Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jjule's avatar

I really enjoy your writing.

Thank you.

Reiner never said it was a lawsuit, it was to show how to conduct a grand jury trial. How we the people can do it.

How much evidence there is.

I too thought it was a Nuremberg 2.

But later found my error listening to him.

He corrected the rumor numerous times.

He said no judge in Germany would take the case.

Perhaps a few in the US.

That’s why it has to be a grand jury.

☮️

Kim's avatar

Initially, I thought Fuellmich might be controlled opposition - he was reminiscent of the people who convinced others not to worry about the fraud in the 2020 election, that it was all being handled behind the scenes. This encouraged people to sit back and do nothing.

But, if you had listened to what Fuellmich stated, repeatedly, was his effort was NOT a Nuremberg 2.0 - although it quickly came to be labeled that despite his protestations. You'd also understand he finally came to the conclusion there was no way forward in the courts - they were compromised. This is the same conclusion those who felt there was fraud in the 2020 election eventually came to despite some continuing to pursue the courts.

Fuellmich concluded the only way to win was to get public opinion to see the covid pandemic as a scam and a crime against humanity. Once you reach a tipping point where everyone simply doesn't believe in jabs, masks, mandates, the government's mouthpieces, then you have a chance to get out of this nightmare. Fuellmich and his "team" seem to be committed to the effort of changing minds. I doubt he's better off doing this than he would be continuing his normal law practice.

There are so many villains in this saga, it's sad to see you focus on low hanging, underfunded fruit.

50 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?