Pfizer Data Fraud? The Pfizer Documents Show Major Anomalies in Clinical Trial Enrollment Data
Investigation by Jikkyleaks
Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.
Surprise, surprise. Apparently, the entire Pfizer trial was faked.
Will the fraud investigation be launched by the authorities?
Steve Kirsch: “ The Pfizer documents just released show evidence of clinical trial enrollment at one site that appears to be impossibly fast. Is it fraud or just brilliant execution? We need more information. If it is fraud, it means Pfizer is liable for all the deaths and disabilities caused by their drug.”
I made a copy of Jikkyleaks thread, in case the account gets suspended by Twitter
“Weekend recruitment for a clinical trial would be odd. Staff is needed to fill out that many record forms (CRFs) and there are potential risks to the trial, so you need medical staff. It would be highly unusual. So who is he? Here is his trial CV”
“Yet while doing all this, he managed to find time to (presumably single-handedly because no other authors are listed at that site) recruit 4500 patients in 3 weeks, with each patient requiring 250 PAGES of case report forms (CRFs). That is 1,125,000 pages of CRFs. In 3 weeks.”
“ There were 270 clinical recruitment sites for the Pflzer vaccine study, numbered consecutively from 1001 to 1270. There are all listed here. https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/5.2-listing-of-clinical-sites-and-cvs-pages-1-41.pdf… This is the last page. There is no site 1271. There is no other site with a number above 1270.”
Remember this BMJ Investigation questioning the integrity of Pfizer vaccine trials ignored by the MSM and authorities?
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Continue reading
Pfizer’s Criminal behavior and a coverup by the FDA and the CDC can’t get any more obvious. Will these new revelations be ignored as well? I am afraid so.
Twitter already started marking replies to the thread as “Misleading”:
Your support is greatly appreciated!
If you wish to support by contributing a different amount from the substack yearly subscription, you can Donate via Ko-fi, where you can buy as many “coffees” as you like, monthly or one-time donations are accepted.