42 Comments
User's avatar
Rosalee's avatar

Indeed

IF it is possible, donate before surgery, which will require a transfusion

Even when there is a 'match' there can STILL be problems

Mom had trouble when she had neurosurgery and needed transfusion and this

was decades ago.

However, and I know some may think me paranoid for asking,

how can we be assured, even if we donate our own

that we will in fact receive OUR donation?

They were so deceptive during COVID and even now. . .

Expand full comment
Rae's avatar

That is a completely valid concern.

The Hippocratic Oath has gone out the window. We need to require all clinics, hospitals, offices, and healthcare providers to post on their window that they get financial kickbacks for pushing vaccines or any "product"of pharma. We deserve to know who they are accountable to since very few medical professionals are still working for their patients.

Expand full comment
Truthseeker's avatar

safeblood.net

They have memberships for safe blood donations and recipients. They do test for the spike protein before allowing donors.

It's the only one I know of at this time...a worldwide operation.

I'm treating newer clients who had blood transfusions in the last 4 years, and now test positive for spike antibodies (igG4 tests), and high numbers on the D-dimer tests ( micro-clots). Some showed heart damage, with Troponin T tests, though they have no symptoms yet.

Don't think they will give you saved blood, or a family member's blood. It's a first come, first served basis, and you will never know whose blood you got. People are paying a high price for unvaxxed blood, so it's very lucrative for the hospital to sell your unvaxxed blood to the highest bidder.

Expand full comment
denise ward's avatar

Have you heard that the navy used to do surgeries in the war using salt water? I have also heard that coconut water can be used instead of blood.

Expand full comment
RESONANCE Collective's avatar

I've told my family I won't be sent to hospital if there is a chance I will be poisoned in this way. A friend's mum, a Jehovah's Witness, recently had a big op without receiving blood, so it IS possible but it needed prior arrangement :-/

Expand full comment
denise ward's avatar

I have a friend who had hip surgery and never took blood, nor pain killers.

Expand full comment
RESONANCE Collective's avatar

Oh wow, that’s brilliant! <3

Expand full comment
denise ward's avatar

Yes, he's extremely fearless. He actually does podcasts and has been for a long time. He understands the system well.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

The doc is the one who decides if they will proceed with the surgery without the blood donation in an emergency NOT being signed...something you gotta talk to the doctor about before the surgery. I did it before a hip surgery and they were understanding and OK with the fact I didn't want vaxxed blood.

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

Yes, what is primarily needed in the case of extreme blood loss is a volume expander. Saline solution has been used for this purpose for many decades. This gives the body time to rebuild its own blood supply.

Expand full comment
Paul Frohlich's avatar

Ignorance , stupidity do not pay, those who believed the media , too bad. Its survival of the fittests.

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

Cleans up the gene pool

Expand full comment
Paul Frohlich's avatar

Yes. Works on all species.

Expand full comment
Sophie Bertrand's avatar

I have a friend who did not accept the injected poison. We're only 10% left in Canada cov19 unvaxxed apparently. Unfortunaley she had an emergency and had to undergo 2 blood transfusions. She prays she will be okay from the contaminated blood. I don't think hospitals would be very cooperative to accept blood from a selected unvaxxed doner by the patient. It's a huge problem (to be contaminated with this blood). Maybe one day the blood of unvaxxed people will be the next gold rush...

Expand full comment
jsinton's avatar

I realized the implications years ago of mixing blood, and actively sought out an answer from the Red Cross before anyone seems to have thought about it. They thought I was crazy.

Expand full comment
Rosemarie Weleski's avatar

The Red Cross is the last placee I would think to ask anything. They are a part of the globalist cabal.....hardly any of the money collected actually goes to help people. Most goes to the people behind the desk, if you know what I mean. Never donate to them.

Expand full comment
Nicole Boucher's avatar

I’m not a Jehovah’s witness who refuse blood transfusions as part of their religion they sure know a thing or 2. If I go into the hospital I will claim to be JW just to be able to refuse the transfusions. they have to respect your religion hahahahaha

Expand full comment
Sophie Bertrand's avatar

They're in complete denial. They don't consider vaccinated blood to be "contaminated" to start with. You remember the story of a baby who needed a transfusion, and all plans had been done to select blood from an unvaxxed doner? the hospital went ahead with the procedure but did not take the selected doner's blood (tell me it's not on purpose, they had access to it). The baby, early on after the transfusion, developped clots like crazy and they could not save the little boy.

Expand full comment
Nicole Boucher's avatar

The case following they did use unvaxxed blood so no one would look into it but all the blood is tainted. But so is medication with graphene oxide it’s in our food too. They put nanotechnology in injections even in insulin it’s sick you have to go back to nature find God and live a clean life

Expand full comment
Sophie Bertrand's avatar

Yep Nicole, "they" made sure it's everywhere. You can't even take your dentist's anesthetic, 'can't find a romantic partner fi you're single, fast food suppliers have slipped microscopic graphene strands in the food. All the water supply is pretty contaminated too. I live in Montreal, city water. I wonder how much home filters can get rid of stuff. Indeed, God help us with this whole mess.

Expand full comment
denise ward's avatar

Thank you Dr Ben Marble. Maybe that is why unvaccinated people are showing up with spike proteins and things.

Expand full comment
Freedom's avatar

The "retards in charge" ARE in hell... unfortunately we're stuck there too, with them.

The real question is: How to turn this hell into a paradise.

Just gotta outlive them all I guess.

I thought they'd have turned the 6G towers on by now and crashed all these zombies.

Hell goes on.

Expand full comment
Nicole Boucher's avatar

just don’t get any transfusions

Expand full comment
Christopher Castagnoli's avatar

Why is Bill Gates not facing any consequences for the murder and mayhem he and his buddies have caused? How many more millions dead and injured will it take to put a stop to all this mRNA insanity???

Expand full comment
Rosemarie Weleski's avatar

You called it correctly....insanity!!

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

Wealth buys freedom from consequences in this world.

Expand full comment
jsinton's avatar

People, people, people.

What no one seems to realize is that the vaxxed are just AHEAD of the unvaxxed as far as overall contamination. Everything IS contaminated, or I should say I have yet to test anything which wasn't. You name it, I probably had a look. I do not believe anything has escaped, unless it's on a secret base on the dark side of the moon.

Expand full comment
Jane's avatar

Thank you for standing up- retired GP

Expand full comment
sandy's avatar

Dr Ben Marble has been an outspoken hero since the earliest days of COVID. I am sure Sisi Wiles would have recommended against him as surgeon general.

Expand full comment
Rick Foster's avatar

What about Shedding..as I read it, pretty much Everyone ended up being vaxxed due to shedding

Expand full comment
John1200's avatar

Yes, it looks like everyone has been exposed to the spike protein, but do the particles that are shed contain ALL of the components contained in the vaccine? The graphene, the nano electronics, the toxic metals?

Expand full comment
Rick Foster's avatar

Yes..Those are the questions..I don't know the answers. It is understood that "shed happens" (see what I did there?,), but I've read Nothing on the implications..

Expand full comment
David Rinker's avatar

There are many advantages of bloodless surgery. One option is Englewood Bloodless Surgery Ctr. Englewood NJ. englewoodhealth.org Like big pharma, the blood vampire business is not about the health of patients, but bucks, from the dregs who sell their blood, to the blood banks, to the hospitals.

Expand full comment
Rosemarie Weleski's avatar

Yes....I agree!!! It really is a shame that this was never considered. The unvaxxed will not stand a chance in an emergency situation and will need to keep a stash of their own blood on hand, I guess??? Or, use the fake blood that, I believe, Japan has made??

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

If you know you are having surgery, pre donate. I signed a form refusing blood transfusions because I do not want vaxxed blood...another option is having an unvaxxed friend/relative who is a universal donor help you out.

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

I thought everyone's blood is "contaminated" now. V or no V.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

I guess I could be contaminated from shedding, but I'm not having the problems my vaxxed friends and coworkers are having (blood clots, vision changes, kidney failure, hypertension).

Expand full comment
Kat Bro's avatar

How about organ donation? Pretty much a death sentence donation now.

Expand full comment
Kim's avatar
Jun 16Edited

Good for Dr. Ben Marple for saying it!!

People also need to reject the dental anesthetics too, as well as, most anything else that comes from a needle because we just can't know for sure that the mRNA ISN'T IN THERE.

Expand full comment