BREAKING: Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Study Shows 54% Higher Rate of Cancer and 549% Higher Rate of Autism in Vaccinated Children
A peer-reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study, shows that vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of chronic diseases compared to unvaccinated children.
One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:
⚡ What aren’t they telling you? Please Join Exposing the Darkness News on Telegram.
By Rhoda Wilson December 13, 2025
A peer-reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study, published on 9 December 2025, shows that vaccinated children had significantly higher rates of chronic diseases compared to unvaccinated children.
The reanalysis, authored by John W. Oller, Jr., PhD; Daniel Broudy, PhD and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, asserts that the original study’s statistical methods obscured large proportional differences in the data.
According to the reanalysis, vaccinated children were sicker across all 22 chronic disease categories listed, with autism-associated neurodevelopmental conditions occurring at 549% higher rates and childhood cancer at 54% higher rates in the vaccinated cohort.
On 9 September, a Henry Ford study on the impact of childhood vaccination became the centre of vaccination safety debate during a hearing of the US Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations titled ‘How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines’.
The study followed 18,468 children between 2000 and 2016 from birth until 31 December 2017 to evaluate the health outcomes of vaccinated compared to unvaccinated children.
The study, referred to as the Lamerato et al study, has never been published in a journal. However, at the Senate hearing, Attorney Aaron Siri, who had received a copy of the study in early 2020, revealed data from the study:
Siri testified at the Senate hearing, “The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe. Instead, these researchers found that the vaccinated children have 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease and 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant.”
“There were also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group but zero in the unvaccinated group, hence a rate cannot be calculated, including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities and tics,” Siri added. “for example, there were 262 cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group and none in the unvaccinated group.”
On 9 December, John Oller, Daniel Broudy and Nicolas Hulscher published their reanalysis of the data collected by the Lamerato et al study. The difference between the two studies is the way the data is analysed. The Lamerato et al study used odds-ratio modelling, a statistical approach that masked large disparities. Oller et al used a comparison of proportions per cohort approach. The same data analysed in different ways produced dramatically different results.
The abstract of the Oller et al study said:
Of the 22 chronic disease conditions studied, proportional contrasts always favour the unvaccinated. The most dramatic contrasts occurred in asthma, autism, autoimmunity, ADHD, brain dysfunction, mental health disorders, behavioural disability, developmental delay, learning disability, intellectual disability, speech disorder, motor disability, tics, other disability disorder, neurological disorder, and seizure disorder. At ten years of follow-up, 57% of the vaccinated cohort had at least one chronic disorder, compared with 17% in the unvaccinated.
A Peer-Review of the Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Study Discussed at the Senate Hearing on September 9, 2025. (2025). International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research , 4(1), 1609-1646. https://doi.org/10.56098/vse7qq65
The following is Joel Smalley’s summary of Oller et al’s reanalysis. Smalley also posted a short video on Substack to explain the difference between the original study and the reanalysis. We are unable to embed videos uploaded onto Substack. You can watch the video by following THIS link.
Key Results
A peer-reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study (18,468 children, 2000-2016) comparing vaccinated (16,511, median 18 vaccines) vs unvaccinated (1,957) children found:
Headline findings:
All 22 chronic disease categories showed higher rates in vaccinated children
Autism-associated neurodevelopmental conditions: 549% higher in vaccinated group
Childhood cancer: 54% higher in vaccinated group
By age 10: 57% of vaccinated children had developed at least one chronic disease vs only 17% of unvaccinated
Most elevated conditions included:
Autoimmune disease: 12× higher
Neurodevelopmental disorders: 13.5× higher
Speech disorders: 9× higher
Asthma: 6.5× higher
Several conditions appeared only in vaccinated children: ADHD, diabetes, brain dysfunction, behavioural disability, learning disability, intellectual disability, and tics.
Hulscher argues that the original study’s statistical methods (odds-ratio modelling) masked these disparities, particularly where the unvaccinated group had zero cases.
Read: Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across All 22 Chronic Disease Categories, Nicolas Hulscher, 11 December 2025
A Peer Review of the Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Study Discussed at the Senate Hearing on 9 September 2025 IJVTPR 9 December 2025
Related articles:
![Catherine Austin Fitts: "What Happens When 70% of the Parents in America Discover That They Have Systematically Poisoned Their Children [With ‘Vaccines’]?”](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!bpTb!,w_140,h_140,c_fill,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep,g_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff238bc10-5709-4741-b790-e016688c3a38_686x381.png)
Lioness, you may want to do an article about my appearance last week on "Redacted" with Clayton Morris concerning the vaccine-induced "micro-clots," a pregnant women study, and video of two long-time Iowa embalmers admitting that they have been seeing the WHITE FIBROUS CLOTS for the last 5 years. After being up for just one day, my "Redacted" interview already has over 300,000 views and 4,200 comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlI4gd39xfM
The CDC recommended childhood vaccination schedule is a travesty.
https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/landmark-paediatricians-lawsuit-against
And the unparalleled injurious & fatal mRNA transfection injections MUST be recalled and the inherently dangerous and deadly mRNA transfection platform MUST be banned.
https://tdefender.substack.com/p/chd-asks-fda-to-revoke-covid-vaccine-licenses-petition
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/tell-the-fda-to-revoke-licenses-on-covid-vaccines/
"Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is asking the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to revoke the licenses for all Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.
On Monday, CHD filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA and is urging the public, including healthcare workers, parents and military members, to submit comments on the petition."
Here's the direct link to submit a comment to the FDA about CHD's petition:
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2025-P-6831-0001