OUTRAGE: UK Court FORCES Vaccination on Baby Against Mother’s Wishes
When “child protection” becomes state control — a North London mother loses her right to decide what goes into her baby’s body.
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
In a chilling High Court decision, an Islington mother has been overruled by the state, her 8-month-old daughter will be vaccinated without her consent.
The ruling, justified under “child welfare,” has ignited debate over parental rights, medical freedom, and the expanding power of local authorities over family life in Britain.
By Niamh Harris November 5, 2025
A north London council has won a High Court battle to vaccinate an eight month old baby girl against her mother’s wishes..
Islington Council faced a legal challenge by one of its residents after it arranged for her daughter to receive routine vaccinations while the child was in its care.
The mother had refused to allow her child receive the jab because she believes that vaccinations raise the chances of autism.
However, at court the judge, Mr Justice McDonald decided that not vaccinating the baby would leave her at risk of childhood disease “at a very young age when she remains vulnerable,” and ruled in favor of the local authority.
BBC reports: The baby, known only as P, has been under the north London council’s guardianship since February due to concerns that her mother could not meet her or her older siblings’ basic care needs.
In July, the council proposed the infant stay with her mother at the family home while under its supervision, until it was decided whether or not she would permanently be taken out of her mother’s care.
During this time the mother refused to have her daughter vaccinated.
After the council moved ahead with the appointment out of concern for the child’s welfare, Ms S took the local authority to the High Court to try to stop it.
‘All those chemicals’
The Local Democracy Reporting Service reports that the mother told the court she was convinced of the links between vaccines and autism or ADHD, and believed ethnic minority children were adversely affected by the jabs.
She also said she had seen proof online that 4,500 children had died from preventable diseases and deemed this a low risk when compared to the country’s large child population.
At the High Court hearing Mr Justice McDonald “gently pressed” the mother that there were no scientific studies proving the connection between autism and vaccinations.
But Ms S maintained it was still her right to decide, arguing that her daughter was “too tiny to be pumped with vaccinations with all those chemicals”.
She added that she might consider letting her child receive the jabs if she were older.
The Children Act 1989 gives local authorities the power to arrange for children in care to be vaccinated even if their parents object.
While there is no law that says children must be vaccinated, the NHS strongly urges parents to follow its routine schedule of vaccinations for babies under one year of age, starting at eight weeks, to protect against diseases like measles, tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.
Related articles:
There are scientific studies that really do prove that vaccines cause autism and much more too. This judge and social services could be prosecuted with those studies as well. Goes to show this country is not responsible enough to do its homework and that have put millions of our children, even our family relatives in huge danger. That's not protecting our children or other members of society whatsoever.
Medical tyranny! Holistic and traditional medicines far pre-date non-scientific and unproven Pharmakon (sorcery) yet this is what these fascist regimes are trying to force on us!
"Therefore submit only to God. Resist the devil and he will flee from you!" James 4:7