A War Against Humanity: Canadian Government Declares the Unvaccinated To Be a Danger to Society
A War Against Humanity: Canadian Government Declares the Unvaccinated To Be a Danger to Society
What's next? Concentration camps and gas chambers?
The fascist Canadian regime just declared millions of unvaccinated Canadians already stripped of their mobility rights to be a danger to society.
Adam van Koeverden, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health, recently made an astonishing statement during his speech in the Parlament:
“Unfortunately, the unvaccinated continue to disproportionally risk the safety of those vaccinated against COVID-19"
This disgusting attack on millions of Canadians did not come as a surprise.
Planned and well-organized demonization of Canadian citizens who refused to be injected with experimental Gene Therapy bioweapon, has been gradually intensifying during the past several months:
The Toronto Star, Canada’s largest newspaper, Aug. 26, 2021:
Canadian Prime Minister Justine Trudeau, December 2021: “Do We Tolerate These People? Trudeau Calls the Unvaccinated “Misogynists” and “Racists” Who “Don’t Believe in Science”
And finally, a “study” by doctor David Fishman a faculty member of The UofT Dalla Lana School of Public Health sponsored by Big Pharma, van Koeverden quoted in his Parlament speech.
Fishman uses the eugenics terminology of “population mixing” for a reason. A term adjustment from “race-mixing” to “vaxxed-unvaxxed mixing” does not change the physiological impact of identifying a new subhuman group targeted for stigmatization and elimination:
Obviously, this political maneuver has nothing to do with science.
A group of real scientists demanded a retraction of Fishman’s Big Pharma sponsored anti-scientific propaganda piece:
The so-called “study” is a part of the coordinated government PSYOP to incite hatred against the unvaccinated.
Immediately after the “study” was published, the absurd headline “Mixing with the unvaccinated increases the risk of COVID - 19 infection for fully vaccinated” was blasted across multiple legacy media outlets:
And here is “the final solution” to the anti-vaxer question by a Canadian “conservative” journalist.
They just love the “final solution” theme…
I am not going to repeat myself about the similarities between Covid tyranny and Nazi Germany, and what is coming upon the world in a near future.
Nazi Germany was a trial in preparation for the coming Global Genocide. We are currently witnessing its first stage, the worst is yet to come.
Please read my recently published articles on these topics:
Stunning Parallels Between COVID Measures and Nazi Germany
“For the Greater Good”: Shanghai COVID Atrocities Foreshadow Things To Come
China is signalling the next stage of the plandemic PSYOP
Related articles:
Following the Footsteps of the Third Reich: Canada Announces Medicalized Murder of the Mentally Ill
The Hidden History of the Revived Roman Empire
A Staged Russia/Ukraine Conflict Is Part of the Plan To Take Down the Current World Order
Rerum Novarum - The Real New World Order. The Hidden Hand Behind Agenda 21/2030 and The Great Reset
The Corona End Game. The Truth Behind The Symbols
If you wish to support by contributing a different amount from the substack yearly subscription, you can Donate via Ko-fi, where you can buy as many “coffees” as you like. Your support is greatly appreciated!
Surely to God, Mark Slapinsky was being sarcastic. How could he possibly NOT be aware of the reality of what he was saying?😱 I've visited Dachau. I've read "The Gulag Archipelago" as far as I could stand it, half-way through Volume II; the horror of what Solzhenitsyn was describing was too much.
And if he WAS serious? Then something like The Nuremberg Tribunals for him. His execution after the inevitable "guilty" verdict, public and televised. I favour the guillotine for these monsters: Impossible to fake, no ambiguity. Leave his head on a pole for a few weeks so we'll know justice was served.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
7 December 1996.
Introduction
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to
which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in
a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behaviour for the post
World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document
enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The
principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control
his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected
benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended
into general codes of medical ethics.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical
experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds,
conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the
practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such
experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other
methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must
be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This
means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent;
should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without
the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching,
or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient
knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved
as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This
latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision
by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature,
duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is
to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected;
and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his
participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests
upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf