I have, thanks.
Apparently not. They're still being used.
I'm sorry, I totally disagree with you. What more proof do you need that
people have been harm and even died? And yes, we have defined the crime.
And Karen Kingston is not Colombo. MF can explain the mechanism of implementation but not what's at the inception of the catastrophe.
Patents data doesn't lie and may be the only one true and reliable source.
Doesn't matter what proof we need. Thenecessary proof convinces the public. They're not yet convinced. If you want to change things, you'll need to convince a lot more people. I'm already convinced, but i know that's not enough.
Have you been paying attention at all?
https://leohohmann.com/2022/05/26/globalists-have-entered-the-kill-phase-of-great-reset-remember-the-deagel-population-forecast-it-now-makes-total-sense/
Yes, I pay attention pretty closely. But knowing you're right doesn't change anything. You have to convince others. A lot of others. Outrage and hysterical screeds don't help. Counterproductive, actually.
Knowing I’m right is enough for me. There is more than enough evidence on the www, much more comprehensive than anything I could say. Also I don’t think anyone here is remotely hysterical, perhaps just a bit frustrated by truth denialists.
That's complacency. For those who want to stop the abuse, and punish the abusers, internalized confidence is irrelevant. You're part of the solution, or part of the problem.
Okie dokie
If you go to his substack you will see he only has the ability to look at things in a certain context and to his credit, his work seems good in that specific context. Also credit to him for not grifting the substack comments section. However he clearly doesn't realize that many of the narcissistic elements of the syndicate openly admit to the crimes. He knows nothing about color revolutions, the history of Bayer, what happened to Nazi officials after WW2, or what Sadhguru is saying at COP26. Nor is he asking any of those questions about all of this publicly available information. But as the saying goes, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
Thank you for reviewing my substack. It's not intended to convince anyone of anything, just an account of what I have done to improve my own health. But, as a former cop, I'm pretty familiar with crimes, and the evidence necessary to convict. As with every other aspect of living in civilization, wishing everyone saw things as you do seldom works.
Funny you should say that. Perhaps you are "former" because evidence just wasn't your thing. You can try to make this about "what I think" all you want but the fact remains that these people have and continue to openly confess. Just because you don't want to see or don't know where to look doesn't make it less true. But again, continue to shoot the messenger. Perhaps you should have started with attacking the evidence but instead you just produce feeling-induced word salad. If you have an argument, present your facts.
My argument is you haven't presented your argument effects timely. If you have a slam dunk case, present it, and the world will agree. You don't, so they won't. And attacking those who agree with you is neurotically ineffective. Happens all the time with criminals -- they have no honor, only emotion.
There is another answer to these important questions, but it's contingent upon the recognition that different structures of beings exist (e.g. gestalt-entities like ant colonies, bee hives, slime molds, etc.), which is a rational proposition derived from observation and inference. It is somewhat on the order of Desmet's theories, but accounts for the missing ingredient of purely destructive motives.
https://markbisone.substack.com/p/the-devil-incarnate-part-1
Interesting dissertation. I subscribed so I'll remember to read more when I have time.
Gates is irrelevant. He has no power over me, probably not you, unless you allow it. I don't. Our problem isn't little Bill or any other self styled king of the world, it's entirely elected officials and their assemblies of police and bureaucrat enforcers. Deal with them.
Lots of people want to control us. Human nature. Whether we allow it or not is a choice. If you don't want to be manipulated by gates, dont be. Its entirely up to you.
Crazy that this is possibly how world depopulation will take place; or perhaps nuclear war will cover up the demonic Big Lie?
Thanks for sharing. Great interview.
You are so wrong.
You should explain. I didn’t see anything incorrect.