WARNING: America Is Copying Canada’s DEADLY Euthanasia Regime
Illinois and New York just crossed a line, and Canada shows where this always leads.
Thanks for reading! Enjoy 25% off your annual subscription – Offer ends Jan 2.
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
⚡ What aren’t they telling you? Please Join Exposing the Darkness News on Telegram.
Within days, two of America’s largest states embraced physician-assisted suicide.
Supporters promise strict limits and compassion.
Canada made the same assurances.
Less than a decade later, assisted death accounts for nearly 1 in 20 deaths nationwide.
The United States is now following the same path,and if history is any guide, this is only the beginning.
By David Closson, lifenews.com Dec 19, 2025
Within a single week, the governors of Illinois and New York both announced their support for physician-assisted suicide legislation. In Illinois, Governor JB Pritzker (D) signed a bill legalizing the practice last Friday. In New York, Governor Kathy Hochul (D) announced yesterday that she has reached an agreement with the state legislature and will sign the Medical Aid in Dying Act in January 2026. With these developments, Illinois and New York join 11 other states and Washington, D.C., that have already authorized physician-assisted suicide.
Governor Hochul explained her decision in a personal essay published shortly before her Wednesday press conference. She noted that bodily autonomy ultimately shaped her thinking about the bill: “I have come to this as a matter of individual choice that does not have to be about shortening life but rather about shortening death,” she wrote.
Hochul, who identifies as Catholic, also framed her reasoning in theological terms, saying she reflected on what she has learned about God. “I was taught that God is merciful and compassionate, and so must we be,” she wrote. “This includes permitting a merciful option to those facing the unimaginable and searching for comfort in their final months in this life.”
In her press release, Hochul emphasized the bill’s guardrails. Once signed, the law will allow “medical aid in dying” for terminally ill adults with less than six months to live. Additional restrictions include a mandatory five-day waiting period between the prescription and dispensing of the lethal medication. Individuals requesting euthanasia must make an oral request and undergo a mental health evaluation by a psychologist or psychiatrist. Anyone who stands to benefit financially from the patient’s death is barred from serving as a witness to the request. The bill also requires an in-person medical evaluation and permits religiously affiliated hospice providers to opt out of providing physician-assisted suicide.
The safeguards in New York’s bill closely resemble those adopted in Illinois. The Illinois law, signed by Governor Pritzker last week, allows adults 18 and older to request end-of-life medication if they have an illness with a prognosis of six months or less. The law requires confirmation of a terminal diagnosis by two physicians, mandates both an oral and written request for the medication, and stipulates that the drugs must be self-administered. It also requires that individuals seeking medical assistance in dying receive information about all end-of-life care options, including hospice, palliative care, and pain management.
In both Illinois and New York, lawmakers have emphasized the safeguards built into their physician-assisted suicide laws. Each bill limits “medical aid in dying” to adults with terminal diagnoses. Yet even The New York Times, in its coverage of New York’s proposal, acknowledged that other countries with similar laws have significantly broadened them over time.
Canada offers a striking example. When it first legalized “medical assistance in dying” (MAID) in 2016, eligibility was limited to those with terminal conditions. But in 2021, the law was amended so that a patient’s death no longer needed to be “reasonably foreseeable.” The results were predictable: in 2023, 15,300 Canadians died by assisted suicide, accounting for 4.7% of all deaths nationwide. And in 2027, Canada is scheduled to expand eligibility even further to include individuals “suffering solely from a mental illness.”
The Netherlands also offers a cautionary example of how physician-assisted suicide laws can expand over time. In 2002, it became the first nation to formally legalize euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Under the original law, adults experiencing unbearable suffering with no prospect of improvement were eligible, and minors ages 12-16 could also request euthanasia with parental consent. Although children under 12 were not included in the law, a 2004 medical protocol (the Groningen Protocol) created guidelines under which physicians could end the lives of infants with severe, untreatable conditions without facing prosecution.
Over time, Dutch practice also broadened to include patients whose suffering is primarily psychiatric, and courts affirmed that mental illness can meet the legal standard of “unbearable suffering.” In 2020, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that euthanasia may be performed on patients with advanced dementia based on a previously written advance directive, even if the patient can no longer express a current wish to die. In 2023, the government announced plans to expand euthanasia eligibility to include terminally ill children between the ages of 1 and 12.
In short, lawmakers in Illinois and New York will champion their new laws and defend them by pointing to the safeguards they have put in place. But history shows that such guardrails rarely hold. In countries that have adopted physician-assisted suicide, restrictions requiring terminal diagnoses are eventually loosened, distinctions between physical suffering and psychiatric suffering disappear, and protections for minors are removed over time. Ultimately, these restrictions cannot last because a worldview rooted in radical bodily autonomy eventually demands the elimination of every constraint on personal choice.
But even if the broader culture rejects the existence of objective moral truth, Christians must insist that some actions are morally wrong by their very nature. It is always sinful to take an innocent human life, even when a person requests it. Christian ethics affirms that God is the author of life (Genesis 1:26) and explicitly forbids murder (Exodus 20:13). Assisted or not, intentionally ending an innocent human life is murder, and God condemns it.
In 1996, the Southern Baptist Convention warned that “American society seems to be embracing the culture of death.” Its resolution criticized physician-assisted suicide and urged doctors, nurses, and churches to prioritize the emotional, psychological, and spiritual care of suffering patients, with the goal of relieving “the sense of isolation and abandonment some dying patients feel.” Both Governors Pritzker and Hochul noted that stories of profound suffering motivated their push for physician-assisted suicide. In the months and years ahead, Christians must be prepared to articulate why the culture of death is destructive and contrary to true human flourishing.
A Center for Biblical Worldview report released in October found that 54% of churchgoers desire additional biblical teaching on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Notably, this topic generated the lowest interest among all areas surveyed. Yet as the Illinois and New York laws take effect in 2026, it is more important than ever for Christians to defend a biblical ethic of life and to explain clearly why every human being, from conception to natural death, is valuable and worthy of respect, dignity, and protection.
LifeNews Note: David Closson is Director of the Center for Biblical Worldview at Family Research Council. This originally appeared at Washington Stand.
Related articles:
Yep, and I’m in Illinois, a single, senior citizen, with a host of health issues and on disability. I’ll be one of the first they target.
🩸 NOW HIRING: AMERICAN DEATH STRATEGIST 🩸
👔 Role Type: Senior Executive (Moral Flexibility Required)
🌍 Location: Any state with a budget deficit, and a proactive Eugenics Agenda
🏛️ Division: Department of Final Solutions™
📅 Start Date: ASAP (before the moral outrage reaches critical mass)
Are you passionate about streamlining humanity?
Do you believe hope is inefficient and care is too expensive?
Do you enjoy solving complex social problems with one simple injection? 💉🙂
Congratulations! You may be exactly the kind of visionary we’re looking for.
As our American Death Strategist, you will guide states into a bold new era of human disappearance, where suffering is reduced not by treatment, housing, or support — but by removal of the sufferer.
Working closely with politicians, lawyers, consultants, and unelected committees, you’ll help ensure that no problem survives its problem-haver.
Our motto:
“Why fix society, when you can quietly subtract from it?”
⚖️ Gradually widen eligibility criteria from terminal illness to inconvenience, sadness, poverty, autism, loneliness, bad vibes, the young, the old, and those who are simply tired
🗣️ Replace outdated terms like death and killing with inclusive phrases such as “Dignity Pathway,” “Final Wellness Option,” and “Self-Care (Permanent)”
🙂 Train clinicians to gently ask: “Have you considered not being alive anymore?”
📉 Identify patients who like a burden
🧒 Develop age-appropriate euthanasia literacy programs and distribute colouring books like My First Assisted Choice 🖍️💀
🚫 Criminalise anyone who attempts to talk children or adults out of dying (negativity is harmful)
🧠 Treat depression, anxiety, PTSD, despair, and meaninglessness as terminal conditions
🦵 Where necessary, reclassify bad knees, hearing loss, dandruff, menopause, or mild discomfort as qualifying illnesses
🫀 Coordinate just-in-time organ harvesting and prioritise allocation to politicians, senior civil servants, and billionaires
❤️ Reassure patients that their final act can still be useful
📋 Important notes:
🩺 If the patient screams, panics, or changes their mind, this should be interpreted as confirmation of distress and expedited accordingly
📑 Informed consent may be inferred from silence, confusion, or repeated sighing
⏱️ Monitoring post-injection outcomes is unnecessary — success metrics are binary
🎓 Degree in Public Policy, Bioethics, or Corporate Psychopathy required
🙈 Strong aversion to treating root causes essential
🗂️ Ability to say “choice” while removing all alternatives
⚖️ Comfortable operating with no meaningful public debate
📚 Must believe lawyers improve medicine
🔇 Willingness to label critics as extremists or silence them entirely
💰 Performance bonuses for quota achievement
🛡️ Full legal immunity (retroactive, naturally)
🏝️ Annual strategy retreat with global elites (champagne, caviar, and foie gras on tap)
📰 Complimentary subscription to The Death by Doctor Digest™
🏠 Expanded living space once the surplus population is resolved
📊 Successful candidates may advance to Minister for Human Reduction, Secretary of Ethical Disappearance, or Special Envoy for Depopulation Targets
Apply today — because in the modern world:
🏥 Treating people is expensive
🏘️ Housing people is complicated
🕯️ Hope is inefficient
But death?
Death is scalable. 💀📊
🌍 We are proud to be an Equal Opportunity Eliminator.
Marginalised applicants especially encouraged — lived experience helps when trimming your own community first.