If there had been such concensus as he claims, then why didn't the Senate vote to ratify his decision? Instead he canceled it because he DIDN'T have their support. The answers immediately before that regarding whether there was any other option that could have persuaded him NOT to invoke the …
If there had been such concensus as he claims, then why didn't the Senate vote to ratify his decision? Instead he canceled it because he DIDN'T have their support. The answers immediately before that regarding whether there was any other option that could have persuaded him NOT to invoke the emergencies act certainly doesn't seem consistent with the senate's stance to NOT support it.
And some of his answers in switching to french seems to be to avoid most people from paying attention or being aware of what he's saying.
The last question and his response is a lie.
If there had been such concensus as he claims, then why didn't the Senate vote to ratify his decision? Instead he canceled it because he DIDN'T have their support. The answers immediately before that regarding whether there was any other option that could have persuaded him NOT to invoke the emergencies act certainly doesn't seem consistent with the senate's stance to NOT support it.
And some of his answers in switching to french seems to be to avoid most people from paying attention or being aware of what he's saying.