Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Howard Steen's avatar

Thanks for highlighting this. This is a very important scientific paper. I live in Germany and through a lawyer friend I got to meet and interview one of the co-authors of this paper, Prof. Reitzner. He and another expert Prof. Cullen who is a molecular biologist for laboratory medicine, were called to give statements at a criminal legal proceeding in Osnabrück on Nov 4th which I attended as an observer. The day after the hearing I did a short interview with Matthias Reitzner in English.

You may find this of interest:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2f7YTaBzlw

It is believed this is the first time since 2020 that expert witness testimony has been given at a German court of law saying all of the following:

- there was no pandemic in Germany in 2020 because there was no significant excess mortality

- causation between use of the toxic injectable and deaths of 100,000 German citizens has been proven to 93% correlation

[by extension the same correlation applies all citizens of the EU where another German Data analyst, Tom Lausen, has independently determined that nearly 2 million injection deaths occurred EU countries + Switzerland.]

- the injectable substances contain highly toxic chemicals causing injury and death to the human organism (Prof. Cullen, Munster university)

The legal case itself at which Reitzner and Cullen appeared is not remarkable in itself but it is typical of how the judicial system has been used to demonise anyone who spoke out strongly in a way to challenge the government’s Covid narrative. The process involves 5 accused members of a Corona critical political party formed in 2020. Their ‘crime’ which the state initiated proceeding against in 2022 was to write a letter to their city mayor and councillors containing information from critical doctors and scientists warning them that the injectable substances are dangerous and suggesting they should take note of the information in deciding policy decisions about vaccination. They were warned that their ignorance of such information might get them into legal difficulties in case they will be held responsible in the future for their actions. Because this group put in the letter that the list of recipients MIGHT be posted on a public website, the letter was framed as being ‘coercive’. This is a punishable crime in Germany called ‘Nötigung’. Here, it is not a question of a prison sentence but a fine for the individuals involved.

This is a very short video about the case itself and I will be writing an article about this.

https://odysee.com/@shortXXvids:e/Keine-'Pandemie'-aber-Todesfälle-durch-Impfstoffe:3

la chevalerie vit's avatar

Institutions that pushed experimental JABS - jabs whose original clinical trials showed MORE deaths (esp cardiac) in the jab arm than the control arm - deserve the LOW trust they have gotten since from the critical thinking portions of the world’s populace. I’m still waiting for the thinking-adjacent people to catch up.

“ April 2022 to March 2023, excess mortality rose sharply, with regional differences diminishing and new states becoming the most affected.

“In 2022/23, vaccination rates and trust in institutions were notably associated with excess mortality. States which had higher trust in institutions had higher vaccination rates. And higher vaccination rates were linked to larger increases in excess mortality. Higher vaccination rates were also linked to smaller declines in covid deaths and case fatality rates; in other words, proportionally more covid deaths were recorded in states with higher vaccination rates.”

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?