37 Comments
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 15
Expand full comment
jsinton's avatar

LOOK! A COMEDIAN!

"Furthermore, in the combined reproductive and development animal studies using 200-times the clinical dose of mRNA vaccines, there were no adverse effects on male or female fertility, fetal deaths, birth defects, or developmental delays.Evidence from the more than 13 billion vaccine doses given worldwide shows that COVID-19 vaccines have a very good safety profile in all age groups. The benefits of the approved vaccines far outweigh the possible risks.Contact for members of the media:Email: news@health.gov.auPhone: 02 6289 7400."

Expand full comment
A Person's avatar

Article "FACT: Covid-19 Vaccines are almost 50 times Deadlier than the Flu Vaccines per Number of Doses administered according to official USA data": https://expose-news.com/2022/02/21/covid-vaccines-50-times-deadlier-than-flu-vaccines/

Personally, an unproven defence against an unproven virus that may well have been radiation that has been claimed to cause flu-like illness doesn't sound like a benefit to me.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 15
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Diane Berwick's avatar

They all need disbanding, Malfeasance & Negligence, trust has completely gone. I only hope in UK we can lock so many up as well.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Mar 16
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Tirion's avatar

We don't need retribution. Two wrongs don't make a right. All we need is justice. It is very important that justice is done, and seen to be done.

Expand full comment
John P. Wallis's avatar

Count me in on dispensing Retribution.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 15
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Mark peter's avatar

💯

Expand full comment
Mark peter's avatar

Lawsuits and death penalties! LFG 🍿

Expand full comment
Kikimick44's avatar

Totally agree!

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Oh joy! Lemme get this straight. These mRNA poisons cause cancer yet the FDA and CDC still invite you to take them by the droves and are even allowing big pharma to invent dozens more. I mean, do they think we are as dumb as they are?

Expand full comment
Hazel's avatar

Most people are including nurses and physicians I work with.

Expand full comment
jsinton's avatar

It was very telling, the people who were exempt from mandates.

Expand full comment
John P. Wallis's avatar

Cons in Con-gress exempted themselves from mRNA Bioweapon jabs. In 5 years, not one Con in Con-gress died from C19 or mRNA Bioweapons...

Expand full comment
Catherine Hawkins's avatar

Wake up the president and many like Peter Hotez , just to mention one misinformed doctor , as they still think the COVID -warp speed - bio weapon injections saved millions! God help us!

Expand full comment
Justin's avatar

The substance of this is from a Feb 14 posting from slay news. Is there any link to an actual FDA statement? In the Slay News article, they say an FDA statement is forthcoming, but I've not seen it. Did I miss something in this message, or link to an FDA statement elsewhere?

Also, I saw a court ruling or statement by the German government essentially placing all liability for the shots upon doctors/administering agents!!!! Didn't the government mandate it there? The truth is coming out, and doctors and administering agents just became the liability scapegoat.

Expand full comment
KarlM Alias's avatar

The Court ruling was from the European Court of Justice, and indeed, it throws doctors under the bus. Not that I disagree with that, but they seem to be wriggling blame away from the regulatory bodies.

Have you heard the press conference by a Slovakian health official? He references both the ECJ ruling, and the FBI's involvement:

https://www.brighteon.com/f1b86228-a8f2-4eca-90f5-a62589cd8f9f

Expand full comment
MariYahu's avatar

Trump signed off on $500 billion for cancer v@xseens. Guess where they are being developed and manufactured? In Ukraine.... at Wrap Speed ... RNA creates the tumour, the war is the distraction. Like the Twin Towers.

Expand full comment
Steve C's avatar

Let us all hope Shannon Joy is well-"vaxxed" and boosted, and enjoying loads of PUFA'd fries this weekend.

I consider her to be one of the worst of the "anti-jab" grifters. Sure the jabs were bad... and RNA NEVER COULD PANDEMIC....but so many of her friends knew this back before 2020. Duhhhhhhh. And none of them have moved the ball one inch since 2021. RFK JR. ? the jury's still out on him. If he revealed all he knows, he'd be sht canned yesterday.

Expand full comment
Brandon is not your bro's avatar

🤬🤬🤬💰💰💰

Expand full comment
aarnwri's avatar

> The FDA is expected to comment on the findings this month.

>

> However, the agency has yet to issue a public alert, recall the affected batches, or explain

> how vials exceeding safety standards were allowed to reach the market.

The FDA hasn't admitted anything... And they probably won't.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

BRAVO!

Expand full comment
Metta's avatar

This study was published in December of last year.

Why has RFK, Jr. done *nothing* to pull these toxic shots OFF the market, once and for all?

Expand full comment
RAY FALCIOLA's avatar

Personally I would not care if the DNA contamination was WITHIN recommended limits because I do not nor will I ever trust ANYTHING we're ever told. It is like saying their is an acceptable lead contamination limit. THER IS NOT. Same deal for other foreign substances. Regardless I would never trust the "safety" limits recommended by chronic irredeemable liars for hire (it's not just lawyers:). Even if they aren't liars for hire they have no way to know what is actually "safe", particularly without LOOOONG term testing and statistical analysis. Best case it is nothing more than best guessery biased to the result that the contractor needs. You don't have to hate everyone and be unhealthily cynical to see what is going on. But in fact what we've seen is nothing but deception, bait and switch and every other trick in the book to get the lab rats to line up for their mandated needle rape. An injection that can potentially modify you &/or your offspring's genetics certainly deserves the needle rape description.

Imagine, once upon a time they blamed the flu's that mostly seemed to come from Asia (swine flu bird flu etc) came from people living in primitive too-close proximity to each other and to potential zoonotic carriers. Every so often it was alleged that a bug with buggery in mind would cross the species barrier and boom you got yourself some bird or swine flu. Point taken. Zoonosis is more likely if you're living in the zoo.

But let's face it, hanging around farm critters just wasn't cutting it for the agenda SO WHY NOT DIRECTLY INJECT the buggery into the veins of the zoonotic hesitant human species? So much more effective and helps to remove the vagaries of chance embodied in the scenario where a peasant family lives above the chicken and swine pens and accidently gets a whiff of bird flu buggery. And it is really difficult and expensive to get people to voluntarily wade need deep in bat guano from bat caves. INJECTION is the efficient way to bring the zoo to the zoonotic hosts.

Far as I can see the most recent claims that we are becoming GMO versions of what we once were most precisely nails the agenda. We're just a herd of animals that would be much more well behaved if we could selectively cull &/or enhance with a little bit of that Holy Grail GMO therapy that is slowly wiping out genetic diversity in the food arena.

The paradox of all this gene muckery is that instead of everyone in the future being smart tall slim attractive and fit we'll all have purposely implanted weaknesses so that we can be thinned out with the flick of a switch or a well disguised injection that you need to take for the greater good and to protect grandma ... if grandma manages to live long enough for it to be an issue.

Expand full comment
sifubernie's avatar

Ah!ah!ah! What is the meaning of contaminants in a poison???

Expand full comment
jsinton's avatar

5 years later after the REAL doctors TOLD us it would happen. Guess it was just an accident.

Expand full comment
D F Barr's avatar

You still can’t sue. They’re immune.

Expand full comment
Edwin's avatar

But you can sue them for something else, like spitting on the sidewalk, or any type of malpractice.

Expand full comment
jsinton's avatar

That might change. It could be retroactive.

Expand full comment